freezie wrote:pmchugh wrote:freezie wrote:pmchugh wrote:Lets be honest, anyone casting suspicion on me is doing so purely because they don't like what I am saying.. not because they actually think I am mafia.
I'll challenge you to back these words:
Let's be honest, you're not helping the town by telling everyone who doesn't want to hear about it that you don't like what Zimmah has been saying. He has used poor logic, yes, but everyone has agreed that he doesn't appear scummy. You're trying to make a case that nobody wants to lynch for, and keep on doing it because Zimmah '' hasn't answered your question'' when in fact, from my view, he has. More than once.
You know I can't back that up with solid evidence but it is still pretty clear there was a growing aggression against me and others still on the zimmah case. I could have reasonably bet that I would be voted sooner or later by those criticizing the case.
Now please quote where Zimmah states his opinion on whether you are mafia or not, on whether he believes it was a joke. Quote it from "several" different posts please.
Ask and you'Ll receive. With added bonus to your case, outside of the question/answer useless thing:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:i never said i believed the joke
I may have misread this, please clarify. Did you mean, "I never believed he was joking" or "I never believed what he was saying was genuinely true"?
I beleive this is your question, and to be honest, the answer is what you quoted. He never beleived the joke. Fuirther Proofs:zimmah wrote:note how i said that knew it was SUPPOSED TO BE (=LOOK LIKE) A joke, but I DO NOT BELIEVE it was ACTUALLY a joke. i never said that i didn't read it well enough and i never appaired to skim. if you truly believe i skimmed, you're the one skimming, as if you'd take the time to actually read what i said, it'd be obvious that i did my research. just because we don't agree doesn't mean i didn't read everything.zimmah wrote:edocsil wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ok this whole thing is just so annoying to read! it was a joke cant we all just get the joke and move on with the dang game??!?
You got something better to talk about? Zimmah overreacting implies skimming, skimming implies scum. Ergo Zimmah implies scum.
you're the one skimming, i was aware it's supposedto be a joke, but i'm not buying it.
As far as wether he thinks I am mafia or not, he clearly said I'd use that miller claim as a cover...So he did imply he thought I was scum. Albeit fort illogical reasons. So, for one last time, stop beating the dead horse ( To re-use you Americans' words )
Oh yea, the added bonus to your case:pmchugh wrote:zimmah wrote:so just because you say i should retract my vote i should? no way, i retract my vote whenever i feel the need, and that is not now.
f*ck the vote, it doesn't matter. The point is you still insist he wasn't joking.
That's your words, right? You say, and understand, that Zimmah insist on saying I wasn't joking. Meaning, he didn't beleive the joke. YOU answered the question you asked to him, before you questionned it.
There is a difference in time lines. Zimmah created a case and voted you, does that mean he still suspects you now? No not at all, especially in the light of him posting things like:
zimmah wrote:it's day 1 get real, how much chance we actually have to really find scum in the first place?
In fact I think he has finally answered the question on whether you are mafia as, "I don't know" rather than yes as you seem to suggest is obvious. What he had previously is different to what he thinks now and that is exactly what I wanted to establish. (correct me if i'm wrong zimmah)
He created a case, someone called him bull headed and I wanted to know if after all that time he was indeed holding on to the same opinions. I see nothing wrong with this.