Moderator: Cartographers
koontz1973 wrote:Heard anything about the size application yet?
koontz1973 wrote:cairns, 2 things before this map can go forward.koontz
- Firstly the sizing issue. This is a big concern at the moment and it looks like it will not be needed for this one. You have a 1000 in height but you need to get it down to the 800 limit. This should really not be to much hassle. It will make the map more square but this is a must right now.
- Secondly, this is going to be the last one allowed. That means no Rail Antarctica or Rail Mars etc.
koontz1973 wrote:...
As for the last one, even I have to say that this is not unique in any way now. As you know, that is one of the requirements for a new map. As for Rail North America, we already have Rail USA. Nothing unique about that at all.
koontz1973 wrote:You are right, nothing unique about map after map of the USA, but apart from the map pack, they are all different in certain aspects. USA, USA2.1, USapocalypse all cover the continental united states, all have different game play and looks. The others are all regions of the states. And again, apart from the pack, all are different from one another. The huge difference they all have over this series is that not only the looks have changed from one to another, the game play has changed.
I am not trotting out the uniqueness card here for the sake of it as we have lots of maps that have similar themes and similar styles, I bring it up as at some point we really will end up with Rail Mars or Rail Antarctica.
koontz1973 wrote:You had two last year.
isaiah40 wrote:The other one was collections.
cairnswk wrote:isaiah40 wrote:The other one was collections.
Thank-you isaiah40.
Is there any chance we can get these added to XML tutorial which is supposed to be our guide as to how do these updates for xml, please?
cairnswk wrote:Don't talk to me about uniqueness because this uniqueness BS thing gets trotted out whenever someone feels like getting on their fancy horse to make the site sound as though it has some unique qualities about it. Several have tried that one on me in the past and they no longer are here.
guidelines wrote:It's fine if you don't like this site or the way it is run...find another one with better rules, start another one and make your own rules, abuse another one and try to get them to change their rules, but don't complain about the rules here.
cairnswk wrote:New sizes will be:
Small: 800 x 850
Larage: 1040 x 1105
thenobodies80 wrote:
It's no more like when Lack allowed everything, forget that time. Now CAs really have the final say on things, you can like it or not, but this is how things will be done now.
Nobodies
thenobodies80 wrote:cairnswk wrote:isaiah40 wrote:The other one was collections.
Thank-you isaiah40.
Is there any chance we can get these added to XML tutorial which is supposed to be our guide as to how do these updates for xml, please?
Is there a chance you stop to demand things all days/all time? Let me say you're becoming annoying (and i'm not talking only about this, but also about other things that have left me really disappointed)
thenobodies80 wrote:cairnswk wrote:New sizes will be:
Small: 800 x 850
Larage: 1040 x 1105
btw, these sizes are ok.
And i don't beleive that red boys hold you back on these things, but rather your inadequecies as a good time manager.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt
thenobodies80 wrote:You right GH, sorry for not being able to bite my tongue. My fault.
Just...we're all full of him...really.
Sorry again
Nobodies
Seamus76 wrote:...
Edit: I like the design change. The towers have more of a modern feel to me. It is quite a change from the rest though, but it's cool.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users