Forum

by **betiko** on Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:11 am

why not but this has been suggested many times before.
would it be ok to play 2/4 players vs that 1 man team?
would there be a special medal or would it be counted as dubs/trips/quads unique kills? I guess lots of configs would be acceptable such as 2vs2 quads?

by **greenoaks** on Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:52 am

how would this with unlimited forts be any different to 1v1

by **betiko** on Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:00 am

greenoaks wrote:how would this with unlimited forts be any different to 1v1

Bonuses, spoils, strategy

by **chapcrap** on Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:47 am

MERGED with the exact same suggestion in Submitted Suggestions subforum.

by **trevor33** on Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:16 am

So what's the hold up with this?

by **chapcrap** on Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:31 am

trevor33 wrote:So what's the hold up with this?

Same as all other suggestions. The programmer chooses what to do with the time available and completes the task. The new leadership is still transitioning and hasn't started implementing suggestions, so things will take a while still. And I can tell you that this suggestion is not first priority for most.

by **greenoaks** on Sun Dec 23, 2012 2:08 pm

chapcrap wrote:
trevor33 wrote:So what's the hold up with this?

Same as all other suggestions. The programmer chooses what to do with the time available and completes the task. The new leadership is still transitioning and hasn't started implementing suggestions, so things will take a while still. And I can tell you that this suggestion is not first priority for most.

it wouldn't make my top 10

by **agentcom** on Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

betiko wrote:why not but this has been suggested many times before.
would it be ok to play 2/4 players vs that 1 man team?
would there be a special medal or would it be counted as dubs/trips/quads unique kills? I guess lots of configs would be acceptable such as 2vs2 quads?

I don't think it would be ok to play 1 player v a team. IIRC, that idea has been kicked around and it would be too easy for that single player to gain too much of an advantage.

As for medals ... your guess is as good as mine, but I would think that this would be a new medal type.

by **BENCLUB** on Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:02 am

Concise description:

On the map there are 4 colors, and each player play with 2 colors.

Specifics/Details:

It will be the same rules that for double, but with only 2 players

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

This mode will be for player who want to play 1v1 without this spupid neutral

by **greenoaks** on Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:27 am

2 player team games

by **chapcrap** on Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:29 am

greenoaks wrote:2 player team games

Exactly.

MERGED

by **dildobaggins** on Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:30 am

[NEW GAME STYLE]

It would be fun and a different strategy if you had it so 1 player had 2 colors to control in a game.
Ex: Imagine a 4 player doubles game there is a red & green on the same team, instead player 1 has control of both sets of troop colors. Player 2 has both yellow and blue control. This calls for more think ahead strategy similar to team games but minus the possible deadbeats or clueless random teammates. We should give this a try if the programming can understand this new style of gameplay.

Concise description:

1 Player 2 Colors

Specifics/Details:

see above

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

New strategy/gameplay similar to team games with less cooperation fails

[/list]

by **dildobaggins** on Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:34 am

you could have the players name read:
ex: dildobaggins squad 1
dildobaggins squad 2

Ps. can even have gameplay of up to 8 squads each in a 2 player game..ideal for big maps that are no fun with 2

by **BigBallinStalin** on Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:03 am

So you get team medals for playing by yourself?

I don't care about medals, but I imagine most would be annoyed by that.

by **crispybits** on Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:12 am

I'm sure someone will be along soon with a link to a previous identical suggestion as I've seen this before, and that link will contain many of the arguments I've seen against it. In theory I like the idea and I hope you stick with it and modify it and work it to become something that can work, but you have some problems to overcome before it can become a really viable idea. Good luck!