Moderator: Community Team
Metsfanmax wrote:In my mind blake has been scummarining for most of this game, so I roleblocked him last night. Hopefully this doesn't become another repeat of last time.
Vote blakebowling
(fastposted by ana)
Metsfanmax wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:In my mind blake has been scummarining for most of this game, so I roleblocked him last night. Hopefully this doesn't become another repeat of last time.
Vote blakebowling
(fastposted by ana)
Also, my character is male, so if there's any substance to the scenes, then I stopped the first one, who was targeting Annie.
anamainiacks wrote:Not sure how accurate the scenes are, especially since they mention a lot of character names. I don't think it would be fair for the killers to know the names of the character they're targeting.
aage wrote:anamainiacks wrote:Not sure how accurate the scenes are, especially since they mention a lot of character names. I don't think it would be fair for the killers to know the names of the character they're targeting.
This indeed would not be fair. Nor would anything flavour-related be fair. This is why I drew up the rule. Might be I used Annie's name to give a hint. Might be it's just how the scene goes in the show.
anamainiacks wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:In my mind blake has been scummarining for most of this game, so I roleblocked him last night. Hopefully this doesn't become another repeat of last time.
Vote blakebowling
(fastposted by ana)
Also, my character is male, so if there's any substance to the scenes, then I stopped the first one, who was targeting Annie.
Not sure how accurate the scenes are, especially since they mention a lot of character names. I don't think it would be fair for the killers to know the names of the character they're targeting.
But yea, since this is the only lead we have so far, vote blakebowling.
Gustaf Wasa wrote:My thoughts:
Strange night scene. Were there three killers in there, and two targets, and no one got killed? Wow. Or maybe I'm reading that wrong. Anyway, two Mafia teams, or one Mafia team and one Vig/SK? Then shouldn't there have been two kills on other nights? Could the town protectors really be so lucky as to block either one or two kills every night?
We have no other night info than that blakebowling was roleblocked? Reading your post now, blakebowling, I don't see a comment on the fact that you were roleblocked and there was no kill. If you were roleblocked but still town, that would mean we would need two more protecting roles (roleblock or Doc) to neutralize the two kills.
But Metsfanmax could also be making it up to get blakebowling lynched.
Gustaf Wasa wrote:Strange night scene. Were there three killers in there, and two targets, and no one got killed? Wow. Or maybe I'm reading that wrong. Anyway, two Mafia teams, or one Mafia team and one Vig/SK? Then shouldn't there have been two kills on other nights? Could the town protectors really be so lucky as to block either one or two kills every night?
blakebowling wrote:I'm open to the possibility of a busdriver or some other interference with Mets block (this would make sense from the scene as well, as there was a silent man in the first confrontation with Annie), and of course as Gustaf said the block on me could be unrelated (i.e. another blocker / protective role stopped the kill). It's also possible (though highly unlikely IMO) that one of the kill attempts could have been on a bulletproof -- however the flavor of the scene doesn't point towards that.
[...]
If someone potentially interfered with mets' block on me (busdriving me with someone else, or otherwise), please speak up.
So a bus driver might be possible. Or rishaed was a Vig kill and a protector stopped the scumkill (but that's just crazy). Yea, so if anyone has information, that'd be great.TA1LGUNN3R, on Day 3, following rishaed's lynch wrote:blakebowling wrote:Well I suppose rishaed's strategy worked (somehow?). A VT NK is leagues ahead of a Town PR NK.
I wouldn't go so far as to say it worked. Rishaed imo wasn't a great pick for scum kill. Here's my reasoning: rishaed was making good work for getting himself lynched in a day or two. If I were scum I'd've let him stew in his own mess, thereby avoiding attention and reaping benefits.
No, I'm seeing something along the lines of actions getting switched somewhere or overeager vig.
blakebowling wrote:I'm also confused about why the scene for D4 was different from the other two. There were no kills N1, but the scene made it seem like there wasn't a kill attempt, N2 there was a kill, but there was no confrontation or detail, just a pointer towards who had been killed. I assume it's possible that actions lined up similarly to a scene in the show, so aage used it. And of course it's always possible I'm reading a bit too much into flavor and the differences mean nothing. I think it's meaningful only because upon magnitude's death, the scene in which he died in the show wasn't used.
Gustaf Wasa wrote:We have no other night info than that blakebowling was roleblocked? Reading your post now, blakebowling, I don't see a comment on the fact that you were roleblocked and there was no kill. If you were roleblocked but still town, that would mean we would need two more protecting roles (roleblock or Doc) to neutralize the two kills.
anamainiacks wrote:Hank44Soccer wrote:Vote Rishaed I'm hopping on the bandwagon!Hank44Soccer wrote:Could we get a vote count?Hank44Soccer wrote:Ok, which one of you made that terrible smell in the men's room?Hank44Soccer wrote:Hello all, apologies for the lack of posts, as mentioned by others before, the game was moving very slowly, and I figured I just didn't have much to contribute, so I should just wait. Well, clearly I waited to long, I have no intention in dead-beating in this game, and in the future I will look to post more often. If anyone feels that this is "Scummy", I don't have a problem in claiming if that will help move things along.Hank44Soccer wrote:Vote GregWolf21 due to lack of evidence and defense.
These are ALL the posts Hank has made in the entire game so far.
- Both times he cast a vote, he was (blindly?) hopping on a bandwagon.
- Every time he's posted, he has said nothing of value.
- He said that he had "no intention of deadbeating" and promised to post more often. But that has yet to happen.
- To Hank: Please give more details and support as to why you're voting for Gregwolf.
Commie wrote:No offence, but your story is way weaker now than it was before, rishaed. Before day 2, I was not completely sure what to make of it all, but now it just seems that you are a scum who accidentally attracted too much attention and now is trying to find some sort of explanation that would tailor to your behaviour.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
Gustaf Wasa wrote:Those are valid points by Tailgunner.
Hank44Soccer - inactive
Commander9 - inactive
blakebowling - roleblocked
BUT, the scene shows people actively trying to kill. I know, we shouldn't read too much into the night scenes. But I believe we can read something into the scenes. I just don't think our mod would write such elaborate scenes, deliberately picking parts from the TV show where kills are stopped, if the reason for the no-kill is simply inactivity. That would amount to blatant disinformation from the mod, since he knows we will most likely think the scene means something.
Metsfanmax wrote:I bet he just enjoys watching us trying to figure out what's useful info and what's not.
blakebowling wrote:Gustaf Wasa wrote:Those are valid points by Tailgunner.
Hank44Soccer - inactive
Commander9 - inactive
blakebowling - roleblocked
BUT, the scene shows people actively trying to kill. I know, we shouldn't read too much into the night scenes. But I believe we can read something into the scenes. I just don't think our mod would write such elaborate scenes, deliberately picking parts from the TV show where kills are stopped, if the reason for the no-kill is simply inactivity. That would amount to blatant disinformation from the mod, since he knows we will most likely think the scene means something.
Just because players haven't been posting in the thread doesn't mean they haven't been sending in actions
anamainiacks wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I bet he just enjoys watching us trying to figure out what's useful info and what's not.
blakebowling wrote:Gustaf Wasa wrote:Those are valid points by Tailgunner.
Hank44Soccer - inactive
Commander9 - inactive
blakebowling - roleblocked
BUT, the scene shows people actively trying to kill. I know, we shouldn't read too much into the night scenes. But I believe we can read something into the scenes. I just don't think our mod would write such elaborate scenes, deliberately picking parts from the TV show where kills are stopped, if the reason for the no-kill is simply inactivity. That would amount to blatant disinformation from the mod, since he knows we will most likely think the scene means something.
Just because players haven't been posting in the thread doesn't mean they haven't been sending in actions
Agreed. Request for aage to give Hank and Commander a prod.
blakebowling wrote:Just because players haven't been posting in the thread doesn't mean they haven't been sending in actions
Gustaf Wasa wrote:blakebowling wrote:Just because players haven't been posting in the thread doesn't mean they haven't been sending in actions
Then we are back to this: if Metsfanmax roleblocked you, and you are town, then there would have to be two other protector roles (Doc, roleblocker....) for the kills to be blocked. Three protectors among ten players.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users