Conquer Club

CC's 22 CONQUERORs

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Re: CC's 15 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Sat May 30, 2009 1:24 pm

sully800 wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:anyways, 9 months later and still no changes


No changes, except KH should have a hell of a lot more days than 29....



nope, not that i recall, him and sjnap switched leads several times, he may be over 29 currrently, anyone know when sjnap most recently lost his spot?
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Sat May 30, 2009 1:25 pm

sjnap wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
Scott-Land wrote:Maybe categorize the speed players too Blitzy.... I played 8s to get there and team to milk it. Snapo gained most of his points in casual freestyle team. I suppose he did play quite a few speeds when wen were battling it out but it was prolly 99% team games.




done


you notice anything else or other suggestions, let me know, thx



Hmmm..normally i dont care about statistics..but this time i need to clarify something once again.
When i made it to Conqueror first time I did it by seq games. Most of these sequantial games were 6 and 8 sequantial escalating games. So not by freestyle teamgames.
Later on to reach my topscore i did it by mostly freestyle teamgames idd.
But i thought this thread was about getting conqueror ?!




ok sjnap, I will change it
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby sjnap on Sat May 30, 2009 6:56 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:
sjnap wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
Scott-Land wrote:Maybe categorize the speed players too Blitzy.... I played 8s to get there and team to milk it. Snapo gained most of his points in casual freestyle team. I suppose he did play quite a few speeds when wen were battling it out but it was prolly 99% team games.




done


you notice anything else or other suggestions, let me know, thx



Hmmm..normally i dont care about statistics..but this time i need to clarify something once again.
When i made it to Conqueror first time I did it by seq games. Most of these sequantial games were 6 and 8 sequantial escalating games. So not by freestyle teamgames.
Later on to reach my topscore i did it by mostly freestyle teamgames idd.
But i thought this thread was about getting conqueror ?!




ok sjnap, I will change it


thank u my friend O:)
oh btw...I still luv ya :mrgreen:
Brigadier sjnap
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:30 pm

Re: CC's 15 CONQUEROR's

Postby sjnap on Sat May 30, 2009 6:57 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:
sully800 wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:anyways, 9 months later and still no changes


No changes, except KH should have a hell of a lot more days than 29....



nope, not that i recall, him and sjnap switched leads several times, he may be over 29 currrently, anyone know when sjnap most recently lost his spot?


#-o
Brigadier sjnap
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:30 pm

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby Scott-Land on Sat May 30, 2009 9:13 pm

sjnap wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
sjnap wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
Scott-Land wrote:Maybe categorize the speed players too Blitzy.... I played 8s to get there and team to milk it. Snapo gained most of his points in casual freestyle team. I suppose he did play quite a few speeds when wen were battling it out but it was prolly 99% team games.




done


you notice anything else or other suggestions, let me know, thx



Hmmm..normally i dont care about statistics..but this time i need to clarify something once again.
When i made it to Conqueror first time I did it by seq games. Most of these sequantial games were 6 and 8 sequantial escalating games. So not by freestyle teamgames.
Later on to reach my topscore i did it by mostly freestyle teamgames idd.
But i thought this thread was about getting conqueror ?!




ok sjnap, I will change it


thank u my friend O:)
oh btw...I still luv ya :mrgreen:


Sorry Snapo-- I was referring to when I was Conqueror. At that time, you were all casual free and speed teams.
User avatar
Major Scott-Land
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Sat May 30, 2009 9:15 pm

sjnap wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
sjnap wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
Scott-Land wrote:Maybe categorize the speed players too Blitzy.... I played 8s to get there and team to milk it. Snapo gained most of his points in casual freestyle team. I suppose he did play quite a few speeds when wen were battling it out but it was prolly 99% team games.




done


you notice anything else or other suggestions, let me know, thx



Hmmm..normally i dont care about statistics..but this time i need to clarify something once again.
When i made it to Conqueror first time I did it by seq games. Most of these sequantial games were 6 and 8 sequantial escalating games. So not by freestyle teamgames.
Later on to reach my topscore i did it by mostly freestyle teamgames idd.
But i thought this thread was about getting conqueror ?!




ok sjnap, I will change it


thank u my friend O:)
oh btw...I still luv ya :mrgreen:




you make me blush :oops:
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 15 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Sat May 30, 2009 9:16 pm

karelpietertje wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:anyways, 9 months later and still no changes

That's not what she said :lol:



:lol: good one karelpietertje =D>
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:23 am

Bruceswar wrote:
Crazy Mexican wrote:Is there any way to see the conquerors on a calendar, as in see the length of their reign’s?

or is there any way to get this info?
spankyou



Ask Blitz. He keeps track of things like that




here you go crazy mexican
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby Bruceswar on Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:11 pm

Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby White Moose on Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:14 pm

Bruceswar wrote:Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...


indeed, way more
Image
Highest Score: 3374
User avatar
Major White Moose
 
Posts: 2015
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:33 am
Location: Sweden

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby demonfork on Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:28 pm

White Moose wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...


indeed, way more


at least 90 to 100 days...

he was conqueror for at least 2 weeks before SJ's meltdown after this game

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4623974

which ended april 6th


That would put KH at around 117 days


(when i say meltdown, I mean when his score started to plummet due to all the 1v1's and ass doodles he started playing)
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant demonfork
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:52 pm
Location: Your moms house

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:02 am

demonfork wrote:
White Moose wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...


indeed, way more


at least 90 to 100 days...

he was conqueror for at least 2 weeks before SJ's meltdown after this game

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4623974

which ended april 6th


That would put KH at around 117 days


(when i say meltdown, I mean when his score started to plummet due to all the 1v1's and ass doodles he started playing)




