Gandalf the Grey, Is this guy a wizard or what? He's only finished 1 game, he lost it, but is still at 1000 points! Kudos if you can figure out how that's possible without looking at the game or reading others suggestions.
Moderator: Community Team
Gillipig wrote:Gandalf the Grey, Is this guy a wizard or what? He's only finished 1 game, he lost it, but is still at 1000 points! Kudos if you can figure out how that's possible without looking at the game or reading others suggestions.
deathcomesrippin wrote:That was a terrible movie. I saw it last night and almost left the theater.
Gillipig wrote:deathcomesrippin wrote:That was a terrible movie. I saw it last night and almost left the theater.
Really? It has an 8.8 rating on imdb. And I'm planning to go see it next week! The Bilbo book is much much better than the lotr books, so I figure the movie can't be all that bad. The new Bond movie was a letdown I must admit though.
Gillipig wrote:deathcomesrippin wrote:That was a terrible movie. I saw it last night and almost left the theater.
Really? It has an 8.8 rating on imdb. And I'm planning to go see it next week! The Bilbo book is much much better than the lotr books, so I figure the movie can't be all that bad. The new Bond movie was a letdown I must admit though.
deathcomesrippin wrote:Gillipig wrote:deathcomesrippin wrote:That was a terrible movie. I saw it last night and almost left the theater.
Really? It has an 8.8 rating on imdb. And I'm planning to go see it next week! The Bilbo book is much much better than the lotr books, so I figure the movie can't be all that bad. The new Bond movie was a letdown I must admit though.
You take a book as long as one of the LotR books and you also make it a trilogy. I found LotR to be an extremely drawn out set of movies. This was torture. Plus, I saw it in HFR, and it looked like a 3D canadian program from the 80s. Terrible.
Foxglove wrote:deathcomesrippin wrote:Gillipig wrote:deathcomesrippin wrote:That was a terrible movie. I saw it last night and almost left the theater.
Really? It has an 8.8 rating on imdb. And I'm planning to go see it next week! The Bilbo book is much much better than the lotr books, so I figure the movie can't be all that bad. The new Bond movie was a letdown I must admit though.
You take a book as long as one of the LotR books and you also make it a trilogy. I found LotR to be an extremely drawn out set of movies. This was torture. Plus, I saw it in HFR, and it looked like a 3D canadian program from the 80s. Terrible.
Nooooooo don't ruin my dreams.
I still plan to see it.
Dukasaur wrote:So many of the wonderful subplots and secondary characters from LOTR were left out of the movies. It left me so disappointed not to see Bombadil or Quickbeam or Glorfindel, and especially I missed the Scouring of the Shire.
Dukasaur wrote:The only people who complain the movies were too long were people who weren't fans to begin with. Any true fan would rather have seen the LOTR movies expanded to seven or eight movies so all the great scenes from the books could have been included. The Council of Elrond (for instance) should by itself be one movie so all the stories told by all the visitors to the Council can be played out in full.
So many of the wonderful subplots and secondary characters from LOTR were left out of the movies. It left me so disappointed not to see Bombadil or Quickbeam or Glorfindel, and especially I missed the Scouring of the Shire. If it's true that the movie to book ratio for the Hobbit is higher, then I expect a big improvement.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users