(Thread of CC Records) 1st 5's & TOP 5's

[Blitzaholic]

To HA and or others, this is what I had for most games at one time:

Top 5 with most active games at one time

1. Army of nobunaga 1282
2. Highlanderattack 1250
3. Heatz 843
4. Hotdoggie 430
5. Shoop76 330


Is this accurate or did someone recently go for more?

[HighlanderAttack]

no one that I know of has went for more than those

And of the top three --all of them missed turns during the stretch--and AoN and heatz both dropped to cook while I only dropped to srgt and played most of them as a major

[army of nobunaga]

ha why do you go from thread to thread and try to undercut my record? I took my turns at a higher rate than MY CURRENT MISSED TURNS RATE.
I missed about 20-30 turns in 10000 ... that is 10 +0+0+0 turns.. I missed at the most 30.

Try being a good sport.

[HighlanderAttack]

ha why do you go from thread to thread and try to undercut my record? I took my turns at a higher rate than MY CURRENT MISSED TURNS RATE.
I missed about 20-30 turns in 10000 ... that is 10 +0+0+0 turns.. I missed at the most 30.

Try being a good sport.

Just stating the facts--what did you reach 400 point cook was it?

I believe you missed many more than you that anyway--no way to prove it though.


edit--and I also stated I missed turns--and I am only stating to my knowledge what occurred for all three players

Since we all missed turns the record is not pure. I was able to keep rank for most of my games--that is the only difference in the record that is clear.

And being that you are one of the most vulgar players on this site don't tell me I am being a bad sport about your record--laughable

[Blitzaholic]

ha why do you go from thread to thread and try to undercut my record? I took my turns at a higher rate than MY CURRENT MISSED TURNS RATE.
I missed about 20-30 turns in 10000 ... that is 10 +0+0+0 turns.. I missed at the most 30.

Try being a good sport.

Just stating the facts--what did you reach 400 point cook was it?

I believe you missed many more than you that anyway--no way to prove it though.


edit--and I also stated I missed turns--and I am only stating to my knowledge what occurred for all three players

Since we all missed turns the record is not pure. I was able to keep rank for most of my games--that is the only difference in the record that is clear.

And being that you are one of the most vulgar players on this site don't tell me I am being a bad sport about your record--laughable

ok guys, let refocus, is this top 5 accurate as far as you know?

1. Army of nobunaga 1282
2. Highlanderattack 1250
3. Heatz 843
4. Hotdoggie 430
5. Shoop76 330

[Bones2484]

HA, you do realize that you dropping down to a Sergeant is equivalent to AoN dropping down to a cook? He's no where near as good of a player as you and started his run at a much lower rank than you did.

[Blitzaholic]

HA, you do realize that you dropping down to a Sergeant is equivalent to AoN dropping down to a cook? He's no where near as good of a player as you and started his run at a much lower rank than you did.

Not completely correct here bones. You lose a lot more points for a loss the higher your score is, but, you never really got so high, so I guess I would not expect you to know this.

Now, back to the original question, is the top 5 more most games played at one time accurate or was their a recent change?

[Gilligan]

HA, you do realize that you dropping down to a Sergeant is equivalent to AoN dropping down to a cook? He's no where near as good of a player as you and started his run at a much lower rank than you did.

Not completely correct here bones. You lose a lot more points for a loss the higher your score is, but, you never really got so high, so I guess I would not expect you to know this.

Now, back to the original question, is the top 5 more most games played at one time accurate or was their a recent change?

I guess Colonel is a piece of shit rank nowadays....sigh....

[ljex]

HA, you do realize that you dropping down to a Sergeant is equivalent to AoN dropping down to a cook? He's no where near as good of a player as you and started his run at a much lower rank than you did.

Not completely correct here bones. You lose a lot more points for a loss the higher your score is, but, you never really got so high, so I guess I would not expect you to know this.

Now, back to the original question, is the top 5 more most games played at one time accurate or was their a recent change?

Blitz i think what he is saying is that both players lost about 600 points from their score when playing this many games.

[Bones2484]

HA, you do realize that you dropping down to a Sergeant is equivalent to AoN dropping down to a cook? He's no where near as good of a player as you and started his run at a much lower rank than you did.

