Moderator: Community Team
betiko wrote:edocsil wrote:IB, i would suggest not messing around with your anon vote. So long as I actually see it on Bet, I am game to follow. Also FOS PCM on similar grounds to Bet. IB's action was not worth a vote.
good. Then if you reread tell me where is my vote then.
Iron Butterfly wrote:Lets remember the starting point of this drama.
I decided at the last moment to vote gregwolf due to his inactivity. I was the one who put strong pressure on Edocsil. Everything was circumstantial evidence as we had nothing to go on. Towards the end I believed he was Town but he refused to claim so if he was going to be lynched it would be on him. It was after my last post I saw Gregwilf had been completely inactive.
We were pleasantly surprised to find that we had struck Mafia with a lynch. Granted we were lucky but the rational for ME was that I would rather lynch an inactive then let Edocsil be lynched for being stubborn. I followed my gut.
Now on Day two a COMPLETE WIFOM argument was first placed on me that I am somehow Mafia, who threw Greg under the bus for Town cred. I exclaimed the stupidity of this as It was only day one and would be a bad play on Mafias part. there would be nothing to gain as anyone who has an investigative role could check on me. There was no reason other then that to draw attention to Gregwolf if I were mafia. If I was mafia and Edocscil was Town I would have no reason to save Edocsil and expse Greg because for the most part everyone else would have been complicit in Edocsils lynch.
The second WIFOM has been put forth by Betiko that now Edoccil is mafia and I saved him and threw Greg under the bus. My part in this fiasco is my PM telling Betiko to "look at the game". I wanted to save Edocscil or at least take the pressure off of him....I even said so on the forum.
Now Betiko has turned it into one big conspiracy theory with a complete WIFOM argument.
You have to except that 1) I am mafia and Greg was mafia and I threw him under the bus when there was absolutely no reason to OR 2) Myself, Greg and Edocsil are mafia and without communication devised this genius of a plan so I could look good.
OR you can except I am Town. Put pressure on Edocsil for a claim and saw at the last minute that Gregwolf was inactive and when he did respond ddi not help his cause.
I explained why I changed my secrete vote from PCM to Betiko. If you don't agree with it tuff. My two votes will be on Betiko. I can easily remove them.
I also stated before that if I am lynched for this stupidity it will be no loss in the long run as it is day two. I would have mostly my self to blame. However its interesting watching people crawl out of the woodwork to throw in their two cents after the fact.
Iron Butterfly wrote:betiko wrote:edocsil wrote:IB, i would suggest not messing around with your anon vote. So long as I actually see it on Bet, I am game to follow. Also FOS PCM on similar grounds to Bet. IB's action was not worth a vote.
good. Then if you reread tell me where is my vote then.
Doom is not like room service where you PM him and he states, "right away sir"
I have put in my vote and told him to put my secrete vote on you as well.
Its my passive aggressive way of telling you how I feel about your WIFOM argument and play. Before ypu stomp off...It can easily be removed.
Iron Butterfly wrote:You didn't vote but you helped opened the can of worms. NOS first and then you expanded on it in another direction.My actions did as well with the PM.
Now we were splitting hairs with my double vote.
If you believe your case vote for it or the theory I am mafia then vote for it. If you do not believe it then say so and be done with it so I know where you stand. You either believe it or you don't.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
betiko wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:You didn't vote but you helped opened the can of worms. NOS first and then you expanded on it in another direction.My actions did as well with the PM.
Now we were splitting hairs with my double vote.
If you believe your case vote for it or the theory I am mafia then vote for it. If you do not believe it then say so and be done with it so I know where you stand. You either believe it or you don't.
dude:
1) NOS talks about a possibility that did go through my mind. I exposed it and also exposed the fact that you curiously PMd me and only me to go check the thread as if there was a major emergency (around 24H left), all this because you suddenly came up with the gregwolf case.
2) You give your claim which I would rather believe, but then you mess up. You tell all of us a lie when comes the moment to prove that you are a double voter, and supposedly vote PCM. The vote count shows an anonymous vote on NOS. "oh yeah, I got paranoid and thought it would be much better to vote for someone else without telling". Since you did that without backing your story previously, what could possibly look uglier than that?
3) You now say you switched your anonymous vote from PCM to me. What the hell? You've alread said the vote was casted on NOS not on PCM, now you're mixing up the story???
