Timminz wrote:yrral wrote:Game 5162829
Nice one.09-06-27 21:41:09 - hoytdwow: I have to know. the 9 v 12 play: that was the best move you could think of?
2009-06-27 21:41:38 - hoytdwow: And then, THEN, the 7 v 9: after the 9 v 12 didn't work, you figured, hey, I'll try 7 v 9! This is your strategy?
2009-06-27 21:42:54 - yrral: just wanted to weaken you . did not even think it would be enough...
2009-06-27 21:45:24 - yrral: gg
2009-06-27 21:47:47 - hoytdwow: that's not very credible, larry.
2009-06-27 21:48:05 - hoytdwow: wanting to weaken someone is just taking one or two rolls...you went the full 9 v 12; 7 v 9.
2009-06-27 21:49:35 - yrral: game over, get over it.
2009-06-27 22:14:49 - hoytdwow: I'm over it. It's just that you're a liar is all
The best part is that that was a 1v1 game.
"How dare you attack my 12 stack?!"
you're right, high ranks are such crybaby's hoytdwow, btw, since when did lieutenant constitute a high rank?