[Feedback Request] New Round Limits? (NEW POLL)

[cairnswk]

I agree with more increments in the lower range, but I think leaving a 100 round limit would not be bad. Can we have 20, 30, 40, 50, 100?

If we can't, then drop the 100 and just use more lower limits.

I agree with this.

+1

+1

+1

[saaimen]

I'd vote for:

None, 20, 30, 50, 100

This way, we keep the 100, and keep 20 and 30 (which are often used in tournaments). I haven't often run into a 40 round limitation.

Oh and btw: losing the 100 could be dangerous.
You say only 0.1% reaches 100. But you'd cut at 50... How big a percentage hits 50 rounds?


Edit:
Whoops, MudPuppy kinda said the exact same thing already... Guess we must have a point

[Leehar]

Is it possible for any mods/admins here to extend the poll to include some of the other suggestions here? I would definitely vote for some of them more than the current options.

(I quite like 15, 30, 60, 100 )

[lackattack]

Added None, 20, 30, 50, 100 to the poll and enabled change of vote

[frankiebee]

100 limit should be there.
When a 50 rounds limit game hits round 40, people will allready play different because of the round limit of 50. It is not that exceptional for a game to hit 40 rounds, therefore, 100 should be a good option.

[sundance123]

What percent of games make it to 50 rounds?

[D00MandD3A7H]

Would like to see one of them at the 10 round range, so as to make this a really interesting option in games.

10, 20, 30, 40, 50 would be my preference. But as that is not an option in the poll, voted for the top one. 100 seems silly as, as you said, only 0.1% of games get that far.

10 rounds. I Love the idea. Would be useful for speed, hence Speed games shouldnt last 1 hour or longer.

Different topic, Speed games option of 3 minute turns would be awesome. 5 minutes seems to be a lot of time wasted.

[chapcrap]

Added None, 20, 30, 50, 100 to the poll and enabled change of vote

Good. Something on the lower end of things was definitely needed.

I agree with Kuma's suggestion of a drop down box or a typed in number where you could set your own round limit for every game. Just make 10 the minimum for sure.

For those that voted for the option with NONE, 20, 50, 100: why didn't you want 30 to be in there?

[DiM]

i'd like to be able to set any round limit i want.
also i'd like to see the option of setting a round limit to games that have already started but do not have a limit set. it would be great for current stalemates.

[grifftron]

I voted 3rd option, but seriously.. just make a medal for this and all will be happy.

[Victor Sullivan]

I voted 3rd option, but seriously.. just make a medal for this and all will be happy.

Honestly, I'd be against medals for the Round Limit feature. Round Limits should be used more as a functional thing than a medal-hunting thing, if that makes sense.

-Sully

[squishyg]

Definitely keep 100 rounds!! My favorite games usually last at least that long.

Why not just 30, 50, 100? 20 rounds is nothing!

[gorehound]

So what exactly would happen when the game reaches the limit? How would winners and sequences be determined? Or would all lose?

[General Brewsie]

Definitely keep 100 rounds!! My favorite games usually last at least that long.

Why not just 30, 50, 100? 20 rounds is nothing!

I agree with squishyg. Well, 20 games is a bit long for some maps, but it's not an unreasonable number, so it should not be included in the possible limits. The other three options are very reasonable, however.

But I too wonder what will happen when the limit is reached.

[DiM]

But I too wonder what will happen when the limit is reached.

So what exactly would happen when the game reaches the limit? How would winners and sequences be determined? Or would all lose?

read here: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=153794