Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
[/quote]rishaed wrote:Ok before I vote, I have to check with /'s list to see if CM5 was on A list, Here is a quote from Jak. The problem is that this isn't the original post.
THIS is the original post
[quote=jgordon]Sorry forgot to answer one Thing, as town I am everytime willing to take one scum with me as long as my role is not crucial. But you already know that Jak. Vote stealing scum VS compeller town, even trade,plus town has one less scum,and considering you are good at this game,even better for town.
That is why I am willing if it comes to it to trade even up for your head. Plus town has a good idea of who to take N3 when you flip Red.
Yes use the idea that / came up with and I will gladly cast the only vote it will clearly mark my alignment, I have never disagreed with it just thought shorter list are better.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
rishaed wrote:Sry for the triple post, but I just noticed on the Changing words around part afterwards. . . I was too busy following the "hey I've read something just about the same somewhere else but it's means something completely different" train of thought and missed the "I switched some words around." afterward.
jak111 wrote:rishaed wrote:Sry for the triple post, but I just noticed on the Changing words around part afterwards. . . I was too busy following the "hey I've read something just about the same somewhere else but it's means something completely different" train of thought and missed the "I switched some words around." afterward.
Rishaed, I made it red so it was OBVIOUS I switched the quote around. But I fixed his quote to suit what he's REALLY thinking when he posted instead of what he said in it. More of a mock to him to tell him I know he's cornered. Either town hangs me today and gets him tomorrow or if I can get town to trust me for once avoid letting them lynch a townie and go straight for him.
Strike is right that I get homed in on people, but when they accuse you of something that you know to be wrong, that's when I really home in on them. But the funny thing is, is I was being somewhat rational before everything got out of hand and he "confirmed he checked with Edoc". The only possible way we're both town is if there was a busdriver, framer, or other. Which I doubt highly with how much people are homing in back on me.
Then I present a good case to at least if I die, Chap's scum list gets narrowed. Vodean claimed non town, so his vote would just be there, JG would be proved non town with my death. But the other two would be either cleared or found guilty (if found guilty then of course we'd have the REST of the list completely cleared ) But again, something that people should've headed a listen to has fallen on deaf ears of the JG and Aage screamo band coming out called Guilty Their first album is also called Guilty In fact, all the songs on that album are called Guilty Which shall be proven and I expect a hug after the game when I am right
vodean wrote:it would be great to hear from vio on all this... she usually never posts more than once a week, and sometimes it goes as long as 2 weeks. scummarining? i think so.
strike wolf wrote:Honestly, I'd be more inclined to vote jak but this behavior is actually fairly par for the course from jak. Same thing happened in Psychology mafia. if Jak thinks you are scum, he won't shift from that position unless you've been 105% cleared and game facts are either twisted or ignored. if you happen to think that Jak is wrong in his position (particularly to the extent of voting him) well you're probably scum to.
I remain adamant about aage , I am 95% convinced he is scum. Which is more than I can say about the other cases on the board.
rishaed wrote:rishaed wrote:Ok before I vote, I have to check with /'s list to see if CM5 was on A list, Here is a quote from Jak. The problem is that this isn't the original post.
THIS is the original postjgordon wrote:Sorry forgot to answer one Thing, as town I am everytime willing to take one scum with me as long as my role is not crucial. But you already know that Jak. Vote stealing scum VS compeller town, even trade,plus town has one less scum,and considering you are good at this game,even better for town.
That is why I am willing if it comes to it to trade even up for your head. Plus town has a good idea of who to take N3 when you flip Red.
Yes use the idea that / came up with and I will gladly cast the only vote it will clearly mark my alignment, I have never disagreed with it just thought shorter list are better.
THIS is a huge Mistake. I can't believe nobody else picked it up. Or do you believe everything in quote signs.
As is once I'm sure about if i stand on A/B I will vote.
EBWOP.
but that aside.I don't see your point.So you type the name between comma's here wrote:and then there's the quote
strike wolf wrote:I remain adamant about aage , I am 95% convinced he is scum. Which is more than I can say about the other cases on the board.
