Moderator: Community Team
/ wrote:Why do you assume it was the secret vote stolen, strike? I don't believe that was ever confirmed.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
chapcrap wrote:I generally agree with strike's latest post.
I think it's kind of ironic how many people bandwagon greg for bandwagoning...
I think that vodean is acting strangely.
I already said that I thought we should go after an inactive or one of the people in the middle of things. To be sure, greg was not one of the people I was thinking. However, as always, I appreciate some good Day 1, er Day 1: The Sequel, pressure. So, I will vote greg for pressure if something hasn't happened the next time I check in.
strike wolf wrote:True enough Pancake. I mentioned that earlier as far as two Vote Stealers. However I won't give it 50/50 odds.
First, we have no confirmation that Illiad's vote really was stolen (and since it was his secret vote we really can't get confirmation). I would tend to believe him but there isn't confirmation.
Second, Jak has come forward and admitted to stealing Victor's however no one has come forward to admit that they stole Iliad's. So when a Vote Stealer willingly comes forward admitting it, I tend to believe them over the clandestine stealer.
It's still more of a 75/25 split.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:On your first point, that's a terribly silly thing to lie about, especially for someone who is presumed to be town. If it were false, what would be gained from us believing a lie?
jak111 wrote:Sam seems dead set on me ;o but I can deal with that. People are NOW bandwagoning Greg, so somehow the word hypocrites comes to mind when they all state the same reasons after another. Just saying.
Interesting Pancake, does it not cross your mind that there may be no other vote stealer? It's a risky move but one he pulled off well if he isn't who he says he is. The gain? Town credit, you know this is true. Scum want town credit to zip on by.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
jak111 wrote:pancakemix wrote:On your first point, that's a terribly silly thing to lie about, especially for someone who is presumed to be town. If it were false, what would be gained from us believing a lie?
Interesting Pancake, does it not cross your mind that there may be no other vote stealer? It's a risky move but one he pulled off well if he isn't who he says he is. The gain? Town credit, you know this is true. Scum want town credit to zip on by.you arent even really making any sense here. you are saying that the other person would want to look town by claiming... so you claimed to get town cred. thats what you're saying, correct? that's what it sounds like.
Although what has me REALLY thinking is this... for those who said earlier there may not be a cult, there HAVE to be third parties out there of some kind. Otherwise you're looking at a balance of 6-8 scum.. which would be terribly overpowered. But the reason why I bring this note up is I want the people who are town to be watching for a group thing going on. In this game I will say MINIMUM of 5 scum. 2-3 of them are bound to be teaming up somewhere to make a townie look scummy.
For today, my final vote is going on a guy I find is just getting by by one liners. Whether he's a VT, third party, or scum, we need active people in the days to come.
Unvote, Vote Vodean (My second vote will be placed here too)
There's a couple of reasons behind this if people care to check.
~Lately posts have been sort of random and non contributing.school, work, sports. im a busy man. i also live several lives outside of CC, as blasphemous as that may sound.
~One liners have been his motto for the past 2 weeks or so. see above. youve said the same thing twice, hoping people will see two separate arguments and hop on your BW.
~His post on me not being an angel so therefore being scum when he voted me when I outed myself seems a bit odd. It means he isn't a human 100% So whether he's an angel, demon, or 3rd party we will get to finally start unraveling some of the mysteries.you said you werent human. i then inferred that since you didnt seem to be an angel, you must be a demon (i think 3rd parties are likely all human). stop twisting our words. you are clearly lying, and trying to redirect and mislead town. the question is what you are leading us away from? scumbuddies?
For town reads, this is what I got.
~Violet
~Sam
~/
So 3 clears in my books.
Gonna go through and check who else is getting by with one-liners. Those are the ones that have a huge chance of being non town or at least non essential to town if we mislynch.
jak111 wrote:pancakemix wrote:On your first point, that's a terribly silly thing to lie about, especially for someone who is presumed to be town. If it were false, what would be gained from us believing a lie?
