Forum

by **lokisgal** on Sat Apr 23, 2011 6:46 pm

he would put a * next to the persons name - dont know if he will do that to himself.......

by **DoomYoshi** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:16 am

Top 5 Aged People:
danfrank:102
J.C. I Rocc: 101
Thai Robert: 101
More to come

by **nagerous** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:32 am

DoomYoshi wrote:Top 5 Aged People:
danfrank:102
J.C. I Rocc: 101
Thai Robert: 101
More to come

I imagine those to be fake ages.

by **DoomYoshi** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:12 pm

nagerous wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:Top 5 Aged People:
danfrank:102
J.C. I Rocc: 101
Thai Robert: 101
More to come

I imagine those to be fake ages.

Right, asterisks all around then.

by **Robinette** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:23 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Who is going to spend the time to add all the " * " ?

heheheeee...

this actually could lead to the creation of a new Top 5 category...

Top 5 with the most " * "

by **White Moose** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:06 pm

He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

by **Rodion** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:24 pm

White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

He'll make a distinction between "cheating to achieve a record" and "cheating after achieving the record". That distinction will save him from asterisks or deletions, obviously, since this is his thread.

by **White Moose** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 4:26 pm

Rodion wrote:
White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

He'll make a distinction between "cheating to achieve a record" and "cheating after achieving the record". That distinction will save him from asterisks or deletions, obviously, since this is his thread.

Probably

by **Robinette** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:28 pm

White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,

Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes

and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...

So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

by **Fruitcake** on Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:35 pm

Robinette wrote:
White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,
Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes

and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...

So is what Blitz has done considered mild hypocrisy? or was it outright duplicity?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

Fixed.

Have an egg on me.

by **JOHNNYROCKET24** on Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:19 pm

Robinette wrote:
White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,
Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes

and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...

So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

deleted players are probably these

Warsteiner/Switchfoot/Renegades- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=69031
Dminus- multi
Krusher- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=34031&hilit=krusher+busted
KIDPAT- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=52930&hilit=kidpat+busted
Hotblondewithbod- viewtopic.php?f=6&t=46418&hilit=Hotblondewithbod&start=45
Maxatstuy- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=68165&hilit=Maxatstuy
Jesusreigns/JCKing- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=67208&p=1652591&hilit=+krusher#p1652591
Ramned/the egg- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=75958&hilit=rammed
muld00n- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=77689&p=1847718#p1847718
PInocheckio/Peter Pan - viewtopic.php?f=239&t=69744&p=1710900&hilit=PInocheckio+busted#p1710900
BENJIKAT/BENJIKAT IS DEAD- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=41101&hilit=benji&start=15
lanyards- multi ( no thread available )
MOBAJOBG- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=93694&hilit=farm
KraphtOne- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100025
EagleofGreenErth- viewtopic.php?f=239&t=102943

by **PLAYER57832** on Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:14 pm

DoomYoshi wrote:Top 5 Aged People:
danfrank:102
J.C. I Rocc: 101
Thai Robert: 101
More to come

I must be the youngest.... my profile says 1

Website · by **demonfork** on Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:18 am

Robinette wrote:
White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,
Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes

and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...

So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

The accusation made against herp and myself and the resulting "stern warning" given (after a second evaluation, first go we were cleared and noted) was for verbal "abuse" and not for cheating...

herps was bestowed with his beloved asterisk long before this "abuse" case ever made it to C&A.

As far as sitz's case...he was busted for cheating not abuse...therefore he needs to remove his own ass from his own list.

by **JOHNNYROCKET24** on Sun May 22, 2011 10:07 am

I figured I would bump this to the top so sitteraholic could update it upon his return. Since he nothing to work on the past month but this, it should only take a couple seconds to provide us with this much needed information.

by **King_Herpes** on Sun May 22, 2011 7:30 pm

demonfork wrote:
Robinette wrote:
White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.

OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

I am confused...

So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,
Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!

So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...

skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0

Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.

King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes

and i compared those to recent events...

Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...

So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...

The accusation made against herp and myself and the resulting "stern warning" given (after a second evaluation, first go we were cleared and noted) was for verbal "abuse" and not for cheating...

herps was bestowed with his beloved asterisk long before this "abuse" case ever made it to C&A.

As far as sitz's case...he was busted for cheating not abuse...therefore he needs to remove his own ass from his own list.

Blitz* actually told me* that he* denounced my name due to an ancient incident in which I* had sent an instant invite link into a difficult map via private message. Two invisible people were sent the invite, one of which I* had met in live chat.

What he* had misrenembered to acknowledge during *our* private moment of confidence was that people were waiting for me* to slip up for quite some time. He* was merely carrying out his duly duties of catering to the cries of the public. He* always meets the public's needs. You* invisible people are uneducated on the matter simply because the mass paranoia machine that is....... 'Duuuhnnndugnduuuuhhhhnnnn'!!!!!!!! CHEATING & ABUSE!!!1!!!ONEHUNDREDANDELEVEN! never broadcasted it. That is because I* neutralized it using clutch skills of diplomacy and beurocratic lobbying that I* previously had learnt from engaging in the game of RISK®.

Okay okay I* put the guys kid through college, get over it!!

I* believe I* was petting my cat angrily while cursing at the monitor in my Mother's basement, pulling my hair out, gritting my teeth and wearing open sores on my palms from clenching my fist in disbelief of the di when Blitz* despairingly gave it reason. My eyes turned red. I* tore out my cats diminutive spine and ate it's innards in what was somewhat of an overreaction. You see my invisible friends, upon reflection I* miss my little kitty. I* also miss the days where players waited until referees(moderus adminii) made the call.

As many people noted to point out before me*, this is just a list compiled from one players perspective. Never meant jack dick to me*. He* can take mine off and give himself** two for all I care.