Do you realize that that's 3 very strange things you did? I think there is something about the vote mechanics you are lying about and you don't want to reveal for some reason. Either that you don't know how it goes, either that you are day 6 and it is day 6 and there is something you don't want to explain.
edocsil wrote:You are right bet critisism =/= vote. I will vote PCM for placing a vote on that ludicris case vs IB
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:edocsil wrote:You are right bet critisism =/= vote. I will vote PCM for placing a vote on that ludicris case vs IB
Beg pardon? He said his vote would go one way, an anonymus vote went another way. Who's to say he was even responsible for that vote? You yourself suggested the possibility of a scum double voter yesterday, so I can't see you having a mind to doubt the possibility. That's not even accounting for the whole PM business, which is a serious breach of the rules and I'm surprised no warning or modkill was handed down.
At this point, it can't be denied that he's got a double vote with the vote on betiko, but he could still be scum (again, your own suggestion opens up that possibility). Granted, that doesn't make it fact, but it doesn't discount it. Unless, that is, you know something we don't. Matter of fact, it seems odd to me you're just willing to follow simply because his vote exists.
I stopped reading after your first sentence (well not really but you get the point "He said his vote would go one way, an anonymus vote went another way. Who's to say he was even responsible for that vote?"
So The anon and I voted at the same time without collaboration. Yup makes perfect sense. Just blind luck...maybe ill hit lotto next. If the anon is a fellow mafia who "helped me" we would have to coordinate (and before we go further dont even try to suggest that if I did it with Betiko whats to stop me doing it again. It was poor judgement end of story) or he would have to guess.
If the anon vote is Town well then step forward and call me a liar so you can lynch me. They wont because if that happens I flip Town and one more mafia will go down next day.
@IB: You keep saying "when there was no need to". Why would you say there was no need? Scum always have need of town cred. That's ridiculous to suggest that there would be no value in bussing a scummate.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
edocsil wrote:You are right bet critisism =/= vote. I will vote PCM for placing a vote on that ludicris case vs IB
new guy1 wrote:Okay jonty, good job, I didnt even realize I was skimming -_-. Also, I love how your case on me comes in when theres pressure on someone else. Lets finish our course of actions on this case before we move onto another, alright?
fastposted.
pancakemix wrote:edocsil wrote:You are right bet critisism =/= vote. I will vote PCM for placing a vote on that ludicris case vs IB
Beg pardon? He said his vote would go one way, an anonymus vote went another way. Who's to say he was even responsible for that vote? You yourself suggested the possibility of a scum double voter yesterday, so I can't see you having a mind to doubt the possibility. That's not even accounting for the whole PM business, which is a serious breach of the rules and I'm surprised no warning or modkill was handed down.
At this point, it can't be denied that he's got a double vote with the vote on betiko, but he could still be scum (again, your own suggestion opens up that possibility). Granted, that doesn't make it fact, but it doesn't discount it. Unless, that is, you know something we don't. Matter of fact, it seems odd to me you're just willing to follow simply because his vote exists.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
pancakemix wrote:I've acknowledged you have a double vote. I'm saying it doesn't mean you're town. With the NOS vote it wouldn't have to be dumb luck, because the theoretical vote owner could do what he darn well pleases.
It makes no sense whatsoever. You've acknowledged I'm a double voter but say that I could still be mafia. if you think I'm mafia then your logic dictates I threw Greg under the bus. If that is the case then why did you not participate with your suspicions about me being mafia UNTIL you became involved with the vote? You were dead silent up to that point.
I see very few downsides to advocating the lynch of a scummate you think isn't going to contribute. He's dead in the water at that point already. That's one good reason right there to do it apart from town cred. You see, you say it would be bad strategy to do this, but you don't elaborate on how.
I meant "bussing" in the sense of "throwing under the bus". Sorry for the confusion.
It makes no sense whatsoever. You've acknowledged I'm a double voter but say that I could still be mafia. if you think I'm mafia then your logic dictates I threw Greg under the bus. If that is the case then why did you not participate with your suspicions about me being mafia UNTIL you became involved with the vote? You were dead silent up to that point.
Greg was not dead in the water UNTIL I called him on his inactivity. He even said he was monitoring the game. He would have flown under the radar as Edocscil was lynched so its not like his ship was sinking and I jumped on him to look good. If I were mafia there would be no reason to throw Greg under the bus as Edocsil was most likely going to be lynched.
What I find scummy is you keep misrepresenting the information provided to make it into something it is not.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
betiko wrote:soundman wrote:betiko wrote:no soundman, it was 2,5 days left out of 7
and yeah what's up with nos.... he's trying very hard to be targeted skimming, never voting and openly scummarining?
No betiko, it wasn't. How about you go take another look? The vote count before my post clearly states that there were only two days until deadline. And you even posted right after the count saying almost the same thing I did! Here's the link to that vote count. http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=213&t=180800&start=75#p3955591betiko wrote:I'm going to wait, but IB, the way you played your double vote seems like a pile of bullcrap. Give a reasonable explanation, because i don't see any.
He gave his reason, what more could he say?
Vote Betiko. You have been skimming, posting illogical posts (at least IMO) and contradicting yourself.
Fastposted.
here is the timing of your post on my browser:
by soundman on 14 Nov 2012, 02:15
here is the timing of doom's deadline on my browser:
Postby DoomYoshi on 16 Nov 2012, 07:20
that's 2 days and 5h. A bit less than 2,5 days as I said and a bit more than 1,5 days as you said. Shall we call it even as I'm 7h wrong and you are 17h wrong?
Can you quote what you call skimming and posting illogical stuff appart from that "case" and where I have been contradicting myself? thank you!
DoomYoshi wrote:Vote Count
gregwolf121 (1) - pancakemix
Kanin Usagi (1) - edocsil
vodean (2) - ghostly447, betiko, edoc
Nendreel (1) - soundman
Ghostly (1) - new guy1
soundman (1) - Nendreel
Not Voting - Iron Butterfly, NoSurvivors, gregwolf121, vodean, jonty125, Kanin
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch (or a majority at deadline).
Deadline is Thursday. (2 days left)
6 players without a vote.
This means 9 players agree to have vodean lynched on Thursday.
soundman wrote:Unvote. Well no one has done anything suspicious yet so that leaves us with a random lynch. It's looking like Vodean is going to be the target at this point. I say if he has an important role then he should claim.
betiko wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Time is starting to slow down things.
we got 2 days left and obviously everyone is avoiding to say anything.. why not make vode claim instead of getting him lynched on thursday if things stay this way?
soundman wrote:betiko wrote:soundman wrote:betiko wrote:no soundman, it was 2,5 days left out of 7
and yeah what's up with nos.... he's trying very hard to be targeted skimming, never voting and openly scummarining?
No betiko, it wasn't. How about you go take another look? The vote count before my post clearly states that there were only two days until deadline. And you even posted right after the count saying almost the same thing I did! Here's the link to that vote count. http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=213&t=180800&start=75#p3955591betiko wrote:I'm going to wait, but IB, the way you played your double vote seems like a pile of bullcrap. Give a reasonable explanation, because i don't see any.
He gave his reason, what more could he say?
Vote Betiko. You have been skimming, posting illogical posts (at least IMO) and contradicting yourself.
Fastposted.
here is the timing of your post on my browser:
by soundman on 14 Nov 2012, 02:15
here is the timing of doom's deadline on my browser:
Postby DoomYoshi on 16 Nov 2012, 07:20
that's 2 days and 5h. A bit less than 2,5 days as I said and a bit more than 1,5 days as you said. Shall we call it even as I'm 7h wrong and you are 17h wrong?
Can you quote what you call skimming and posting illogical stuff appart from that "case" and where I have been contradicting myself? thank you!
Since you obviously can't use a link I'll quote the posts for you. Here is Doom's count where he clearly says two days left:DoomYoshi wrote:Vote Count
gregwolf121 (1) - pancakemix
Kanin Usagi (1) - edocsil
vodean (2) - ghostly447, betiko, edoc
Nendreel (1) - soundman
Ghostly (1) - new guy1
soundman (1) - Nendreel
Not Voting - Iron Butterfly, NoSurvivors, gregwolf121, vodean, jonty125, Kanin
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch (or a majority at deadline).
Deadline is Thursday. (2 days left)
6 players without a vote.
This means 9 players agree to have vodean lynched on Thursday.
Now here is my post eight posts later:soundman wrote:Unvote. Well no one has done anything suspicious yet so that leaves us with a random lynch. It's looking like Vodean is going to be the target at this point. I say if he has an important role then he should claim.
What don't you understand about that? Clearly less than two days till deadline when I posted that. That is why I have you for skimming. Now here is the contradiction part:betiko wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Time is starting to slow down things.
we got 2 days left and obviously everyone is avoiding to say anything.. why not make vode claim instead of getting him lynched on thursday if things stay this way?
You say "why not have vodean claim?" right after the vote count. Then several posts later I said something very similar and now your on me for it. When you said the same thing!
ghostly447 wrote:2 anon's. Edocsil was prob wrong about his assumption there were no mafia double voters.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:ghostly447 wrote:2 anon's. Edocsil was prob wrong about his assumption there were no mafia double voters.
Well. That is quite curious.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users