[Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Changes

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderators: Global Moderators, Discussions Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

In Team Games, should you only be able to invite others as Teammates, removing all Opponent invites?

Yes
175
45%
No
214
55%
 
Total votes : 389

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby Teflon Kris on Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:08 am

Sorry, I've not read everything, but would suggest:

    No invitations for the other team in public games.

    Yes, definitely in private games. This is especially the case for things like clan war games (where it would be handy to have a Private Game Label too - although this is a seperate topic).

    Invitations for your own team in speed doubles (although this is really a seperate topic of speed invites).

:D
User avatar
Captain Teflon Kris
 
Posts: 3684
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom
Medals: 170
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (4)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (2) Bot Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (30)
General Achievement (14) Clan Achievement (19) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (32) General Contribution (8)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby stahrgazer on Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:29 pm

Nephilim wrote:(if you have to do something, i agree with dako: leave private invites as they are, it is nice and convenient. trash the public invites only)
peace


Devil's advocate: If you trash a public invite system, you're skewing the options toward premium players (freemie players cannot make private games). That may be what the site wants to do, one more reason to get premium "Look, with premium, you can send invites as well as set passwords." Of course, doing this will not prevent a premium player who wants to invite noobs to games, from creating private games and sending noobs the passwords.

I've still not seen an explanation of why the practice is considered an abuse if it's legal (not against any CC rules) to do.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby Leehar on Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:28 pm

stahrgazer wrote:
Nephilim wrote:(if you have to do something, i agree with dako: leave private invites as they are, it is nice and convenient. trash the public invites only)
peace


Devil's advocate: If you trash a public invite system, you're skewing the options toward premium players (freemie players cannot make private games). That may be what the site wants to do, one more reason to get premium "Look, with premium, you can send invites as well as set passwords." Of course, doing this will not prevent a premium player who wants to invite noobs to games, from creating private games and sending noobs the passwords.

I've still not seen an explanation of why the practice is considered an abuse if it's legal (not against any CC rules) to do.

I thought it was already the case that only premium people could send invites... I don't think I've ever seen a freemium invite as of yet....
I also could offer some examples of why abusing something has no direct relationship with legality, but I would have thought you'd be smart enough to figure it out by yourself..
Image
show
User avatar
Brigadier Leehar
Head Clan Director
Head Clan Director
 
Posts: 5960
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Graduation Ceremony
Medals: 125
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (21) Clan Achievement (13) Training Achievement (7) Challenge Achievement (1) General Contribution (8)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby stahrgazer on Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:06 pm

Leehar wrote:I also could offer some examples of why abusing something has no direct relationship with legality, but I would have thought you'd be smart enough to figure it out by yourself..


Could you, now? And here, I thought there was some sort of anti-abuse rule on CC. Hmmm, what was that rule, let me think
Unwritten Rules

Obviously any gross abuse of the game is forbidden. This includes but is not limited to: throwing games or deliberately benefiting from thrown games, intentional deadbeating, holding players hostage, serial teammate killing, hijacking accounts, systematically "farming" new recruits.


hmm...

So my point is, if whatever they're going to change the invite system from its current really convenient state to something less convenient, is supposedly being changed to prevent an ABUSE they don't want happening, then why aren't any of the standard anti-abuse disciplines being done, to limit the instances and maybe enable keeping a fairly convenient invite system as convenient as it currently is?
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby ender516 on Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:55 pm

I am not speaking in any official capacity here, but I think that a change to the mechanism of the site that would reduce or eliminate the unwanted behaviour automatically and impartially is far preferable to introducing a new rule, which would likely be enforced only upon complaint, subject to interpretation, and a further burden on the moderators.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
Tech Contributor
Tech Contributor
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Medals: 37
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (9)
Map Contribution (5) General Contribution (11)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby stahrgazer on Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:12 am

ender516 wrote:I am not speaking in any official capacity here, but I think that a change to the mechanism of the site that would reduce or eliminate the unwanted behaviour automatically and impartially is far preferable to introducing a new rule, which would likely be enforced only upon complaint, subject to interpretation, and a further burden on the moderators.


And I think it should be both or neither; if it's unwanted abuse, it should be disciplined. Apparently these folks think they found evidence that some sort of change is required; i.e. that someone is using the system to such a degree that it's being considered gross abuse enough to possibly require changing the system.

If it's not gross abuse enough to require discipline, then why change the system? If it doesn't matter enough to specifically warn people from doing it, well, I think there are other changes members would like to see in advance of something that isn't problem enough to enforce a rule about; especially when the change will eliminate one real nice convenience the site added - a convenience that has been very popular for all players, not just tournament organizers, not just clan members, not just premiums, but all players.

The logic I'm seeing here seems to be, "It's okay as long as it doesn't affect MY preferred games." This change is going to affect someone's preferred or occasional games... and why? To make something that, apparently, isn't even against the rules, impossible to do? I would understand the need for the change much more if what they're programming against was against the rules and that rule was being enforced.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby General Brewsie on Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:07 pm

I would not like to see the ability to invite opponents curtailed. Occasionally an opponent beats me so badly that I ask if he thinks he can do it twice in a row and I tell him to accept my invitation to give me another lesson in humility. These are usually darned good players and we end up with challenging, interesting matches.

