Moderator: Community Team
new guy1 wrote:I dont see why doomyoshi would investigate me night one. My claim made sense (as a blue's brother) and so I dont see a reason why he would need to investigate that. Doomyoshi, would you elaborate on why you chose all of us to investigate?
DoomYoshi wrote:new guy1 wrote:I dont see why doomyoshi would investigate me night one. My claim made sense (as a blue's brother) and so I dont see a reason why he would need to investigate that. Doomyoshi, would you elaborate on why you chose all of us to investigate?
I just investigated who I thought was the scummiest every night. A mafia fakeclaiming mason was possible, and I also wanted to make sure my abilities worked.
Night 2 I was sure ghostly was scum. Especially since safariguy said: for me to be lying about being a roleblocker me and ghost would both have to be lying.
Night 3 chap was under my radar, sort of as a leftover from night 2. Not much happened, so I didn't have much new information to check out.
jonty125 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:new guy1 wrote:I dont see why doomyoshi would investigate me night one. My claim made sense (as a blue's brother) and so I dont see a reason why he would need to investigate that. Doomyoshi, would you elaborate on why you chose all of us to investigate?
I just investigated who I thought was the scummiest every night. A mafia fakeclaiming mason was possible, and I also wanted to make sure my abilities worked.
Night 2 I was sure ghostly was scum. Especially since safariguy said: for me to be lying about being a roleblocker me and ghost would both have to be lying.
Night 3 chap was under my radar, sort of as a leftover from night 2. Not much happened, so I didn't have much new information to check out.
I thought a flavour cop got results based on the name i.e. images or something
MoB Deadly wrote:Im sorry Tails, and all the players in this game. I am going to have to drop out of this
As some of you know, my activity has dropped since January, and has dwindled since. I was hoping I would magically become unbusy and I could play again. However, I have not had that luxury.
As a mod, if I saw players with an activity level of mine, I would be infuriated. So I will respectfully withdraw from this game, so that you guys will have a more active and contributing player.
Thanks, and I apologize. I'll hopefully be back soon, as I really enjoy mafia
I am going to have to ask you the same question I asked Jak. Can you tell me how you character is depicted in your role pm? Explain to me why he would be in this game.jonty125 wrote:I am Erik Turner from the band Warrant and I'm a VT.Vote Doomyoshi A fourth investigative role in 17 is a bit extreme as well in Greek mafia I used flavour cop as a fakeclaim.
Well, no surprises here. DoomYoshi is smart and knows his way around mafia, so of course when fake-claiming actions he will claim things that you have made sense for him to have done if he actually has whatever powers he is fake-claiming. Accordingly, this explanation, while necessary, isn't too helpful in deciding if we should buy this claim or not.DoomYoshi wrote:I just investigated who I thought was the scummiest every night. A mafia fakeclaiming mason was possible, and I also wanted to make sure my abilities worked.
Night 2 I was sure ghostly was scum. Especially since safariguy said: for me to be lying about being a roleblocker me and ghost would both have to be lying.
Night 3 chap was under my radar, sort of as a leftover from night 2. Not much happened, so I didn't have much new information to check out.
spiesr wrote:Initial thoughts on Doom's claim:
*Yet another investigative role? We already had a Tracker and a Watcher. And I am a regular cop, so unless my sanity is random results (making me useless) then I think we may have too many here. At the very least it makes me wonder why the town would need this many. Are the scum that strong? If so there might be more than 1 left?
*Seems almost too convenient that two of your targets died the night you investigated them (thus rendering your action useless) and the other was the first person to claim in the game. Your results appear to give us no information whatsoever. Admittedly I am not really one to talk as two of my targets are dead and the other result has it's usefulness gutted by the possibility of a Godfather. At least I have it going for me that if you go back and read the subject line of my posts on pages 55 and 58 you can see where I claimed my results. (Before the death of Chapcrap and Strikewolf.) Since you asked me, I will return the favor and ask for some explanation of why you choose the targets you did.