Interesting Pancake, does it not cross your mind that there may be no other vote stealer? It's a risky move but one he pulled off well if he isn't who he says he is. The gain? Town credit, you know this is true. Scum want town credit to zip on by.
Although what has me REALLY thinking is this... for those who said earlier there may not be a cult, there HAVE to be third parties out there of some kind. Otherwise you're looking at a balance of 6-8 scum.. which would be terribly overpowered. But the reason why I bring this note up is I want the people who are town to be watching for a group thing going on. In this game I will say MINIMUM of 5 scum. 2-3 of them are bound to be teaming up somewhere to make a townie look scummy.
For today, my final vote is going on a guy I find is just getting by by one liners. Whether he's a VT, third party, or scum, we need active people in the days to come.
Unvote, Vote Vodean (My second vote will be placed here too)
There's a couple of reasons behind this if people care to check.
~Lately posts have been sort of random and non contributing.
~One liners have been his motto for the past 2 weeks or so.
~His post on me not being an angel so therefore being scum when he voted me when I outed myself seems a bit odd. It means he isn't a human 100% So whether he's an angel, demon, or 3rd party we will get to finally start unraveling some of the mysteries.
For town reads, this is what I got.
~Violet
~Sam
~/
So 3 clears in my books.
Gonna go through and check who else is getting by with one-liners. Those are the ones that have a huge chance of being non town or at least non essential to town if we mislynch.
jonty125 wrote:jak111 wrote:Sam seems dead set on me ;o but I can deal with that. People are NOW bandwagoning Greg, so somehow the word hypocrites comes to mind when they all state the same reasons after another. Just saying.
This is a 25 player game, people have to BW to get a lynch.
pancakemix wrote:Interesting Pancake, does it not cross your mind that there may be no other vote stealer? It's a risky move but one he pulled off well if he isn't who he says he is. The gain? Town credit, you know this is true. Scum want town credit to zip on by.
There are so many things wrong with this I don't know where to start. We already know he's a double voter. He proved that. That gives him all the town credit he needs. Lying about it is just kinda pouring it on too thickly. That's also a terribly harebrained scheme, the kind that I just attributed to you in my last post (a part of which you did not address). If it's the kind of thing you think someone else would try to do, it's probably something that you would try to do to.
Now, I thought I was pretty clear on all of the above in my last few posts, but either I was wrong or you weren't paying attention. And I know I cover my points well in all my posts.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
jak111 wrote:Read again, they're hypocrites for doing the exact same thing to him as for their reason to vote him. Illogical to believe that has nothing suspicious looming about it.jonty125 wrote:This is a 25 player game, people have to BW to get a lynch.jak111 wrote:Sam seems dead set on me ;o but I can deal with that. People are NOW bandwagoning Greg, so somehow the word hypocrites comes to mind when they all state the same reasons after another. Just saying.
nagerous wrote:It is impossible to get a lynch without ultimately bandwagoning taking place, especially in a 25 player game some peoples' voting posts will be weaker than others. What people didn't like about gregwolf's post was that it was not well thought out and his reasons for voting seemed insincere.
jak111 wrote:I did not claim to receive town cred, I claimed because Illiad claimed to have his vote taken away/stolen, and I didn't do it, so either he was lying or there's another in play here.
I didn't see safari say he thought otherwise, but merely that he thought it was unfounded to claim that third party must exist. You yourself just admitted that there is indeed a chance of it being possible and I would agree with safari that the possibility should not be completely discounted in a game themed on the dichotomy of heaven and hell.jak111 wrote:Safari, do you not agree that in most likely hood there is a third party in play whether it be survivors, cult, 2nd mafia, or sk just due to the shear numbers? If you don't meta a bit then your past experience with anyone or anything is a waste to think upon. The most likely set-ups I see going on without saying who's what are.
[...]