I say please don't take that fun out of the games.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class General Brewsie
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 2:11 pm
Location: Seville, Spain
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (6) General Contribution (1)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:08 am

Thanks for all the feedback so far, especially the comments included in this topic.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
Retired Administrator
 
Posts: 25039
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Medals: 20
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) General Achievement (4) General Contribution (2)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby shocked439 on Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:30 am

If these abuses are garnering this much attention why should you punish those of us who use the invite system for legitimate purposes? Clearly define what an abuse of the invite system is, and enforce it. Or state the invite system is flawed but acceptable and no recent activities can be defined as abuse. Restricting it in it's entirety does not seem fair to 97% of the site.
Image
bad dice happen to good players
...We'll roll up a mighty score never give in, shoulder to shoulder we will fight, fight, fightfightfight!
User avatar
Lieutenant shocked439
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado
Medals: 28
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (1) General Achievement (2)
Clan Achievement (3)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby Slaylark on Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:41 pm

stahrgazer wrote:
ender516 wrote:I am not speaking in any official capacity here, but I think that a change to the mechanism of the site that would reduce or eliminate the unwanted behaviour automatically and impartially is far preferable to introducing a new rule, which would likely be enforced only upon complaint, subject to interpretation, and a further burden on the moderators.


And I think it should be both or neither; if it's unwanted abuse, it should be disciplined. Apparently these folks think they found evidence that some sort of change is required; i.e. that someone is using the system to such a degree that it's being considered gross abuse enough to possibly require changing the system.

If it's not gross abuse enough to require discipline, then why change the system? If it doesn't matter enough to specifically warn people from doing it, well, I think there are other changes members would like to see in advance of something that isn't problem enough to enforce a rule about; especially when the change will eliminate one real nice convenience the site added - a convenience that has been very popular for all players, not just tournament organizers, not just clan members, not just premiums, but all players.

The logic I'm seeing here seems to be, "It's okay as long as it doesn't affect MY preferred games." This change is going to affect someone's preferred or occasional games... and why? To make something that, apparently, isn't even against the rules, impossible to do? I would understand the need for the change much more if what they're programming against was against the rules and that rule was being enforced.



everything stahr has argued is valid and correct. I couldnt agree more.. well said Stahr.
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Captain Slaylark
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:09 pm
Location: New York
Medals: 84
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (2) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (6)
General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (12)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby JP007 on Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:59 pm

double ditto on the Slaylark and Stahrgazer wrote above.
I have not EVER seen any problems or abuse what so ever with the invite system since it was implemented.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class JP007
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas, USA
Medals: 48
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (8) Clan Achievement (10)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby Big Yuma Ripper on Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:34 pm

shocked439 wrote:If these abuses are garnering this much attention why should you punish those of us who use the invite system for legitimate purposes? Clearly define what an abuse of the invite system is, and enforce it. Or state the invite system is flawed but acceptable and no recent activities can be defined as abuse. Restricting it in it's entirety does not seem fair to 97% of the site.



Just seen this, agree with what is said above, Don't let a few cheap scats ruin it for everybody else :evil:
Image
User avatar
Colonel Big Yuma Ripper
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:09 pm
Location: Tennessee....
Medals: 36
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (6)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby BoganGod on Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:46 am

Sorry folks, haven't taken the time to read through all posted here, time poor at present need sleep. Though there are some abusing the invite system, the system as it stands works fine. Maybe the guidelines/rules could be adjusted to ban some of the more unsavoury invite practises. I use the invite system mainly to invite teammates, but is very useful to invite the other team. For example if I've arranged to play a private quads against a few decent players from another clan, rather than exchanging password etc. I just send invite to first player who invites the rest of the team, I'm sure other people use invite system the same way. Would be a shame to see something that is working dicked around with because of a few bad eggs. I fully understand that the rules must fit all, but as requested previously in this mini essay maybe tighten up the rules rather than changing the system. Thats my 2cents worth. Bogan out
Image
User avatar
Major BoganGod
 
Posts: 2876
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:08 am
Location: At the local dog park
Medals: 90
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (14) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (13)
Tournament Contribution (10) General Contribution (3)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby macbone on Sun Sep 19, 2010 4:33 am

I sometimes invite friends to play against them in team games, but making the game a Private game would accomplish the same end, and I wouldn't mind. I voted no to the change, but if the abuses are that egregious, then I won't complain loudly if the system's changed. =)
User avatar
Major macbone
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 5270
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:12 pm
Location: Looking out over Victoria Harbor, thinking about Middle Earth and how good my wife looks
Medals: 75
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (8) General Achievement (8) Clan Achievement (9)
Training Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (2) General Contribution (7)

Re: [Feedback] Invitations, Abuse, Changes and Possible Chan

Postby stahrgazer on Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:24 am

macbone wrote:I sometimes invite friends to play against them in team games, but making the game a Private game would accomplish the same end, and I wouldn't mind. I voted no to the change, but if the abuses are that egregious, then I won't complain loudly if the system's changed. =)


I agree with you here; but I still wonder, if the abuses ARE that egregious, why is there no rule and disciplines going on for those known instances?

Can't say mods and such don't have time to look and merit the whippings, if someone looked enough to find enough evidence to think a system program needs to prevent it.

I'd really like to see a rule and attempts at the discipline to curb the trend, BEFORE a program change that reduces convenience to a majority of others.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (7)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: the warrior65 and 1 guest

Login