Forum

by **wercool** on Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:21 am

Queen_Herpes wrote:I'm so in support of this as a new setting...and so opposed to letting new recrutis play it. There really needs to be a list of settings that new recruits can't access for a few games!

by **sensfan** on Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:19 am

pure awesomeness

by **TheForgivenOne** on Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:25 am

No need for necro-bumping.

by **00iCon** on Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:09 am

Late idea! Have a 'gang up' option in which all the players are on one team against the neutrals. Once they finish them all, it turns into a normal game with the other selected options.
Don't know if this was suggested, and also didn't think it thorough. In writing it sounds like a bad idea.

by **TheForgivenOne** on Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:16 am

00iCon wrote:Late idea! Have a 'gang up' option in which all the players are on one team against the neutrals. Once they finish them all, it turns into a normal game with the other selected options.
Don't know if this was suggested, and also didn't think it thorough. In writing it sounds like a bad idea.

This may be completely pointless on some maps, where with X amount of players, there may only be 2 neutrals. Or, on a starting map, where the whole map is basically neutrals.

by **00iCon** on Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:13 am

TheForgivenOne wrote:
00iCon wrote:Late idea! Have a 'gang up' option in which all the players are on one team against the neutrals. Once they finish them all, it turns into a normal game with the other selected options.
Don't know if this was suggested, and also didn't think it thorough. In writing it sounds like a bad idea.

This may be completely pointless on some maps, where with X amount of players, there may only be 2 neutrals. Or, on a starting map, where the whole map is basically neutrals.

for randomly distributed terr's, perhaps change it so 1/3 are neutral.

by **TheForgivenOne** on Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:18 am

I really doubt people would play fairly with that setting. Most players would just hit everyone else, then clean up the neutrals, then kill.

by **vrex** on Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:20 am

In the case of 2 players being attacked by Infected Territories, the territory that comes FIRST in the alphabet will be attacked first. For example. Angola will be attacked before Mongolia.

No ... this isn't correct, unless a couple conditions are satisfied

-the number of nuteral armies surrounding said players are the same
-(i think) the number of armies said players have must also be the same

THEN and only then is that statement true... i was one of the ones who posted a bunch here so i should know :geek:

please get rid of that edit... and im also curious, how long do things remain last call anyway?

by **TheForgivenOne** on Sat Feb 26, 2011 6:46 pm

vrex wrote:please get rid of that edit... and im also curious, how long do things remain last call anyway?

All depends on the Webmasters decision.

by **richardgarr** on Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:55 pm

I have been following this topic for a few years now, just wondering if it will ever get implemented?

by **tkr4lf** on Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:15 am

Gah...I would never play this.

by **richardgarr** on Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:21 pm

I am so hot to play this.... really would put this site above the rest.
I understand the work to maintain a script like this one would be insane, however I can see it as a challenge to those of us who enjoy multi-level play.