With perhaps a few added roles in any of those setups. The chance of there being ONLY mafia and town are very low and you know that's a long shot to say it's meta to believe so.
jak111 wrote:jonty125 wrote:jak111 wrote:Sam seems dead set on me ;o but I can deal with that. People are NOW bandwagoning Greg, so somehow the word hypocrites comes to mind when they all state the same reasons after another. Just saying.
This is a 25 player game, people have to BW to get a lynch.
Read again, they're hypocrites for doing the exact same thing to him as for their reason to vote him. Illogical to believe that has nothing suspicious looming about it.pancakemix wrote:Interesting Pancake, does it not cross your mind that there may be no other vote stealer? It's a risky move but one he pulled off well if he isn't who he says he is. The gain? Town credit, you know this is true. Scum want town credit to zip on by.
There are so many things wrong with this I don't know where to start. We already know he's a double voter. He proved that. That gives him all the town credit he needs. Lying about it is just kinda pouring it on too thickly. That's also a terribly harebrained scheme, the kind that I just attributed to you in my last post (a part of which you did not address). If it's the kind of thing you think someone else would try to do, it's probably something that you would try to do to.
Now, I thought I was pretty clear on all of the above in my last few posts, but either I was wrong or you weren't paying attention. And I know I cover my points well in all my posts.
Not saying he's NOT a double voter. But I'm saying it IS a possibility that the mod let him get away with a fake claim by "noting" it. Whether that is true or not is not 100% known to us, but the possibility of it is still there. Even if he's telling the truth about his role, as many point out, are two double-ish voters the same faction or opposite factions? If the second, then he'd be around the scum lines, if the first, he may be town.
Reply to Vodean
Check again, the first two statements are different, one is not contributing by posting nonsense in your earlier posts lately, the other is for posting only one liners even when you DO try to add something to the conversation. Both are different because you do not need one for the other.
I did not claim to receive town cred, I claimed because Illiad claimed to have his vote taken away/stolen, and I didn't do it, so either he was lying or there's another in play here.
Glad you're busy, I'm busy as well, does not mean I must post off topic posts like your one talking about something to do with my testicles
Safari, do you not agree that in most likely hood there is a third party in play whether it be survivors, cult, 2nd mafia, or sk just due to the shear numbers? If you don't meta a bit then your past experience with anyone or anything is a waste to think upon. The most likely set-ups I see going on without saying who's what are.
Set-up 1
5-6 Mafia
2 Third Party
Rest town.
Set-up 2
4 mafia
4 second mafia
Rest town.
Set-up 3
5 mafia
Cult
Rest town
With perhaps a few added roles in any of those setups. The chance of there being ONLY mafia and town are very low and you know that's a long shot to say it's meta to believe so.
safariguy5 wrote:I'm not saying that I know whether or not there are third party jak. Although large games tend to favor third party, I think it is premature to think that there must be third party. And even if we DO have third party, it seems that some people are exceedingly paranoid that it HAS to be a cult. I've said before that I don't see how a cult would fit this theme, and I'm skeptical that humans would play a third party role. It's possible we have a few survivors or lyncher or something, but I see no reason to suspect cult or a large third party faction. Not even flavor can justify it at this point.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:Altering the game so a scum could get away with a fake claim would be bastard modding. Edoc is not a bastard mod.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
edocsil wrote:Vote Count
Jak - shaggy, pcm, cm5, vodean, Sam, greg
Vodean - lsu, Jak, ???
Greg - Saf, Fifth, jonty, sound, Vio, aage, jgordon, hensow
Hensow - Droz
samgrossy wrote:While I can't agree totally with Sound's post, I do agree that we need to come to some sort of decision. But I think that we have reached a sort of consensus.
The interesting part is that this game is lynch by plurality not majority. Remember the push in D1 to make the vote count even so that there wouldn't be a lynch? So, right now Greg would be lynched regardless of the number of votes. At the very least there are 8 votes against greg which is close to a majority. It is also why I don't feel like I MUST change my vote from Jak to get a lynch.
We just have to be careful because scum could be lurking and at the last minute even up the vote count to prevent one of their own from getting lynched.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users