Re: CC Religious Discrimination
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:28 pm
are some of official can answer on pool question? are Hindu swastika really forbidden here in CC ?
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=181173
qwert wrote:are some of official can answer on pool question? are Hindu swastika really forbidden here in CC ?
rdsrds2120 wrote:qwert wrote:are some of official can answer on pool question? are Hindu swastika really forbidden here in CC ?
Just like very few things on the site, it isn't strictly banned. This question dilutes the situation's context that bedub is talking about.
BMO
Gillipig wrote: As if just seeing that symbol would create great harm lol.
Funkyterrance wrote:Gillipig wrote: As if just seeing that symbol would create great harm lol.
In the context/scope of an online game, yes, it could create great harm. People trying to enjoy themselves and furthermore, paying for it, shouldn't have to be subjected to that shit.
Gillipig wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Gillipig wrote: As if just seeing that symbol would create great harm lol.
In the context/scope of an online game, yes, it could create great harm. People trying to enjoy themselves and furthermore, paying for it, shouldn't have to be subjected to that shit.
Another censorship lover, why won't you just wrap yourself in chains and be done with it?
Funkyterrance wrote:Gillipig wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Gillipig wrote: As if just seeing that symbol would create great harm lol.
In the context/scope of an online game, yes, it could create great harm. People trying to enjoy themselves and furthermore, paying for it, shouldn't have to be subjected to that shit.
Another censorship lover, why won't you just wrap yourself in chains and be done with it?
That was a thoughtful response.
Gillipig wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Gillipig wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Gillipig wrote: As if just seeing that symbol would create great harm lol.
In the context/scope of an online game, yes, it could create great harm. People trying to enjoy themselves and furthermore, paying for it, shouldn't have to be subjected to that shit.
Another censorship lover, why won't you just wrap yourself in chains and be done with it?
That was a thoughtful response.
It was, if you like censorship you probably like other constraints on your freedom as well, chains are constraints.
betiko wrote:I personally see no harm in the hindu swastika. I personally come from a country where proselitism of any religion is banned, and I think there is way too much on CC thougt.
Keep your faith to yourself, and don't spam people with it is all I would say.
Why would you need to put a religious symbol as an avatar anyway?
AndyDufresne wrote:Gillipig wrote:I don't like censorship in any way. So of course I'm against censoring a damn symbol. What's worse though is that male nipples are counted as nudity on here. Let me tell you, there's not a single country, however strict and old fashion it is, that considers male nipples to be nudity! But for some reason this silly site does. Unbefuckingleavable
If I recall correctly, male nipples are not nudity on CC. There is a whole topic with HOT+SEXY+MEN in the Off Topics. I think the line was drawn for "unambiguous nipples," as erotic as that sounds. I.E. if a moderator cannot tell, since the picture is cropped and it could go either way, that sort of image is prohibited.
--Andy
Funkyterrance wrote:betiko wrote:I personally see no harm in the hindu swastika. I personally come from a country where proselitism of any religion is banned, and I think there is way too much on CC thougt.
Keep your faith to yourself, and don't spam people with it is all I would say.
Why would you need to put a religious symbol as an avatar anyway?
This whole discussion started on a false pretense as a result of someone having a totenkopf in their avatar and eventually removed it as a gesture of goodwill when another player put up an Hindu swastika as a sort of "protest" to CC's standpoint on such matters; a tantrum of sorts. The fact of the matter is that no one was actually discriminated against on CC for their religion
That being said, if a symbol is considered offensive, even to one person, enough that said person files a complaint for the owner to take it down, I see this as reason enough for the owner to be a grown-up and change their avatar in the interest of the community as a whole.
I compare the whole business to the man running naked down the street complaining that it's unfair that he is made to put some clothes on; it's somewhat ridiculous and most definitely inconsiderate. No one needs to see that.
qwert wrote:Consider that mine topic in CA are locked, and quite strange that for these need to be discussed behind scene, what i think that its not ok, i need to ask question,and if i can not get answer here,then i will open new topic in QA forum
1.Are mods have tools to remove AVATAR and NAME of any player who have inapropriate avatar and inapropriate name.
----------------------------------------------
the reason for these question are simple- i find many Hitlers-Wafenn SS-Schutstaffel-NaziGermany- players,and if mods can only block player ,and all these stay(like Hitler avatar who salute you) , then you need to create some tool who will remove complete player out of site.
betiko wrote:qwert wrote:Consider that mine topic in CA are locked, and quite strange that for these need to be discussed behind scene, what i think that its not ok, i need to ask question,and if i can not get answer here,then i will open new topic in QA forum
1.Are mods have tools to remove AVATAR and NAME of any player who have inapropriate avatar and inapropriate name.
----------------------------------------------
the reason for these question are simple- i find many Hitlers-Wafenn SS-Schutstaffel-NaziGermany- players,and if mods can only block player ,and all these stay(like Hitler avatar who salute you) , then you need to create some tool who will remove complete player out of site.
are you calling mods "tools"?
Common CC Sense wrote:When someone distributes his message over more than two posts, he really doesn't have anything to say.