Not completely correct here bones. You lose a lot more points for a loss the higher your score is, but, you never really got so high, so I guess I would not expect you to know this.

Now, back to the original question, is the top 5 more most games played at one time accurate or was their a recent change?

I guess Colonel is a piece of shit rank nowadays....sigh....

Funny thing is that Blitz never kept a crown or higher when he was playing legit tournaments, he always had swords or lower. Only way he got a "high" rank was by quitting real tournaments and either farming public games or farming his pathetic quads tournaments. I'm much prouder of my crown playing every type of tournament than I'm sure Blitz is of Conquerer playing unorganized noobs on Pelopponesian.

And Blitz, my analysis IS accurate. A better player (HA) will win more games than a worse player (AoN) which would offset the "higher score point loss".

Yes Blitz, the list is accurate.

[Blitzaholic]

HA, you do realize that you dropping down to a Sergeant is equivalent to AoN dropping down to a cook? He's no where near as good of a player as you and started his run at a much lower rank than you did.

Not completely correct here bones. You lose a lot more points for a loss the higher your score is, but, you never really got so high, so I guess I would not expect you to know this.

Now, back to the original question, is the top 5 more most games played at one time accurate or was their a recent change?

Blitz i think what he is saying is that both players lost about 600 points from their score when playing this many games.

ok, but, if they both played around the same level of competition and ranks out in public, it is easier for HA to lose more in score, this is the point I am trying to make. It is not quite the same, and HA I think is trying to say his was a better achievement, although it is crazy for me to think about that massive amount of games at one time, so, both should be applauded.

[Bones2484]

ok, but, if they both played around the same level of competition and ranks out in public, it is easier for HA to lose more in score, this is the point I am trying to make. It is not quite the same, and HA I think is trying to say his was a better achievement, although it is crazy for me to think about that massive amount of games at one time, so, both should be applauded.

Except for, you know, the DRAMATIC difference in winning percentage between the two. 33% for AoN and 52% for HA. Thus it's easier for HA to win some of those points back since he's clearly a better player.

HA's point is not about AoN's score, it's about AoN missing turns.

[Blitzaholic]

ok, but, if they both played around the same level of competition and ranks out in public, it is easier for HA to lose more in score, this is the point I am trying to make. It is not quite the same, and HA I think is trying to say his was a better achievement, although it is crazy for me to think about that massive amount of games at one time, so, both should be applauded.

Except for, you know, the DRAMATIC difference in winning percentage between the two. 33% for AoN and 52% for HA. Thus it's easier for HA to win some of those points back since he's clearly a better player.

HA's point is not about AoN's score, it's about AoN missing turns.

thx for proofing my point, they both lost around 600 points and HA won at 52% and AoN 33%.

[ljex]

ok, but, if they both played around the same level of competition and ranks out in public, it is easier for HA to lose more in score, this is the point I am trying to make. It is not quite the same, and HA I think is trying to say his was a better achievement, although it is crazy for me to think about that massive amount of games at one time, so, both should be applauded.

Except for, you know, the DRAMATIC difference in winning percentage between the two. 33% for AoN and 52% for HA. Thus it's easier for HA to win some of those points back since he's clearly a better player.

HA's point is not about AoN's score, it's about AoN missing turns.

well throwing percentages out means nothing in this case, aon plays way more multi player games than HA does, HA plays almost all 1 vs 1

[Gilligan]

ok, but, if they both played around the same level of competition and ranks out in public, it is easier for HA to lose more in score, this is the point I am trying to make. It is not quite the same, and HA I think is trying to say his was a better achievement, although it is crazy for me to think about that massive amount of games at one time, so, both should be applauded.

Except for, you know, the DRAMATIC difference in winning percentage between the two. 33% for AoN and 52% for HA. Thus it's easier for HA to win some of those points back since he's clearly a better player.

HA's point is not about AoN's score, it's about AoN missing turns.

thx for proofing my point, they both lost around 600 points and HA won at 52% and AoN 33%.

He won 52% overall, not from the 1000 odd simultaneous games played....