[Invites] Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Suggestions that have made it through the grind, and have become integrated into the site!

Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby Metsfanmax on Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:13 pm

stahrgazer wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:Nobody gets hurt when somebody posts a spam topic in a social forum.


And no one gets hurt when an inactive doesn't join a game he or she was invited to join; it expires in 24 hours. Nor does anyone get hurt by receiving a random invite; they join or do not join. If they join, they play, if they don't join, someone else plays.


False; the OP and the first few responses indicated that the system was abused as a result of this.
User avatar
Lieutenant Metsfanmax
Head Thinker
Head Thinker
 
Posts: 3695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Location: NY
Medals: 40
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (2)
General Contribution (5)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby stahrgazer on Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:46 am

Metsfanmax wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:Nobody gets hurt when somebody posts a spam topic in a social forum.


And no one gets hurt when an inactive doesn't join a game he or she was invited to join; it expires in 24 hours. Nor does anyone get hurt by receiving a random invite; they join or do not join. If they join, they play, if they don't join, someone else plays.


False; the OP and the first few responses indicated that the system was abused as a result of this.


Not false. Here's what they're saying:
The trick that I've seen used (and there could easily be others), is a team will start a public game, and then invite a single, inactive player to fill one of the spots on the opposing team. This keeps any other real teams from joining together, as one of the spots is reserved, so the games fill up with random people, making for a much easier win than a well-practiced team would.


So?
The invitee does not have to accept. Established teams can join other games and play together.

"Near-farming" constitutes a much worse "abuse" of a system than, "omigosh, this particular game is full, my regular team and I will have to find another game to battle on,"

I define "near-farming" as picking on people who just got their 5 games so are no longer ? but are obviously not familiar with the types of maps that are "legal" for high ranking folk to "invite" them to play. And the response has continued to be, "the new cadet does not have to join."

So, that's the CC response: the player being invited does NOT have to join.

And stretching that a bit farther, the teams that wish to play together can open their own games or find another to join, or join a tournament together. However, assuming a cadet does join, he's got a better chance of someone else joining who does know the map, so can show him the ropes, than those who are being "orchard plucked" in 1v1 freestyle on intricate maps - which CC has ruled over and over again, is perfectly legal to do.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby Metsfanmax on Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:05 am

stahrgazer wrote:So?
The invitee does not have to accept. Established teams can join other games and play together.

"Near-farming" constitutes a much worse "abuse" of a system than, "omigosh, this particular game is full, my regular team and I will have to find another game to battle on,"

I define "near-farming" as picking on people who just got their 5 games so are no longer ? but are obviously not familiar with the types of maps that are "legal" for high ranking folk to "invite" them to play. And the response has continued to be, "the new cadet does not have to join."

So, that's the CC response: the player being invited does NOT have to join.

And stretching that a bit farther, the teams that wish to play together can open their own games or find another to join, or join a tournament together. However, assuming a cadet does join, he's got a better chance of someone else joining who does know the map, so can show him the ropes, than those who are being "orchard plucked" in 1v1 freestyle on intricate maps - which CC has ruled over and over again, is perfectly legal to do.


Qualitatively, this example is the same as "regular" farming - you're still taking advantage of new players who don't understand what they're getting into. Personally, I don't think there should be any rules against farming; but at the point where there are, they should at least be consistent.
User avatar
Lieutenant Metsfanmax
Head Thinker
Head Thinker
 
Posts: 3695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Location: NY
Medals: 40
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (2)
General Contribution (5)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby stahrgazer on Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:19 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:So?
The invitee does not have to accept. Established teams can join other games and play together.

"Near-farming" constitutes a much worse "abuse" of a system than, "omigosh, this particular game is full, my regular team and I will have to find another game to battle on,"

I define "near-farming" as picking on people who just got their 5 games so are no longer ? but are obviously not familiar with the types of maps that are "legal" for high ranking folk to "invite" them to play. And the response has continued to be, "the new cadet does not have to join."

So, that's the CC response: the player being invited does NOT have to join.

And stretching that a bit farther, the teams that wish to play together can open their own games or find another to join, or join a tournament together. However, assuming a cadet does join, he's got a better chance of someone else joining who does know the map, so can show him the ropes, than those who are being "orchard plucked" in 1v1 freestyle on intricate maps - which CC has ruled over and over again, is perfectly legal to do.


