Forum

by **Woodruff** on Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:42 am

jefjef wrote:
TheForgivenOne wrote:1 game is not enough evidence to give out a warning.

It's pretty stupid that one game of this nature is enough to give out a "noted" for a situation of this nature. But there you have it.

by **chapcrap** on Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:52 am

Noted doesn't even mean anything.

by **jefjef** on Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:22 pm

chapcrap wrote:Noted doesn't even mean anything.

Well NOTED is like leaving it pending - un-official warning. Lets an offender know to curtail an activity.

by **chapcrap** on Tue Feb 21, 2012 1:39 pm

jefjef wrote:
chapcrap wrote:Noted doesn't even mean anything.

Well NOTED is like leaving it pending - un-official warning. Lets an offender know to curtail an activity.

Yeah, all I'm saying is Woodruff is getting bent out of shape over nothing.

by **Woodruff** on Tue Feb 21, 2012 5:56 pm

chapcrap wrote:Noted doesn't even mean anything.

Well that's certainly not true. If it didn't mean anything, then the moderators wouldn't do it because there would be no point to it.

chapcrap wrote:
jefjef wrote:
chapcrap wrote:Noted doesn't even mean anything.

Well NOTED is like leaving it pending - un-official warning. Lets an offender know to curtail an activity.

Yeah, all I'm saying is Woodruff is getting bent out of shape over nothing.

I don't believe I am. This will potentially be used as evidence against the guy when it's utterly ridiculous that it would be.

by **chapcrap** on Tue Feb 21, 2012 6:50 pm

It could potentially be used as evidence if it's a repeated offense. Then he could get a warning. If someone doesn't suicide all the time, then having it noted should be no issue to them.

by **Woodruff** on Tue Feb 21, 2012 11:25 pm

chapcrap wrote:It could potentially be used as evidence if it's a repeated offense. Then he could get a warning. If someone doesn't suicide all the time, then having it noted should be no issue to them.

That's my point! Having done it only once (and frankly, looking at that case, that "once" was HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE) resulted in a note. So if it were to happen ONCE MORE (again, potentially in a highly subjective situation), an individual could find themselves with a warning for having done nothing wrong at all. It's stupid. Reams of "evidence" are required in other situations...why would this one be any different? Is suiciding SERIOUSLY a worse problem than deadbeating such that it requires so little evidence? Is suiciding SERIOUSLY a worse problem than newbie-farming such that it requires so little evidence?

by **chapcrap** on Tue Feb 21, 2012 11:29 pm

Having a note doesn't necessarily require a warning if it's subjective again the next time. They just note it to go look at it later if something comes up in the future. It's really the start of compiling evidence. Nothing more. If someone is not a repeat offender, there is nothing to worry about.

by **DoomYoshi** on Wed Feb 22, 2012 3:09 am

To avoid the possibility of a suicide threat, just immediately suicide whenever you start a game.

Hmm... Don't want this thread to escalate further...

Just suicide before you join the Mae by dropping out.