*A chef for a flavor cop? How punerific. Based on what we can gather from the dead scum, it appears that the scum were not given fake-claims but had to come up with their own. Safariguy used his actually character and simply changed the alignment and SomethingClever made a poorly thought out decision on his character. Does yours hold up? I don't know right now, kind of tired so I will sleep on it and hopefully have better insight tomorrow.
everywhere116 wrote:spiesr wrote:Initial thoughts on Doom's claim:
*Yet another investigative role? We already had a Tracker and a Watcher. And I am a regular cop, so unless my sanity is random results (making me useless) then I think we may have too many here. At the very least it makes me wonder why the town would need this many. Are the scum that strong? If so there might be more than 1 left?
*Seems almost too convenient that two of your targets died the night you investigated them (thus rendering your action useless) and the other was the first person to claim in the game. Your results appear to give us no information whatsoever. Admittedly I am not really one to talk as two of my targets are dead and the other result has it's usefulness gutted by the possibility of a Godfather. At least I have it going for me that if you go back and read the subject line of my posts on pages 55 and 58 you can see where I claimed my results. (Before the death of Chapcrap and Strikewolf.) Since you asked me, I will return the favor and ask for some explanation of why you choose the targets you did.
*A chef for a flavor cop? How punerific. Based on what we can gather from the dead scum, it appears that the scum were not given fake-claims but had to come up with their own. Safariguy used his actually character and simply changed the alignment and SomethingClever made a poorly thought out decision on his character. Does yours hold up? I don't know right now, kind of tired so I will sleep on it and hopefully have better insight tomorrow.
Holy f*ck. How did we all miss them?
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:MoB Deadly:
dazza2008:
spiesr:
everywhere116:
jonty125: 2 (spiesr, everywhere)
Victor Sullivan:
new guy1:
soundman:
Doom Yoshi: 2 (Dazza, Jonty)
jak111: 1 (Doom)
NL:
With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch.
soundman wrote:Well I have nothing better to go on. And since he is a VT (the last mafia probably claimed VT) then I don't have a problem lynching him.
I think that somewhere in this list is the last (or if there are two, then the last two) mafia. Not in any particular order:
Dazza
Jonty
Victor
Doom
Jak
Vote Jonty
dazza2008 wrote:soundman wrote:Well I have nothing better to go on. And since he is a VT (the last mafia probably claimed VT) then I don't have a problem lynching him.
I think that somewhere in this list is the last (or if there are two, then the last two) mafia. Not in any particular order:
Dazza
Jonty
Victor
Doom
Jak
Vote Jonty
I think I believe the VT claims.
I don't think there would be that many investigative roles in a game this size so I will leave my vote on Doom.
everywhere116 wrote:I'll go with jonty. I have reservations about jak and his hair-trigger claiming, but I like your case on jonty.
Unvote vote jonty
Doesn't it seem a little odd that you would list Jak having claimed vanilla townie as an important part of your decision to vote Jak when you are a vanilla townie yourself?jonty125 wrote:vote jak
Reasons:
1. Claiming VT
2. Failing to spell his role
3. Clearing yourself based on doc save
4. For saying there is only 1 3rd party
5. Then saying there is a 1/10 chance of him being mafia as if that doesn't apply to the rest of us
Maybe we should with your own idea of lynching everyone who claims vanilla townie?jonty125 wrote:Well if we lynch all vanilla claims it forces mafia to claim something else which therefore can be tested. Also, 5 mafia in a 17 player game. This includes a SK. Does anyone think that could be slightly anti-town balanced. I have no idea if there is another 3rd party but you can't just write it off.
spiesr wrote:One thing I would like to throw out there regarding Jonty.Doesn't it seem a little odd that you would list Jak having claimed vanilla townie as an important part of your decision to vote Jak when you are a vanilla townie yourself?jonty125 wrote:vote jak
Reasons:
1. Claiming VT
2. Failing to spell his role
3. Clearing yourself based on doc save
4. For saying there is only 1 3rd party
5. Then saying there is a 1/10 chance of him being mafia as if that doesn't apply to the rest of usMaybe we should with your own idea of lynching everyone who claims vanilla townie?jonty125 wrote:Well if we lynch all vanilla claims it forces mafia to claim something else which therefore can be tested. Also, 5 mafia in a 17 player game. This includes a SK. Does anyone think that could be slightly anti-town balanced. I have no idea if there is another 3rd party but you can't just write it off.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users