Master Bush wrote:
For every MLK in this world, there is a Malcolm X who has been just as influential ,doing things others didn't find "honorable"
Yeah but they dont have a holiday for malcom X, therefore MLK in better.
Moderators: Global Moderators, Discussions Team
Master Bush wrote:
For every MLK in this world, there is a Malcolm X who has been just as influential ,doing things others didn't find "honorable"

Master Bush wrote:Holidays are lame. Which one has the best movie made about him
-X

Uncle Death wrote:Master Bush wrote:Holidays are lame. Which one has the best movie made about him
-X
Why are so frivolous about an issue you have made so much about? This proves my point that you hurt the cause if you ever believed in it. Shame on you. You are nothing but an agent provocetuer helping the cause you proclaim to be against. Here you are spouting off and COF who had a good argument is left silenced.

Master Bush wrote:For every MLK in this world, there is a Malcolm X who has been just as influential ,doing things others didn't find "honorable"


owenshooter wrote:=D>![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Night Strike wrote:GLG complains about anyone who questions his form of play. The one comment that CoF was noted for making was completely clean and should have never even been noted, muchless used as a basis for a ban. But since GLG is favored by some of the mods, he goes whining and crying to them in order to get them to do his bidding (in this case banning those who disagree with him). If CoF made other bannable posts in that thread, they should have been recorded or at least linked to, because the only citation I can see is completely clean.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it doesn't happen often, but i love when i agree with NS...-el Jesus negro

cachejob wrote:as far as CoF's ban, i don't know enough about the original posts to comment on it. however, CoF tends to be articulate and well spoken and is able to get his point across without resorting to bananable offenses.
trapyoung wrote:cachejob wrote:as far as CoF's ban, i don't know enough about the original posts to comment on it. however, CoF tends to be articulate and well spoken and is able to get his point across without resorting to bananable offenses.
In before Andy


nippersean wrote:Well this is just plain bollocks. Yeah COF's green shirt sucks balls. But can someone direct me to the offensive comments. Total bullshit. Ridiculous.



Chariot of Fire wrote:All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest