Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators


Night Strike wrote:Come on keiths31, you put forth a good idea but you forgot to use the form.![]()
Geez, you're letting your fellow G1 members down. Good thing I've got your back.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
sfhbballnut wrote:wow I can just see it massive army gets stuck, completly useless til someone decides to attack t, this would be a mess, but a lot of fun, i say it should be considered
Optimus Prime wrote:sfhbballnut wrote:wow I can just see it massive army gets stuck, completly useless til someone decides to attack t, this would be a mess, but a lot of fun, i say it should be considered
If people no ahead of time that they cannot fortify, they will be much more careful about placing armies. They will be placing 3 here, 4 there, 2 over there and such. That way they can advance in more complicated fashions.
I see this idea as one that will REALLY prove who knows how to play strategically and who doesn't. Would LOVE to see it implemented.
keiths31 wrote:Herakilla wrote:
QFT
huh?

militant wrote:keiths31 wrote:Herakilla wrote:
QFT
huh?
It means quote for truth, so Herakilla agrees with the post he quoted.
Antway, i think no forts would be a awesome idea, and like optimus said it would increase stratergy used in games. Thumbs up from me to
Return to Submitted Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest