So the post below got me thinking about seeing if there is a case against Victor that would hold water. While I know that this isn't the best way to build a case, town has yet to receive a scum lynch, and his posts just keep rubbing me the wrong way.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Fluff my muffins! I can't believe that.
-Sully
We all have witnessed Sully making quick one-line posts that have very little relevance to the game. If you need to jog your memory, check Day 1
here and
here or Day 3
here. These are just like the above post.
But in my research, here's what I found interesting.
Sully votes for Greg D1, check the vote and his modest buddying with Jak, who originally made the vote. You all know how I feel about Jak. Notice that (in his own way) he is saying that this case is worth pursuing. Straws are bendy - Let's see where this case leads.
Victor Sullivan wrote:nagerous wrote:Grasping at straws there Jak,
They're the bendy straws, though; they're worth grasping at.
Unvote vote gregwolf-Sully
Could this be scum buddying?
Then Jak officially votes someone else, Aage. That post is
hereNow he is pushed into talking about some comments he made and Violet and him have some real discussion about it and he posts this little gem:
Victor Sullivan wrote:I'm not really sure what you want? It's not like I can do much Day 1 aside from building pointless cases or taking sides on pointless cases. And I'm sure I'm not the only one posting what one might call "fluff". It's easy to be in the midst of things and seem like you're doing more than you are. I mean, many of you are trying way too hard to find something in that post of mine. I feel like that's evidence enough that we've yet again accomplished very little Day 1.
My whole thing is I'm simply stopping in to say, "hello," and let you all know I'm keeping track of the conversation. There's not much else to do without a little night action-action.
-Sully
What happened to the bendy straws that need pursuing? I thought that we should pressure people a little? Those are your words. Or are you trying to distance yourself from the scum buddying? I think that is the case because if you truly believed that there wasn't a case on anyone, you would have unvoted Greg. But, for some reason, your vote stayed. That's suspicious. ESPECIALLY since your vote never changed D1 even after the push to even out votes and people going for a no lynch.
Now it gets even better:Victor Sullivan wrote:I mean Day 2 there is more out there to verify/disprove claims. And my philosophy for voting inactives was for Day 1 only and only on the basis that I'd rather play against good players than with silent ones. You did vote for Iliad, did you not?
-Sully
So, with all the crazy D1, there is a promise of some real input on D2. Great. Please note this post was made Sept 16
The next post is during D2, as promised, but here it is, the insightful post by Sully that he promises at the end of D1
Victor Sullivan wrote:Oh snappers! I must apologize, I forgot about this; I was busy over the end of last week and the weekend. Not that it particularly matters, since my vote was stolen anyway
I'll try to catch up. Seems to me I was taking heat yesterday, so I'll try to be quick-like! Thursdays I'm booked, but I'll see if I can't post something meaningful by Friday.
-Sully
This post was made Sept 27, but at least he was sorry. But we go through and realize that his vote is being stolen (shown by a vote count). He never stops to even check in to the thread after that and ask what is happening or talk about it. And he never lives up to his promise of D2 insight after night actions. This seems like an obvious attempt at scummarining. But it continues to yesterday when he hasn't made a post since october 1, and makes this comment 16 days after his last post (this time, no apologies!):
Victor Sullivan wrote:Fluff my muffins! I can't believe that.
-Sully
So I ask the town... At the very least he is not bringing anything to the table. I personally think that he is acting super scummy and not living up to the things he has said and is full of contradictions. In my eyes, his day 1 behavior was indicative of scum behavior, and the D2 and D3 behavior is just reinforcing it.
So I have enough evidence to make me feel comfortable
VOTE VICTOR SULLIVAN