Qualitatively, this example is the same as "regular" farming - you're still taking advantage of new players who don't understand what they're getting into. Personally, I don't think there should be any rules against farming; but at the point where there are, they should at least be consistent.


Well, CC ruled that if it's not ? then it's not farming. Meanwhile, I disagree that there should not be any rules against farming, but I would like it consistent, which is why I do not support this change to the invite system.

The original post isn't about disallowing higher rank players from inviting new recruits. To be consistent with prior CC rulings, whoever invites miscellaneous players that aren't consistently new recruits, are doing NOTHING wrong, so no system change is required.

"Those being invited can refuse to join, and find other games to play," and "teams that wish to play together as a unit can open their own public games and invite whoever THEY would like to play with."

It has NEVER been illegal to refuse a game, and CC should not start a precedent of making it 'illegal' or "impossible" to refuse a game. Teams that are doing this "invite one opponent" thing are either 1) being cleverly proactive about refusing to play existing teams by limiting the ability in advance; 2) hoping some experienced players show a less experienced player the ropes; 3) trying to encourage more activity; or 4) letting the person they do invite go through the legwork of inviting whoever he/she wants to team with.

I can't see anything wrong with it, even if it pisses a few people off that they are unable to bring a team in to play THAT particular group on THAT particular public game.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby Metsfanmax on Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:46 pm

stahrgazer wrote:
It has NEVER been illegal to refuse a game, and CC should not start a precedent of making it 'illegal' or "impossible" to refuse a game.


Implementing this feature has nothing to do with whether players can refuse games or not.

Teams that are doing this "invite one opponent" thing are either 1) being cleverly proactive about refusing to play existing teams by limiting the ability in advance; 2) hoping some experienced players show a less experienced player the ropes; 3) trying to encourage more activity; or 4) letting the person they do invite go through the legwork of inviting whoever he/she wants to team with.


None of the above are what is being discussed here. Clearly there is a fifth possibility, that is the cause for this suggestion: they are taking advantage of naive or stupid players (i.e. the ones who would join a random game with an unknown teammate). Whether you call it farming or not, it's qualitatively the same.
User avatar
Lieutenant Metsfanmax
Head Thinker
Head Thinker
 
Posts: 3695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Location: NY
Medals: 40
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (2)
General Contribution (5)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby stahrgazer on Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:16 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:
It has NEVER been illegal to refuse a game, and CC should not start a precedent of making it 'illegal' or "impossible" to refuse a game.


Implementing this feature has nothing to do with whether players can refuse games or not.

Teams that are doing this "invite one opponent" thing are either 1) being cleverly proactive about refusing to play existing teams by limiting the ability in advance; 2) hoping some experienced players show a less experienced player the ropes; 3) trying to encourage more activity; or 4) letting the person they do invite go through the legwork of inviting whoever he/she wants to team with.


None of the above are what is being discussed here. Clearly there is a fifth possibility, that is the cause for this suggestion: they are taking advantage of naive or stupid players (i.e. the ones who would join a random game with an unknown teammate). Whether you call it farming or not, it's qualitatively the same.


Sorry, you can't prove that it's not: Teams that are doing this "invite one opponent" thing are 1) being cleverly proactive about refusing to play existing teams by limiting the ability in advance;

But even if you could? Again, per CC prior rulings: It's only a problem if it's done to ? (new recruits). Otherwise, it's all perfectly fine parts of the game, that nothing needs to be done to correct... Nothing should be done to correct something that's perfectly legal ESPECIALLY when what would be done legitimate uses of invite, which this would.

Now, when CC starts ruling that any taking advantage of naivety on an ongoing basis against individuals (even if they are no longer 'new recruits') DOES constitute "farming or other abuse of the game system" and starts disciplining or other programming to fix that - then I would agree that something should be done about potential taking advantage of naivety in team games. But between the two, taking advantage on a 1-on-1 basis is worse, because at least with teams, the naive individual has a chance to get teammates who DO know what they're doing.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby Metsfanmax on Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:14 pm

stahrgazer wrote:Sorry, you can't prove that it's not: Teams that are doing this "invite one opponent" thing are 1) being cleverly proactive about refusing to play existing teams by limiting the ability in advance;

But even if you could? Again, per CC prior rulings: It's only a problem if it's done to ? (new recruits). Otherwise, it's all perfectly fine parts of the game, that nothing needs to be done to correct... Nothing should be done to correct something that's perfectly legal ESPECIALLY when what would be done legitimate uses of invite, which this would.

