pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.
Moderators: Global Moderators, Discussions Team
pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
jonty125 wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.

Iron Butterfly wrote:And Jak..by you playing Hall monitor you now make it difficult for people to speak their thoughts and change their minds.
If I decided I wanted to change my vote to Everywhere it would now appear I was bandwagoning and trying to "appear" town by hopping to the popular case.
aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
vodean wrote:jonty125 wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.
jonty, it is this particular form of BW that catches people's eyes. for someone who is on a number of scumdars, atm, you should justify your every vote.
I move that we pressure jonty next, (tomorrow, if we lynch everywhere, or S7C, perhaps?)
That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
everywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
However, you are correct. But I am not a hider. I'm a priest.
thechuck51 wrote:everywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
However, you are correct. But I am not a hider. I'm a priest.
That should be easy enough to prove. If somebody could put you at L-1, you could vote yourself. you can then cast a vote for yourself. If you are a priest nothing should happen, if you are lying you are lynched.
everywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim..aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest