Nebuchadnezer wrote:4. Iron Butterfly, MoB Deadly, name, safariguy5, drunkmonkey, and Some7thingCLEVER have responded:
a) Some7hing CLEVER's response had nothing to do with my post and was rather off topic.
b)drunkenmonkey had two rather useless one line posts.
c)Djfireside has no response posts.
d)Newguy1 has no response posts.
Those are the facts. I'd like to hear from drunkenmonkey, djfireside and newguy1, before I start voting.
Not sure what you want out of me. No offense, but I think a strict "follow the cop" policy from D1 is an awful idea and the suggestion didn't warrant a direct response. I'd just be echoing what safari & others were saying.
I'm not offended. I just thought I had something better than, "Let's vote somebody to L-2 so that they have to claim."
That track of thinking doesn't get us anywhere, because of course the mafia will claim townie. Where does that leave us? I've never quite followed the "claiming" idea, unless you think the person will claim a power role. In a 9 player game, forcing a claim on a power roll is practically giving the game away.
I also wanted to keep the dialogue going. How were we supposed to know what you thought without you ever having posted? Your one-liners offer nothing...except suspicion...
new guy1 wrote:
well, i liked the idea of having the cop and doc work together durring night time, but that wasnt anything new to add and so it would have been reposting what others said. i am not much of a day one person, and so you will find me rather innactive the first "day". sorry
Another player choosing to not post because they wouldn't "add anything." Seriously? So you'd rather lurk in the shadows, look inactive, and contribute nothing until a direct post is aimed at you? Interesting...