Now, when CC starts ruling that any taking advantage of naivety on an ongoing basis against individuals (even if they are no longer 'new recruits') DOES constitute "farming or other abuse of the game system" and starts disciplining or other programming to fix that - then I would agree that something should be done about potential taking advantage of naivety in team games. But between the two, taking advantage on a 1-on-1 basis is worse, because at least with teams, the naive individual has a chance to get teammates who DO know what they're doing.


This is all irrelevant. If someone was going to be hurt by this policy, then that would be one thing. But the fact is that we're only preventing something that rationally shouldn't be allowed in the first place (inviting people to play your game who most likely won't join because they're inactive). The only people that this affects are the people who are using the current system to prevent actual teams from joining their games; but I don't feel particularly bad for them. If they don't want to play against particular people, they shouldn't start open games. As an added benefit, we also protect players from joining games with teammates that they didn't intend to play with. Even if you think it's a good thing that there's a loophole people can use to refuse to play existing teams (?), it's certainly also a good thing that we're protecting unsuspecting players.
User avatar
Lieutenant Metsfanmax
Head Thinker
Head Thinker
 
Posts: 3695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Location: NY
Medals: 40
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (2)
General Contribution (5)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby jefjef on Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:15 pm

This is a fantastic and flawless suggestion.

End of discussion.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 5958
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass
Medals: 46
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (9)
Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby stahrgazer on Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:21 am

Metsfanmax wrote:This is all irrelevant. If someone was going to be hurt by this policy, then that would be one thing.


As (I think it was Andy?) pointed out, sometimes inactive players are invited to games as a means of bringing them back; which means that, potentially, CC would be hurt by this change.

And, it's not irrelevant to suggest that if it's "bad" to invite near-noobs to team games, because those near-noobs just might not understand the map; bad enough that you have to create a program change to prevent it... then it's quite relevant to wonder why, if it's so BAAAAAAAAAAD for team games, then why isn't it as bad or even worse to do it for individual games?

CC has already ruled consistently that it's only illegal to invite "lesser skilled players" if the near-noobs being invited are true noobs, as in, new recruits, on a systemic basis. That is not what this suggestion claims will be prevented.

So, if it's not illegal, no change should be made. If it is illegal, then start enforcing it on individual bases.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby Woodruff on Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:24 pm

stahrgazer wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:This is all irrelevant. If someone was going to be hurt by this policy, then that would be one thing.


As (I think it was Andy?) pointed out, sometimes inactive players are invited to games as a means of bringing them back; which means that, potentially, CC would be hurt by this change.

And, it's not irrelevant to suggest that if it's "bad" to invite near-noobs to team games, because those near-noobs just might not understand the map; bad enough that you have to create a program change to prevent it... then it's quite relevant to wonder why, if it's so BAAAAAAAAAAD for team games, then why isn't it as bad or even worse to do it for individual games?

CC has already ruled consistently that it's only illegal to invite "lesser skilled players" if the near-noobs being invited are true noobs, as in, new recruits, on a systemic basis. That is not what this suggestion claims will be prevented.

So, if it's not illegal, no change should be made. If it is illegal, then start enforcing it on individual bases.


Just because this action isn't currently illegal doesn't mean that it shouldn't be looked at as being illegal. As well, just because a thing is determined to be illegal, does not at all mean that all types of that thing must be illegal. This seems as clear-cut as possible of an example of abuse of the system that should be removed.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby Metsfanmax on Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:47 pm

stahrgazer wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:This is all irrelevant. If someone was going to be hurt by this policy, then that would be one thing.


As (I think it was Andy?) pointed out, sometimes inactive players are invited to games as a means of bringing them back; which means that, potentially, CC would be hurt by this change.


What is the hope? That they'll see an e-mail saying "you've been invited to a game!" and think "I totally forgot about Conquer Club, I'm going to start playing again right now!"? Seems unlikely. If they haven't even logged in for a month, say, it doesn't mean they forgot about CC - it means they don't want to play anymore. Presumably if they wanted to be available to be contacted after leaving, they would select that option in their profile preferences.

And, it's not irrelevant to suggest that if it's "bad" to invite near-noobs to team games, because those near-noobs just might not understand the map; bad enough that you have to create a program change to prevent it... then it's quite relevant to wonder why, if it's so BAAAAAAAAAAD for team games, then why isn't it as bad or even worse to do it for individual games?


In individual games, you don't rely on your opponent being good to win - in fact, it typically helps if they're not good. This suggestion is specifically about team games; I don't even understand how you could possibly relate the two.

CC has already ruled consistently that it's only illegal to invite "lesser skilled players" if the near-noobs being invited are true noobs, as in, new recruits, on a systemic basis. That is not what this suggestion claims will be prevented.

So, if it's not illegal, no change should be made. If it is illegal, then start enforcing it on individual bases.


There's no logical reason why it shouldn't just be made automatically impossible if it's illegal. After all, illegal implies that no one should be doing it - why make more unnecessary work for the mods?
User avatar
Lieutenant Metsfanmax
Head Thinker
Head Thinker
 
Posts: 3695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Location: NY
Medals: 40
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (2)
General Contribution (5)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby stahrgazer on Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:25 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:There's no logical reason why it shouldn't just be made automatically impossible if it's illegal. After all, illegal implies that no one should be doing it - why make more unnecessary work for the mods?


Two "for the change" arguments in this thread:
1) it takes unfair advantage of the uninformed.
2) Whaa whaa my team can't join intact.

Well, argument 1?
It's not illegal for individuals UNLESS it's a systematic attempt to go after NEW RECRUITS. period. Thus, going after cadets, privates, or people who just don't know a map/setting is NOT illegal for individuals. If it's not illegal for individuals, it shouldn't be illegal for teams. Unless it's "illegal" no change should be made.

And for argument 2?
So? Find another game. No change should be made.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby Woodruff on Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:39 pm

stahrgazer wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:There's no logical reason why it shouldn't just be made automatically impossible if it's illegal. After all, illegal implies that no one should be doing it - why make more unnecessary work for the mods?


Two "for the change" arguments in this thread:
1) it takes unfair advantage of the uninformed.
2) Whaa whaa my team can't join intact.

Well, argument 1?
It's not illegal for individuals UNLESS it's a systematic attempt to go after NEW RECRUITS. period. Thus, going after cadets, privates, or people who just don't know a map/setting is NOT illegal for individuals. If it's not illegal for individuals, it shouldn't be illegal for teams. Unless it's "illegal" no change should be made.


Incorrect...you are giving the definition of FARMING, NOT the definition of ABUSE. We are not talking about farming, we are talking about ABUSE. I don't even play team games, and I can see it for what it is.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby Metsfanmax on Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:40 pm

stahrgazer wrote:Well, argument 1?
It's not illegal for individuals UNLESS it's a systematic attempt to go after NEW RECRUITS. period. Thus, going after cadets, privates, or people who just don't know a map/setting is NOT illegal for individuals. If it's not illegal for individuals, it shouldn't be illegal for teams. Unless it's "illegal" no change should be made.


This totally ignores the point of my above post. You said if it's illegal, then it should be done on a case-by-case basis. I observed that that makes no sense.

As for what you're saying here, you're not adding anything constructive, because we're talking about what ought to be considered abusive, not what currently is considered farming.
User avatar
Lieutenant Metsfanmax
Head Thinker
Head Thinker
 
Posts: 3695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Location: NY
Medals: 40
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (6) Clan Achievement (2)
General Contribution (5)

Re: Not allow inactive players to be invited to games

Postby stahrgazer on Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:47 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:
This totally ignores the point of my above post. You said if it's illegal, then it should be done on a case-by-case basis. I observed that that makes no sense.

.


No, I said INDIVIDUAL. I corrected you.
Right now, it's NOT "illegal" for an individual to do those things, but this change wants to make it impossible for teams to do so.

If it's not illegal for individuals, it shouldn't be impossible for teams.

IF this type of "near farming" is made ILLEGAL for individuals (1v1) to do; which it currently is NOT and there's a ton of cases where this - as one of the guys who likes to do it calls it: orchard tendering - is considered an abusive offense...if C&A reports on it are addressed as more than, "famo" - THEN I'd support the idea of a program change that makes it harder for teams to do this sort of thing.

But if it's NOT illegal for individuals (and currently it's not, and lots of CC C&As were closed because it's NOT considered an abuse by CC admin and mods) then this program change should not occur.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

PreviousNext

Return to Implemented Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Login