That name isn't supposed to be among the list. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saraqael http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uriel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabrael http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archangel#Roman_Catholic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch Please look into this as well, I don't have time right now and probably won't any more before the deadline but that is a strange claim. It at least means the flavour must be based on the Book of Enoch which is not regarded canonical by the RCC. Or maybe I'm wrong and I don't have time to figure it out now. Please look into it.jgordon wrote:I AM SABRAEL
jgordon1111 wrote:2 things I didnt think about jak not removing his vote,so in that case make me and vodean do the voting,and chap can do his thing and clear us.
jak111 wrote:jgordon1111 wrote:2 things I didnt think about jak not removing his vote,so in that case make me and vodean do the voting,and chap can do his thing and clear us.
But before I stop fighting (still got today left to prove him scum) 2 things are wrong with this post.
1.) Vodean claimed non human hence he cannot be 'cleared'.
2.) Now this admits that you know I wasn't able to use my vote steal, thus being able to prove you wrong tomorrow if living.
If I was hiding my stolen vote, this situation he wouldn't feel confident about.
If I was a JoaT why not prove him wrong by tomorrow without the town kill?
Still like how no one is thinking about this option we have. "Let's lynch ____ then lynch ____, I don't care, as long as we lynch!" pretty much sums up town's thoughts atm. So basically let's not lynch the one we know to be non town and then prove scum tomorrow, instead, let's lynch town, and leave two non town standing, great ideas, got a better one?
VioIet wrote:vodean wrote:it would be great to hear from vio on all this... she usually never posts more than once a week, and sometimes it goes as long as 2 weeks. scummarining? i think so.
I am not sure where you get these statistics from I have never gone more than two weeks without posting in any recent game. How many games have you even played with me?strike wolf wrote:Honestly, I'd be more inclined to vote jak but this behavior is actually fairly par for the course from jak. Same thing happened in Psychology mafia. if Jak thinks you are scum, he won't shift from that position unless you've been 105% cleared and game facts are either twisted or ignored. if you happen to think that Jak is wrong in his position (particularly to the extent of voting him) well you're probably scum to.
I remain adamant about aage , I am 95% convinced he is scum. Which is more than I can say about the other cases on the board.
I actually really like your case on Aage, however, I don't see it gaining any momentum today. It will be between Jak and Vodean. I agree that Jak is playing as normal, yet Vodean always appears extremely scummy to me. I can't ever give him the benefit of the doubt, and I don't believe his role claim. I also wanted to make another case on Victor tomorrow.
As to Jak and Vodean, I still believe that Vodean is the scummier of the two. However, lynching Jak will bring about more info. I may change my vote right before the deadline, if necessary.
Sabriel: (or Sabrael) - one of the 7 archangels and guard of the 1st Heaven as noted in Conybeare, The Testament of Solomon, and in III Enoch.
Sabrael is also chief of the order of tarshishim ("the brilliant ones"), who are equated with the order of virtues, sharing post with Tarshiel - according to Maseket Azilut. The principal duty of the virtues is to work miracles on earth. They are said to be the chief bestowers of grace and valor.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
VioIet wrote:vodean wrote:it would be great to hear from vio on all this... she usually never posts more than once a week, and sometimes it goes as long as 2 weeks. scummarining? i think so.
I am not sure where you get these statistics from I have never gone more than two weeks without posting in any recent game. How many games have you even played with me?strike wolf wrote:Honestly, I'd be more inclined to vote jak but this behavior is actually fairly par for the course from jak. Same thing happened in Psychology mafia. if Jak thinks you are scum, he won't shift from that position unless you've been 105% cleared and game facts are either twisted or ignored. if you happen to think that Jak is wrong in his position (particularly to the extent of voting him) well you're probably scum to.
I remain adamant about aage , I am 95% convinced he is scum. Which is more than I can say about the other cases on the board.
I actually really like your case on Aage, however, I don't see it gaining any momentum today. It will be between Jak and Vodean. I agree that Jak is playing as normal, yet Vodean always appears extremely scummy to me. I can't ever give him the benefit of the doubt, and I don't believe his role claim. I also wanted to make another case on Victor tomorrow.
