The next big update... [Feedback Desired]

[RjBeals]

allow us to make bigger maps (dimensions).

[captainwalrus]

allow us to make bigger maps (dimensions).

I agree!

[ender516]

Attack details. For some reason, I've always found those really interesting to look over on similar sites.

What exactly do these details show?

It shows you where they attack and what their dice were. This can be useful in situations such as this:

4 player standard:
-Red has three borders of Green, Blue, and Yellow.
-Players come back and see that he has 4 where he had a 3 previously, so they know he dropped and took a swing and went 0/2, but don't know who he attacked.

Attack details would show which territory he tried to attack.

Also, this additional information should make it possible to create add-ons or plug-ins to do a lot of post-game analysis , or even animated replays .

[MeanestBossEver]

Not on the list but I would prefer to see:

-> Adjustments to 1v1 rules to minimize/eliminate the first mover advantage.
-> Zombie Neutrals (or whatever we're calling them)

[wcaclimbing]

allow us to make bigger maps (dimensions).

I agree!

I agree also!

[the.killing.44]

More XML features please. But 1v1 team games too

.44

[Kotaro]

Designated account sitters - make this bullshit "hacking" C&A threads disappear.

[n00blet]

I voted attack details, because having a "replay" feature would be extraordinarily awesome.

Also, Adjacent Attacks? (And apparent astonishing alliteration)

[angola]

Attack details. For some reason, I've always found those really interesting to look over on similar sites.

What exactly do these details show?

It shows you where they attack and what their dice were. This can be useful in situations such as this:

4 player standard:
-Red has three borders of Green, Blue, and Yellow.
-Players come back and see that he has 4 where he had a 3 previously, so they know he dropped and took a swing and went 0/2, but don't know who he attacked.

Attack details would show which territory he tried to attack.

Hmm, that sounds very interesting. I'm glad I voted for it.

I assume in fog of war it would still show how many armies they lost, just not where they attacked?

[angola]

Not on the list but I would prefer to see:

-> Adjustments to 1v1 rules to minimize/eliminate the first mover advantage.
-> Zombie Neutrals (or whatever we're calling them)

Another question, what are "zombie neutrals"?

[azezzo]

Don't discount my suggestion because of it's brevity in account. (It's merely an augmented argument.) But I, as I know countless other speed players, would like to see implemented the 2-minute speed round.

Wolffystyle~

Please, please, please give us 2 minute rounds as an option for speed games

[AceArtemis]

I'd like to see something to reduce the first-turn advantage in a 1v1 sequential, such as letting the first player only deploy and fort, but not attack on the first turn.

[Kotaro]

I'd like to see a thread actually stay on topic and within the guidelines given.

But hell, that's just me.

[Namor]

I'd like to see a thread actually stay on topic and within the guidelines given.

But hell, that's just me.

You're NOT alone, I agree entirely.

Trouble is, by doing so, we've knocked the thread even further off course

[jako]

i would like to see the freestyle fix, initial army placement and designated account sitters in the next update.