Conquer Club

I've always suspected the dice stats were bullshit - found it odd how almost everyone was sitting around 0%.

Starting watching more closely and noticed thigns not adding up. Then tonight my opponent hits a neutral and then 3 of mine that had 2 troops apiece on them - stats show 1 win 5 losses on 3v2 .... pure bullshit.

thats my rant - and I stick to it ... not the first time I have seen discrepencies either.

donkeymile wrote:I've always suspected the dice stats were bullshit - found it odd how almost everyone was sitting around 0%.

Starting watching more closely and noticed thigns not adding up. Then tonight my opponent hits a neutral and then 3 of mine that had 2 troops apiece on them - stats show 1 win 5 losses on 3v2 .... pure bullshit.

thats my rant - and I stick to it ... not the first time I have seen discrepencies either.

LOL your not supposed to notice when your getting screwed or mention it. Its considered crass.

3v2 loses a lot. Sorry that your random dice are rigged, but that's just the way it is. Dice are assholes! But stop fucking complaining.

THATS your comment? That 3v2 loses a lot? That makes no sense!

Gabriel13 wrote:3v2 loses a lot. Sorry that your random dice are rigged, but that's just the way it is. Dice are assholes! But stop fucking complaining.

Read the thread before you comment, he isn't complaining about his dice, he's complaining about the dice stats feature.

jammyjames wrote:

Gabriel13 wrote:3v2 loses a lot. Sorry that your random dice are rigged, but that's just the way it is. Dice are assholes! But stop fucking complaining.

Read the thread before you comment, he isn't complaining about his dice, he's complaining about the dice stats feature.

has community fallen so deep that we now need a tl;dr for a tl;dr?

tl;dr only nerds read nowadays

dr;tl;dr;

Whut he say?

Viceroy63 wrote:Whut he say?

Reads like Double Dutch to me..

As if I needed more proof tonight ...

Watched my opponent take 25v15 and his dice stats showed 3v2 - 0 wins 0 losses.

Just a small taste of what I have personally witnessed, not including others who have see the same type of thing.

Odd how we're all about 0% but these strange 'anomolies' keep appearing or not appearing in my dice stats ....

It's true...the stats how ever they have been programmed are false.

So I will not click on the wasted Dice Stats again...so wrong CC

86

The scientists working on CC Intensity Cube Theory have made a breakthrough.

Dude, you are WAY behind the 8 ball on this one xD. you see, your opponent gets good dice, then when you are screwed and have 4-5 territories left (on a map such as say, classic) you beat 3's with 2's and 6's with 4's and such, thus, evening out the sice. THAT my good friend, is how CC bullshit dice's you.

donkeymile wrote:As if I needed more proof tonight ...

Watched my opponent take 25v15 and his dice stats showed 3v2 - 0 wins 0 losses.

Just a small taste of what I have personally witnessed, not including others who have see the same type of thing.

Odd how we're all about 0% but these strange 'anomolies' keep appearing or not appearing in my dice stats ....

holy shit.. who cares you little child? just play the fuckin game.

rhp 1 - your small little mind can't even try to comprehend what I'm trying to say so just go back to being one of the mindless sheep and play your games ...

I'll snap my fingers when I need another worthless thought of yours to make me smile and be thankful for getting a brain when there are others like you who clearly were missed.

I would love it if everyone would shut the f*ck up about the dice. I'm glad chess doesn't deal with dice because those players are a lot more though not completely accepting of losses being their own damn fault.

Damn I wish that they would come up with a more appropriate name for this game we play based on the risk that is inherent in attacking and defending...

And go tell the English that they had lucky dice at the Battle of Agincourt in 1415, after all they were greatly outnumbered by the French...

Dibbun wrote:I would love it if everyone would shut the f*ck up about the dice. I'm glad chess doesn't deal with dice because those players are a lot more though not completely accepting of losses being their own damn fault.

Damn I wish that they would come up with a more appropriate name for this game we play based on the risk that is inherent in attacking and defending...

And go tell the English that they had lucky dice at the Battle of Agincourt in 1415, after all they were greatly outnumbered by the French...

Well said,cc is a dice based game ffs,if you don't like dice based games,don't play it,could not be simpler..

None of you understand what the OP said..the stats over on you left of the page- clue those that have no knowledge. It says Dice Stats, click on this and believe what it says sheeple- People unable to think for themselves. Followers. Lemmings. Those with no cognitive ablilities of their own.

They are not accurate and contain many errors. That's what donkeymile is saying and he is right!!

86

It's a huge conspiracy. Lack is smuggling the unaccounted for dices and selling them on the black market.
You guys should shut up about it if you know what's good for you.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:It's a huge conspiracy. Lack is smuggling the unaccounted for dices and selling them on the black market.
You guys should shut up about it if you know what's good for you.

Here is a picture a stealthy Dispatch reporter took of the unaccounted dice stock pile:




--Andy

f*ck you monkey, you have no idea..get some coding behind you before you play the smart arse..gone from this site for good.

And Lack, poor coding..so many errors,

bye bye..yeah and don't let the door hit me on the way back..truly this site sucks

86

I'm pretty sure this is exactly what happened in Office Space.

Oh, and Agent 86, how the f*ck could you think anyone cared? Gtfo.

Agent 86 wrote:f*ck you monkey, you have no idea..get some coding behind you before you play the smart arse..gone from this site for good.

And Lack, poor coding..so many errors,

bye bye..yeah and don't let the door hit me on the way back..truly this site sucks

86

Is there any proof you would accept that the dice aren't manipulated or 'poorly coded' whatever that means? What do you have in mind?


--Andy

donkeymile wrote:rhp 1 - your small little mind can't even try to comprehend what I'm trying to say so just go back to being one of the mindless sheep and play your games ...

I'll snap my fingers when I need another worthless thought of yours to make me smile and be thankful for getting a brain when there are others like you who clearly were missed.

yea.. you're brilliant... complaining about dice stat accuracy on a gaming website... man.. wish I cared as much as you.. now snap your fingers and get over yourself...

Agent 86 wrote:f*ck you monkey, you have no idea..get some coding behind you before you play the smart arse..gone from this site for good.

And Lack, poor coding..so many errors,

bye bye..yeah and don't let the door hit me on the way back..truly this site sucks

86

who cares?

the only thing I will say about the dice stats (the reason i'm not a big fan of them) is that most people simply look at the % +/- and make conclusions based on that... in other words, they see -20% attacking and think they've had horrible dice... the % says nothing about what actually took place in any particular battle... you could be rolling all 2's which gives you a poor % but if your opponents rolling 1's you're still winning the battles... all and all, dice stats are worthless... take the game less seriously and just play

a couple weeks ago I looked at mine and it said -70% attack and -45% defend.... it was right in the middle of me winning about 15 games in a row...