Moderators: Discussions Team, Global Moderators
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.

safariguy5 wrote:Damn, I'm going to have to claim responsibility for the DroZ death.
I'm Two Face, a town cop. However, after rereading my role PM more carefully, I finally understand the mechanic. Every night, I choose a target. As is true of my character, I flip a coin. Half the time, I investigate them. Half the time, I kill them. This must have been one of the times I killed them.
Now, since I replaced, my Night 1 result was an investigation on nagerous and that came back guilty.
Given that half the time, my role is a killing role, I think I would be extremely underpowered if I was also paranoid/insane. And if we want to talk flavor, the Harvey Dent side of Two Face has been shown to be a good person, at least in the comics. I had originally assumed that the warning in my PM about 50% being bad would be that the 50% would give me a bad investigation. But now I see it's a 50% vig kill.
Therefore, I assume my investigation side of things is true.
vote nagerous
For information about Jak's decision to drop some of his games refer to the H.P. Lovecraft Mafia Signups thread. Also, none of this is relevant to what Safariguy is saying as he replaced Illiad, not Jak.betiko wrote:My concern with your claim saf is this. that's jak's last post, and it was day 2. day 1 he was all over me, and day 2 he posted only 1 thing, this and he was still on me. Jak has been playing all his other mafia games and dropped this one. I don't really know in which other mafia games he's in but i think it would be strange to drop completely this one. He got in a pretty exciting position if he investigated on day 1 and got a guilty result... unfortunately his post was the one just before squirel claimed bus, and we learned that crazy visited nagerous instead of me... would ve been interesting to see how he would ve pressured him.
other than this everything seems to fit pretty well...
A situation where a person who has already claimed is certain to be the number 1 lynch target the next day is one of the least controversial Vig targets possible.betiko wrote:And no tiger, I already gave my opinion on this todya and yesterday. i really wanted to give gillpig the chance to speak up today.

safariguy5 wrote:Damn, I'm going to have to claim responsibility for the DroZ death.
I'm Two Face, a town cop. However, after rereading my role PM more carefully, I finally understand the mechanic. Every night, I choose a target. As is true of my character, I flip a coin. Half the time, I investigate them. Half the time, I kill them. This must have been one of the times I killed them.
Now, since I replaced, my Night 1 result was an investigation on nagerous and that came back guilty.
Given that half the time, my role is a killing role, I think I would be extremely underpowered if I was also paranoid/insane. And if we want to talk flavor, the Harvey Dent side of Two Face has been shown to be a good person, at least in the comics. I had originally assumed that the warning in my PM about 50% being bad would be that the 50% would give me a bad investigation. But now I see it's a 50% vig kill.
Therefore, I assume my investigation side of things is true.
vote nagerous

nagerous wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Damn, I'm going to have to claim responsibility for the DroZ death.
I'm Two Face, a town cop. However, after rereading my role PM more carefully, I finally understand the mechanic. Every night, I choose a target. As is true of my character, I flip a coin. Half the time, I investigate them. Half the time, I kill them. This must have been one of the times I killed them.
Now, since I replaced, my Night 1 result was an investigation on nagerous and that came back guilty.
Given that half the time, my role is a killing role, I think I would be extremely underpowered if I was also paranoid/insane. And if we want to talk flavor, the Harvey Dent side of Two Face has been shown to be a good person, at least in the comics. I had originally assumed that the warning in my PM about 50% being bad would be that the 50% would give me a bad investigation. But now I see it's a 50% vig kill.
Therefore, I assume my investigation side of things is true.
vote nagerous
So what happened to you night 2?

pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Yeah i read it and it is a bit lame to drop some games and sign up for others at the same time, that"s why i was saying all this.spiesr wrote:For information about Jak's decision to drop some of his games refer to the H.P. Lovecraft Mafia Signups thread.
You are perfectly right my bad, was pretty sure he replaced jak and didn't go on the OP to recheck. Iliad wrote 1 confirm and 1 substancial post (it is literally it!) just one post on day 1!! Let me finish answering your post iliad and i get back to the iliad/saf2.0 case.spiesr wrote:Also, none of this is relevant to what Safariguy is saying as he replaced Illiad, not Jak.
. Yes you are right, but what was the rush? now we all know who te vig is and we blindly killed a JOAT. I am sure that after seeing that the mafia roleblocker didn't do anything on night 1 acording to gillipig I would never have believed him today and would ve gone for his lynch whatever the explanations could be. But we would ve got a valuable info for day 4! he probably investigated someone last night. Gillipig would ve been the town lynch and nagerous the vig kill. we wouldn t ve had the vig outed + an extra investigation result or whatever he used night 2.spiesr wrote:A situation where a person who has already claimed is certain to be the number 1 lynch target the next day is one of the least controversial Vig targets possible.
Iliad wrote:Sorry guys, cookies trouble kept being logged out of CC. Technical issues over.
betiko's behaviour is just baffling to me. He collates a full flavour list, a list not really needed on day 1 and i don't see what why it was made. He responds aggressively and invites pressure onto himself essentially and then under the lightest pressure roleclaims, but only the flavour.betiko wrote:i'll save town some time as you are most probably going to continue this nonsense. I am Bane
you will not learn anymore from me, not even if someone fakeclaims my name. but I'm eager to see if any scum has the balls on day 1 to step up and fakeclaim!
Notice how assumes that he's immediately out of the clear. Not so fast.
Looks to me like a scum newbie who got a fakeclaim as part of his role, and was overeager and wanted to role claim as soon as possible thinking that'd make him in the "clear".
Let's get one thing clear about themed games. Fakeclaims given to mafia are very likely. Whenver I make themed games I usually make the decision to leave out a few relatively important characters out so mafia has credible fakeclaims. Otherwise it's endgame and the claims are Hermione,Ron, Professor Mcgonnagall and Groundskeeper #4 from Book 3. It's entirely possible that Bane is fakeclaim and I'm not a fan of assuming guilt based on flavour claims. Bekito's actual actions have been very scumy.
vote bekito

nagerous wrote:Iliad knows me well after playing many games with me so it is understandable that he would target me.
I think you should wait on saf before throwing your vote my way, I know I am innocent and in the clear.
nagerous wrote:Iliad knows me well after playing many games with me so it is understandable that he would target me.
I think you should wait on saf before throwing your vote my way, I know I am innocent and in the clear.
safariguy5 wrote:Damn, I'm going to have to claim responsibility for the DroZ death.
I'm Two Face, a town cop. However, after rereading my role PM more carefully, I finally understand the mechanic. Every night, I choose a target. As is true of my character, I flip a coin. Half the time, I investigate them. Half the time, I kill them. This must have been one of the times I killed them.
Now, since I replaced, my Night 1 result was an investigation on nagerous and that came back guilty.
Given that half the time, my role is a killing role, I think I would be extremely underpowered if I was also paranoid/insane. And if we want to talk flavor, the Harvey Dent side of Two Face has been shown to be a good person, at least in the comics. I had originally assumed that the warning in my PM about 50% being bad would be that the 50% would give me a bad investigation. But now I see it's a 50% vig kill.
Therefore, I assume my investigation side of things is true.
vote nagerous
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest