codeblue1018 wrote:xiangwang, you "gave" him conqueror status. Kiron, I get it that it was one game that you employed these tactics and yes there will be haters; there always will be. I find it hard to believe that what you did and how you attained your rank-up you didn't think it was shady or against the rules. I mean, really? Clearly you're a strong player; that isn't the issue. The issue is how you won that game; it was shady and frankly against the rules. The old, I've been the victim of it many times, so it must be legit is a very absurd response. How did you think of these tactics when they happened to you "many" times. You didn't think this was cheap or perhaps a rule violation? C'mon mate; of course you did.
betiko wrote:still seems like a more legit conqueror than rabbitonto me, mostly if he's been the victim of this more that he's taken advantage of it. nevertheless, i think people should stop doing that.
Kiron wrote:C'mon it was one game where an honest mistake was made regarding the understanding of making deals considering I have been victim of these past deals many times (just assumed it was okay, not the best excuse, but mistakes happen). It's as though I have been making these deals the entire time to climb up the ranks. Oh well, haters will be haters
Users browsing this forum: a6mzero and 1 guest