I just forgot to update it, it was around early to mid april and I have around 100 games, think 101
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 16 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:42 am

Blitzaholic wrote:
demonfork wrote:
White Moose wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:Herpes has been there for months now.. more than 29 days I am sure...


indeed, way more


at least 90 to 100 days...

he was conqueror for at least 2 weeks before SJ's meltdown after this game

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4623974

which ended april 6th


That would put KH at around 117 days


(when i say meltdown, I mean when his score started to plummet due to all the 1v1's and ass doodles he started playing)




I just forgot to update it, it was around early to mid april and I have around 100 games, think 101 now on July 20th



kh lost it on 8-14-09, so 101 + july 21 to 31st is 10 days, then august 1 to aug 13 is another 12 days , that's 22, so 101 + 22 = 123
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:50 am

1 karelpietertje 5963 5212 3259 (63%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.7 Netherlands Netherlands


# 17
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby ManBungalow on Sun Aug 16, 2009 7:58 am

Hah - none of these guys are ever going to beat Blitz' record of 170 days any time soon!

Nice list anyway :)

Blitzaholic wrote:for manbugalow to view as he was interested

Thank you very much O:)
Image
Colonel ManBungalow
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:02 am
Location: On a giant rock orbiting a star somewhere

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby Blitzaholic on Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:27 am

ManBungalow wrote:Hah - none of these guys are ever going to beat Blitz' record of 170 days any time soon!

Nice list anyway :)

Blitzaholic wrote:for manbugalow to view as he was interested



Thank you very much O:)



you are welcome manbungalow and someone will pass it one day, all records are made to be broken, I just wanted them to be very challenging to break.
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby prismsaber on Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:06 am

So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.
Colonel prismsaber
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby sjnap on Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:40 pm

prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.



Sorry..i have to make a correction to your statement...when i got the first time conqueror i didnt get there by feestyle ;)
I played at that time 90 % of single escalating games with topplayers like comic boy, scotty, blitzy, poo etc etc.
to raise up my topscore and to maintain in the top i idd used freestyle..because its almost not done to do it with sequantial game!
Brigadier sjnap
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:30 pm

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby Gilligan on Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:46 pm

Hey Blitz....just letting you know, in case you forgot elementary school English, that an apostrophe means possession so there is no apostrophe in 'conquerors'......
Image
User avatar
Captain Gilligan
 
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Providence, RI

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby a.sub on Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:09 pm

Gilligan wrote:Hey Blitz....just letting you know, in case you forgot elementary school English, that an apostrophe means possession so there is no apostrophe in 'conquerors'......

no no no
its all im the implied word "Thread"
CC's 17 CONQUEROR's Thread
User avatar
Cadet a.sub
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:07 am

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby karelpietertje on Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:47 am

prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.

Fact is that, even though the strategy in sequential teamgames or escalating games for instance is way more interesting than in freestyle 1v1, it is not possible to achieve a winning percentage of 99% in sequential, whereas this is very possible in freestyle 1v1.

I think the only thing that could possible be done about this is by separating the scoreboard into a freestyle and a sequential one, where every player has 2 separate scores.

however I don't see this happening any time soon, so I share your concerns.
Image
User avatar
Major karelpietertje
 
Posts: 801
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:43 pm

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby King_Herpes on Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:21 am

prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.


Shit in one hand and place hope in the other, then get back to us on which filled quicker.
Sorry about your little butt ✪ Dumb fucking e-lambs the lot of you
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant King_Herpes
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: Looking for a dime, with a thick behind
2

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby laughingcavalier on Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:21 am

Time for congrats to karelpietertje again, back to Conqueror on a tied score of 5682. Is this the first dead-on tie at the top and what's the tie-breaker?
Reading the above posts, I guess lack must choose generosity of spirit above scatological humour.
Major laughingcavalier
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby prismsaber on Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:11 am

King_Herpes wrote:
prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.


Shit in one hand and place hope in the other, then get back to us on which filled quicker.


Back again with the wit. There's no harm in imagining an age when the strongest tactics are where they should be- the very top of the scoreboard. You may have some people fooled (though I imagine it's simply because you are a "likable" fellow and people like to boost up their friends) but tactically you've never been a top player and never will be. I can stomach someone like sjnap maintaining conqueror through freestyle because he's actually a top 5 or 10 player unlike yourself. Well, anyway, you are right that it is probably a false hope but one can dream. Later.
Colonel prismsaber
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: CC's 17 CONQUEROR's

Postby Mr Changsha on Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:06 am

prismsaber wrote:
King_Herpes wrote:
prismsaber wrote:So the past 5 conquerors have gotten there via freestyle, which includes about 300 days. Who will be the next conqueror to get there via sequential again and when will it happen? Until some serious tinkering with freestyle occurs it won't happen, and even then my guess is it will be a long time from now.


Shit in one hand and place hope in the other, then get back to us on which filled quicker.


Back again with the wit. There's no harm in imagining an age when the strongest tactics are where they should be- the very top of the scoreboard. You may have some people fooled (though I imagine it's simply because you are a "likable" fellow and people like to boost up their friends) but tactically you've never been a top player and never will be. I can stomach someone like sjnap maintaining conqueror through freestyle because he's actually a top 5 or 10 player unlike yourself. Well, anyway, you are right that it is probably a false hope but one can dream. Later.


Hmm...well might we see the freestyle 1on1 merchants dropping back now with the elimination of the double turn rule?

Has the age of the seq. trips quads merchants returned?

Interesting times ahead I suspect.

(btw I am genuinely unclear about to what extent freestyle players - especially 1on1, 2on2 - relied on the double turn for those insane win rates)
Image
User avatar
Colonel Mr Changsha
 
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:42 am

PreviousNext

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users