Conquer Club

Vote No Survivors because you were the oddest name on the list.

elonpuckhog wrote:Vote No Survivors because you were the oddest name on the list.

"With a name like that, he must be mafia!" Lol, I know it's clever but it's old lol.

new guy1 wrote:

zimmah wrote:

new guy1 wrote:The rules say 7, but who cares? Its day one . Vote zimmah for being first to confirm .

[color=#FF0000]Counter vote new guy!
[/color]
Also, your avatar is scummy

Lol, OMGUS'ing already? Guilty conscience? Though its early, I will FOS you.

It's not omgus, it's counter, learn the difference.

confirm and vote everyone for wasting time. unvote vote NoS for seeming the most defensive.

Well that escalated quickly... and there hasnt been a post in a while so I figured I would check and see if anyone had any ideas... Since theres 7 of us, and the game is apparently very hard on town, I dont want to take the risk of there also being an SK and losing right after this day (if that makes any sense). Maybe we should just see how everyone acts today and if there is someone acting funny then we can pressure for a claim and if there isnt then pressure an innactive for a claim... and if that fails then at least we havent put ourselves in a worse situation. IDK, I guess Im just rattling off what comes to mind.

Well, everyone's confirmed, but not everyone has posted anything of substance. Vio has only confirmed, but elonpuck hasn't posted anything except one joke vote, so I dunno who to put pressure on, if anyone.

Kanin Usagi wrote:Well, everyone's confirmed, but not everyone has posted anything of substance. Vio has only confirmed, but elonpuck hasn't posted anything except one joke vote, so I dunno who to put pressure on, if anyone.

Where exactly is your post of substance? Or anyones really?

elonpuckhog wrote:

Kanin Usagi wrote:Well, everyone's confirmed, but not everyone has posted anything of substance. Vio has only confirmed, but elonpuck hasn't posted anything except one joke vote, so I dunno who to put pressure on, if anyone.

Where exactly is your post of substance? Or anyones really?

Its the one you quoted.
And Vodean made a decent crack at one, and newguy.

Not buying it. Vodean looked to be a joke vote, as I took No Survivors comment towards my vote as a joke and vodeans comment on that as also a joke. Also, your post only points out that I haven't posted much. What about Zimmah and No Survivors? Why did you not mention them as having yet to post "anything of substance?" Fos Kanin...are you protecting Zimmah and No Survivors? Trying to lynch someone else as "inactive"? Seems pretty scummy to me.

And yes, I do realize that having three mafia is unlikely, but it makes no sense for Kanin to call out me and Violet for not posting when no one has posted.

elonpuckhog wrote:Not buying it. Vodean looked to be a joke vote, as I took No Survivors comment towards my vote as a joke and vodeans comment on that as also a joke. Also, your post only points out that I haven't posted much. What about Zimmah and No Survivors? Why did you not mention them as having yet to post "anything of substance?" Fos Kanin...are you protecting Zimmah and No Survivors? Trying to lynch someone else as "inactive"? Seems pretty scummy to me.

And yes, I do realize that having three mafia is unlikely, but it makes no sense for Kanin to call out me and Violet for not posting when no one has posted.

Yeah, but Zimmah and NoS were at least being somewhat active. I was just trying to point out the two least active so we could get something going on here and get both of you involved (which I've just partly succeeded with, judging by your response. Hah.) I definitely was not trying to point to either of you as being scum yourselves.

Also, I specifically said "I don't know who to put pressure on, if anyone." Mainly, I was just responding to newguy1's post.

Well, seems like jokes over, I'll see if I can add anything meaningfull in the afternoon.

Kanin Usagi wrote:

elonpuckhog wrote:Not buying it. Vodean looked to be a joke vote, as I took No Survivors comment towards my vote as a joke and vodeans comment on that as also a joke. Also, your post only points out that I haven't posted much. What about Zimmah and No Survivors? Why did you not mention them as having yet to post "anything of substance?" Fos Kanin...are you protecting Zimmah and No Survivors? Trying to lynch someone else as "inactive"? Seems pretty scummy to me.

And yes, I do realize that having three mafia is unlikely, but it makes no sense for Kanin to call out me and Violet for not posting when no one has posted.

Yeah, but Zimmah and NoS were at least being somewhat active. I was just trying to point out the two least active so we could get something going on here and get both of you involved (which I've just partly succeeded with, judging by your response. Hah.) I definitely was not trying to point to either of you as being scum yourselves.

Also, I specifically said "I don't know who to put pressure on, if anyone." Mainly, I was just responding to newguy1's post.

I did not write anything of substance.. I was just trying not to go inactive until the joke stage was over lol.

IMO, there's not much time for a joke stage considering day was only 5 RL days. Ill unvote since I believe joke vote stage to be over.

well, seems like vodean and kanin where the ones that ended the jokevote stage, not sure if that's a good thing, but it's worth noting i think.

new guy1 wrote:IMO, there's not much time for a joke stage considering day was only 5 RL days. Ill unvote since I believe joke vote stage to be over.

zimmah wrote:well, seems like vodean and kanin where the ones that ended the jokevote stage, not sure if that's a good thing, but it's worth noting i think.

