Conquer Club

Can we stop voting before a VC?

Damn it...

Rodion wrote:Can we stop voting before a VC?

Damn it...

I think that was lynch.

strike wolf wrote:

Rodion wrote:Can we stop voting before a VC?

Damn it...

I think that was lynch.

Wow I really miscounted. ignore me!

strike wolf wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

Rodion wrote:Can we stop voting before a VC?

Damn it...

I think that was lynch.

Wow I really miscounted. ignore me!

Already have been...

Vote Count

vodean (7) ~ NoS, aage, jonty, /, SamG, PCM, JG
SamG (1) ~ Rishaed

12 to lynch. Vote count was a bit rushed, and this is in between rounds or partying. Regardless, vodean is a ways from a lynch.

k unvote

I'd like the wagon to have 2-3 people. This way, it's easier to clear/bust players. Ideally, 2 (3 only if you're scared of a doublevoter/vote stealer making a last minute tie to keep Vodean alive). Can we make that happen?

Rodion wrote:I'd like the wagon to have 2-3 people. This way, it's easier to clear/bust players. Ideally, 2 (3 only if you're scared of a doublevoter/vote stealer making a last minute tie to keep Vodean alive). Can we make that happen?

I was on the list of 9 and am willing to keep my vote on vodean for clearing purposes.

Rodion wrote:I'd like the wagon to have 2-3 people. This way, it's easier to clear/bust players. Ideally, 2 (3 only if you're scared of a doublevoter/vote stealer making a last minute tie to keep Vodean alive). Can we make that happen?

Yes could make it happen,suggestions on who stays?

I like Jonty/Aage with no strong preference regarding a possible 3rd.

Rodion wrote:I like Jonty/Aage with no strong preference regarding a possible 3rd.

I'd suggest adding sam at least for some 100% clearance.

aage wrote:

Rodion wrote:I like Jonty/Aage with no strong preference regarding a possible 3rd.

I'd suggest adding sam at least for some 100% clearance.

Good call on that,if not sam I will go just so everyone knows for 100%

im sure im not the only 3rd party saint. if the others dont want to be lynched for the same reason, they may wish to speak up now. I was under the impression that a MAJORITY of humans were third party. whatever though. at this point you are sold on my lynch, and with such a vague and poorly constructed case, there is no defense i can offer. i cant defend myself against this.
you should all be ashamed of yourselves for the blatant bandwagon. tomorrow, im sure half of you will be revealed as scum if chap ever shows up.

what i think is shocking is that i presented a real case on NoS. It was gaining traction, and them someone said "wait, he's not town" and then everyone started BWing me. whatever. you cant be reasoned with.

Unvote

Well, if anyone wants to claim a third party saint, now is probably a fair time to do so...

Unvote


redone for the bold

Unvote for wagon analytics.

vodean wrote:im sure im not the only 3rd party saint. if the others dont want to be lynched for the same reason, they may wish to speak up now. I was under the impression that a MAJORITY of humans were third party. whatever though. at this point you are sold on my lynch, and with such a vague and poorly constructed case, there is no defense i can offer. i cant defend myself against this.
you should all be ashamed of yourselves for the blatant bandwagon. tomorrow, im sure half of you will be revealed as scum if chap ever shows up.

what i think is shocking is that i presented a real case on NoS. It was gaining traction, and them someone said "wait, he's not town" and then everyone started BWing me. whatever. you cant be reasoned with.

Meh, the me case was good but it was me fuckin around.. I figured we had moved past it but ok, hit me with more questions, lol. I got nothing to hide. I wont unvote till we find a person I believe to be 100% scum (who I thought was JG but oh well).

So Vodean, you're defense is that there likely other 3rd party saints? Because two saints have died thus far and both of them turned up with blue names indicating they are town.

We have yet to see any third party saints so lynching you would be a good test that they exist. At worst, we lose someone who's neutral to town's cause, while in the best case it turns out you were lying and are anti-town (which is reasonably likely since you were among those who voted greg and were investigated by chap). I'm leaving my vote where it is unless we find a better case that someone else is scum.

We may all "morally" vote Vodean if no other 3rd-party saint claims, but it would be prudent to have a relatively small wagon (2-3) in order to draw more accurate conclusions from Chap's powers.

Rodion wrote:We may all "morally" vote Vodean if no other 3rd-party saint claims, but it would be prudent to have a relatively small wagon (2-3) in order to draw more accurate conclusions from Chap's powers.

Again need to know who stays for sure. once the final 3 agree,everyone else needs to unvote

jgordon1111 wrote:

Rodion wrote:We may all "morally" vote Vodean if no other 3rd-party saint claims, but it would be prudent to have a relatively small wagon (2-3) in order to draw more accurate conclusions from Chap's powers.

Again need to know who stays for sure. once the final 3 agree,everyone else needs to unvote

Jonty and I already agreed, we only need word from Sam who would be the "any other third person". No need to wait. If anyone last-minute flips their vote we'll lynch that person as well, right?

aage wrote:If anyone last-minute flips their vote we'll lynch that person as well, right?

Yeah, lets treat it like a speedhammer.

aage wrote:

jgordon1111 wrote:

Rodion wrote:We may all "morally" vote Vodean if no other 3rd-party saint claims, but it would be prudent to have a relatively small wagon (2-3) in order to draw more accurate conclusions from Chap's powers.

Again need to know who stays for sure. once the final 3 agree,everyone else needs to unvote

Jonty and I already agreed, we only need word from Sam who would be the "any other third person". No need to wait. If anyone last-minute flips their vote we'll lynch that person as well, right?

True but sam hasnt come in to agree for some reason,or I have missed it. What is going on is trying to make a short list for Chap to work with,so he can 100% clear players. We are getting close to deadline so sam needs to come in and agree,I will hold my vote where it is until he does.

F1fth wrote:So Vodean, you're defense is that there likely other 3rd party saints? Because two saints have died thus far and both of them turned up with blue names indicating they are town.

We have yet to see any third party saints so lynching you would be a good test that they exist. At worst, we lose someone who's neutral to town's cause, while in the best case it turns out you were lying and are anti-town (which is reasonably likely since you were among those who voted greg and were investigated by chap). I'm leaving my vote where it is unless we find a better case that someone else is scum.

so F1Fth, your case is that there is no proof of my role, and there is a chance that i might be scum as a result? yes, i was on chap's list, but so were 10 others... does not really mean very good odds.


to the rest of you, you seem set. thats fine. im sorry i didnt convince you otherwise, but it should give very good info. good luck.

Wouldn't say odds had much to do with it. You've been scummy all game. I think we've been over how contradictory the idea of a 3rd-party saint is anyway, especially one with "cross" in his name.