As to Jak and Vodean, I still believe that Vodean is the scummier of the two. However, lynching Jak will bring about more info. I may change my vote right before the deadline, if necessary.
jak111 wrote:William of York, I am not a huge religious follower but he is important no? If he is, where's my counter claim? No one? Because I am town JG, face it. Your lies will only last until my lynch and then they shall be proven for what they are. Do not bolster yourself with false confidence when you know it only exists while town do not believe in me.
JG, right now, you're playing the mod, not sure if anyone else has changed their minds but playing the mod is scummy as f*ck. You're saying Edoc would do this or that? Are you Edoc? Do you not think Edoc has a life and was too busy to get back to me in time? Yes, I got the pm's late, I got the gift late AND I got told that I mis voted late, all of which was during a time period that I was in bed asleep or at school. Either way, people are late sending in their actions so it fucks with Edoc's deadline plans and I know Edoc well enough that he keeps a deadline when he sets one like I do in my games (Unless I'm too pissed of not having enough night actions from inactives).
With soo many inactives I doubt anyone will counter JG in time to prove him wrong, and I seriously doubt town will change their minds when I am blatantly right about this. Sometimes they trust me TOO much and other times they don't trust me enough. This is the second of those two.
I'm pissed to be honest, not at you, Aage, or the others that are active, but the number of inactives that could either clear/pin one of us but since they are inactive they can't do anything. That's what I'm pissed about, or perhaps one of them bussed me and another and you really targeted someone else. If a town busdriver did that, and then went inactive and let us scrap at each other like this, his reputation in my mind would be very low.
So JG, this paragraph wont be a mind changer or a plea, but I want you to know since obviously you know what REAL alignment you are, that if you are mafia, you're a deadman tonight/tomorrow. But if you're town, inactives might be screwing us over completely because I can promise you I will flip blue upon death.
jak111 wrote:Again, false accusations will get you no where.
Who would counter claim me? Are you seriously intentionally skimming now? You know I said William of York is most likely important, hence it'd be a name that would be counter claimed if I was lying.
My pm lines up with Vio's enough that I can pretty much confirm her as saint, especially given the shit you're trying to pull. The fact that you want pressure on her shows me that she is town. Scum when caught wouldn't intentionally put FOS's on their scum mates for investigation roles to check out, no, Vio is pretty much as clear to me as anyone on that list will ever be (Well DRoZ ties her with an actual full claim XD) There is me, DRoZ and Vio on that list that I know to be town. Everyone knows Vodean to be non town, I know you to be non town, and I am pretty damn sure out of Strike and Aage that Aage is non town, leaving only (from my pov)
~Saf
~Jonty (I feel is town due to fight between him and Vodean toward beginning of day)
~Soundman
~Nag
~Strike (but clear if Aage flips scum)
Out of the 3 remaining in reality, I feel Saf is the last of the non town because of a certain meta I'm using on him. However that's not even above 50% sure (which is why I wanted him on the list of 4 so he could be either caught or cleared, leaving only two real suspects left)
However, no one seems to like my plan of clearing and catching scum, because they do not believe me. Why? Because they got it in their minds that I MUST be scum because a real scum is deciding to claim angel, so let's kill the saint that is actually known in history (I've heard of his name, and that means quite a bit when I'm not even religious) so I want ONE person to tell me they never heard of William of York. ONE. None of you can say that because somewhere down the line you've heard of him, whether you know more about him than I or just know OF him like I do, you know him.
I find it funny how people are skimming over my posts so I will make the next part stand out quite clearly.
~ JG and people voting me are under the assumption that I am a mafia JoaT, and that is why I do not have my stolen vote.
~ In fact I am just a vote stealer who messed up sending in a name because I had the WRONG tab open (the official game which Ghostly is in) and sent in his name.
~ JG claims to have FORCED me to use my role.
~ Given one day I can prove that he didn't force me because I will have the vote tomorrow hence, proving his role WRONG
~ I will not be given that day because the JG posse would rather lynch a town and then a scum instead of a third party and then a scum
^ Look at that coloured text, point out ONE thing that is wrong about it. I dare you to try without bullshitting your way through it. That last point is the one that gets me the most. I can prove him wrong tomorrow and we could lynch a third party today, getting rid of two threats to town instead of wasting a day and a townie over some bullshit that can be proven given a SINGLE game day.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users