Basically what new guy1 said. We've got, what, two days left? That is NOT enough time for us to be wasting 90% of it joke voting.

Oh, and unvote whoever my vote is on.

I think if we pressure anyone for a claim, it should be someone who is innactive. Also, I believe I am the one who ended joke voting, so you can add me to your note. I dont think its a bad thing because of the really short length of time we have and the simple fact that someone has to end it. Is it bad to advance the game when it has to happen anyways? Nope. In fact, I will make a small note on you, Zimmah, for not wanting the game to advance (apparently, since ending joke voting is noteworthy to you). So, who is currently the most innactive person? Wouldn't it be vioIet?

new guy1 wrote:I think if we pressure anyone for a claim, it should be someone who is innactive. Also, I believe I am the one who ended joke voting, so you can add me to your note. I dont think its a bad thing because of the really short length of time we have and the simple fact that someone has to end it. Is it bad to advance the game when it has to happen anyways? Nope. In fact, I will make a small note on you, Zimmah, for not wanting the game to advance (apparently, since ending joke voting is noteworthy to you). So, who is currently the most innactive person? Wouldn't it be vioIet?

Yes, I think we should get a prod on Vio.

new guy1 wrote:I think if we pressure anyone for a claim, it should be someone who is innactive. Also, I believe I am the one who ended joke voting, so you can add me to your note. I dont think its a bad thing because of the really short length of time we have and the simple fact that someone has to end it. Is it bad to advance the game when it has to happen anyways? Nope. In fact, I will make a small note on you, Zimmah, for not wanting the game to advance (apparently, since ending joke voting is noteworthy to you). So, who is currently the most innactive person? Wouldn't it be vioIet?

off course ending the jokevote stage is not scummy in itself, but the rush for a lynch without information is.

off course there can not be very much information day 1 and 5 days is not a lot of time, but still it seemed to me like certain persons were rushing it a little too much.

zimmah wrote:

new guy1 wrote:I think if we pressure anyone for a claim, it should be someone who is innactive. Also, I believe I am the one who ended joke voting, so you can add me to your note. I dont think its a bad thing because of the really short length of time we have and the simple fact that someone has to end it. Is it bad to advance the game when it has to happen anyways? Nope. In fact, I will make a small note on you, Zimmah, for not wanting the game to advance (apparently, since ending joke voting is noteworthy to you). So, who is currently the most innactive person? Wouldn't it be vioIet?

off course ending the jokevote stage is not scummy in itself, but the rush for a lynch without information is.

off course there can not be very much information day 1 and 5 days is not a lot of time, but still it seemed to me like certain persons were rushing it a little too much.

Well, I wouldn't say that people are rushing too much, because it has been like 3 days since this started if I'm correct. Therefore, even though the transition started after 2 days, we have waited long enough (maybe even too long) for the transition IMO, although you have explained your thought process and I can see where we differ in thoughts, so I am erasing the note on you.

Now that we have gotten that over with (hopefully), I would also like to request a prod on Vio, as I would like to hear from her. My only problem with this is that if we wait to hear from her, she may not respond before the deadline, or if she does and seems scummy enough to pressure then we wont have enough time to pressure her for a claim, which may not be in our favor depending on if we would like to no lynch or not.

with 7 people a miss-lynch is quite costly, but on the other hand a no lynch is not very useful either.

still, it'd say, if we have decent lead, i'd vouch for a no lynch, since lynching just for the sake of lynching does not give us enough information to warrant the loss of a player in such a small game, where we may have as little as 5 townies. On the other hand, if there's any reason to assume a lynch will provide a good lead for the next day, we should surely do it, as sacrificing a townie to catch a scum may seriously hurt the mafia since they too have very small numbers.

with so little players the game will probably end in like day 3 no matter what side wins, so even if there are any investigative roles in the game they will have very little opportunity to get some information out, if even they survive that long.

zimmah wrote:with 7 people a miss-lynch is quite costly, but on the other hand a no lynch is not very useful either.

still, i'd say, if we don't have a decent lead, i'd vouch for a no lynch, since lynching just for the sake of lynching does not give us enough information to warrant the loss of a player in such a small game, where we may have as little as 5 townies. On the other hand, if there's any reason to assume a lynch will provide a good lead for the next day, we should surely do it, as sacrificing a townie to catch a scum may seriously hurt the mafia since they too have very small numbers.

with so little players the game will probably end in like day 3 no matter what side wins, so even if there are any investigative roles in the game they will have very little opportunity to get some information out, if even they survive that long.

fixed typos

Well zimmah, the first page says that it will be very unbalanced towards town, making me believe this isnt your normal C9 game, etc.

Offical Vote Count

NoS-Vodean
kanin-elon
elon-kanin
vodean-NG1


Deadline will be extended till October (3 ish days)

my vote on NoS was serious. i thought he was jumpy and defensive about the joke-votes on him.

new guy1 wrote:Well zimmah, the first page says that it will be very unbalanced towards town, making me believe this isnt your normal C9 game, etc.

I re-read through page one to make sure that I wasn't skimming or blatantly missing something. I did not see any posts where crazymilkshake5 referred to this game as a C9. I wonder how I could've missed that? It could be great if someone could quote that post for me.