Moderator: Community Team
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
betiko wrote:I can b wrong, but the thing with the gilipig case is that it's aparently his first mafia game;
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'd like to see a vote count before I post my opinions on gillipig or spiesr.
Let's analyze the events of this point a little more closely.DRoZ wrote:3) lashes out at vodean after voting against him, essentially doing the exact same thing as his own vote on betiko.
jonty125 wrote:betiko wrote:I can b wrong, but the thing with the gilipig case is that it's aparently his first mafia game;
I think he's a returning veteran. Anyhow, I do see where people are coming from with Gillipig sounding like he knows something about what happened last night. I'll vote him after we get a VC
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'd like to see a vote count before I post my opinions on gillipig or spiesr.
Why are you withholding your opinion? Withholding your vote, while waiting for a VC is perfectly valid; but why your opinions?
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
DRoZ wrote:Considering how spiesr does not seem to lead the charge on anyone, only justifying bandwagon jumps as well as retaliatory votes and accusations, combined with what could be a slight alliance with /, I feel somewhat justified with VOTE spiesr, considering everyone seems content with nag's refusal, I do not see anyone else to go with at the moment.
Come on now, you guys can't have it both ways. (Can you?)vodean wrote:as for gillipig, i think he is used to speed games which work a little differently. often they are smaller and have multiple SKs rather than an organized mafia. i dont think he is scummy, but rather is just new to our system.
spiesr, on the other hand, has been jumpy and defensive, with the aid of /, and has consistently attacked people and started BWs (as well as jumping on them). he is trying to lead town, but i think he is misleading us. i voted him yesterday for standing out as scum for a number of reasons on a number of occasions, and now im going to vote him again. unvote(if necessary) vote spiesr
lord voldemort wrote:betiko (2)- edocsil, jak111
new guy1 (1)- jonty125
spiesr (3)- DRoZ, betiko, Vodean
gillipig (5)- Nendreel, LSU Josh, spiesr, ghostly447, gregwolf121
Not Voting (9)- Nagerous, cm5, strike wolf, gillipig, new guy1, Mr. Squirrel, ShaggyDan, Illiad, /
With 20 alive it takes 11 to lynch. Deadline is currently not set.
spiesr wrote:Come on now, you guys can't have it both ways. (Can you?)
vodean wrote:as for gillipig, i think he is used to speed games which work a little differently. often they are smaller and have multiple SKs rather than an organized mafia. i dont think he is scummy, but rather is just new to our system.
spiesr, on the other hand, has been jumpy and defensive, with the aid of /, and has consistently attacked people and started BWs (as well as jumping on them). he is trying to lead town, but i think he is misleading us. i voted him yesterday for standing out as scum for a number of reasons on a number of occasions, and now im going to vote him again. unvote(if necessary) vote spiesr
vodean wrote:your earlier post stood out to me before, but now i think its enough for a vote. unvote vote spi
vodean wrote:I dont remember exactly what i saw, and in truth, i dont fully see it any more. but it was to do with jumping on whatever BW that came along, and you also do what you are accusing me of, voting without reason -- except worse. you quote another person, jump on their BW, and give no reason.
I suspect that edoc and betiko are actually talking about a currently active game and are just trying to cover their asses. I was in matrix mafia as a VT, not 3rd party. but you all seemed rather aggressive. betiko does not ALWAYS play aggressively, however, as he seems to want us to think, just in games where he is anti-town and two currently active ones. here i'd say they are both scum or town (or 3rd party) and are trying to get on the same page. they might be masoned. FOS betiko, but i think my vote stays on spiesr
vodean wrote: i voted him yesterday for standing out as scum for a number of reasons on a number of occasions, and now im going to vote him again. unvote(if necessary) vote spiesr
lord voldemort wrote:Vote Count 2.2
betiko (2)- edocsil, jak111
new guy1 (1)- jonty125
spiesr (3)- , DRoZ, betiko, Vodean
Gillipig (4)- Nendreel, LSU Josh, spiesr, ghostly447
jonty125 (1)- gregwolf121
Not Voting (10)- Nagerous, cm5, strike wolf, gillipig, Mr. Squirrel, ShaggyDan, Illiad, new guy1, /
gregwolf121 wrote:yeah internet is working again. so personally i don't see any real major leads yet, though DRoZ has an arguement that might turn something up, also gillipig where did you get your logical deductions from, you say that what you say is logical, i do agree that it is likely that there are more killers out there than the regular mafia night kill, but why bring it up, i do not see your reasoning behind this. but it does seem as if you have more knowledge than hey there might be one or you wouldn't have brought it up. so vote gillipig
gregwolf121 wrote:lord voldemort wrote:Vote Count 2.2
betiko (2)- edocsil, jak111
new guy1 (1)- jonty125
spiesr (3)- , DRoZ, betiko, Vodean
Gillipig (4)- Nendreel, LSU Josh, spiesr, ghostly447
jonty125 (1)- gregwolf121
Not Voting (10)- Nagerous, cm5, strike wolf, gillipig, Mr. Squirrel, ShaggyDan, Illiad, new guy1, /gregwolf121 wrote:yeah internet is working again. so personally i don't see any real major leads yet, though DRoZ has an arguement that might turn something up, also gillipig where did you get your logical deductions from, you say that what you say is logical, i do agree that it is likely that there are more killers out there than the regular mafia night kill, but why bring it up, i do not see your reasoning behind this. but it does seem as if you have more knowledge than hey there might be one or you wouldn't have brought it up. so vote gillipig
my vote was on gillipig
Well yes, but my point was that the seeming contradiction between the two opinions raises questions about whether they can both be valid at the same time.DRoZ wrote:Come on now, two different opinions from two different players....spiesr wrote:Come on now, you guys can't have it both ways. (Can you?)
lord voldemort wrote:gregwolf121 wrote:lord voldemort wrote:Vote Count 2.2
betiko (2)- edocsil, jak111
new guy1 (1)- jonty125
spiesr (3)- , DRoZ, betiko, Vodean
Gillipig (4)- Nendreel, LSU Josh, spiesr, ghostly447
jonty125 (1)- gregwolf121
Not Voting (10)- Nagerous, cm5, strike wolf, gillipig, Mr. Squirrel, ShaggyDan, Illiad, new guy1, /gregwolf121 wrote:yeah internet is working again. so personally i don't see any real major leads yet, though DRoZ has an arguement that might turn something up, also gillipig where did you get your logical deductions from, you say that what you say is logical, i do agree that it is likely that there are more killers out there than the regular mafia night kill, but why bring it up, i do not see your reasoning behind this. but it does seem as if you have more knowledge than hey there might be one or you wouldn't have brought it up. so vote gillipig
my vote was on gillipig
sure if you voted properly it might be
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Apparently Lovo was serious about bold & blue, as well as unvotes being required.gregwolf121 wrote:how did i vote wrong
lord voldemort wrote:5. All ‘votes’ and ‘unvotes’ must be in Bold and Blue. If they are not, they will not be tallied. (I.E. Vote: Nagerous). You must first unvote and then vote to change your vote from someone.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users