Moderator: Community Team
jonty125 wrote:Busdriver is 99% town, mafia busdrivers are very powerful and hence very rare.
new guy1 wrote:I think thats it. I would vote lynx, but I havent seen him in any other games, and so I blame his directing of the town (jonty and stubs are 99% confirmed town, listen to them) on being foreign to the forums.
Comrade Kirk wrote:new guy1 wrote:I think thats it. I would vote lynx, but I havent seen him in any other games, and so I blame his directing of the town (jonty and stubs are 99% confirmed town, listen to them) on being foreign to the forums.
I would agree that Stubs and Jonty are most likely town (one has claimed McNulty and was most likely the drunk driver who was targeted by the mafia, and the other was cleared by McNulty). I find it strange that you chose to attack that part of Lynx's player summary. A PGO claim is also a very easy way for the mafia to avoid investigations. The only reason I'm not voting for you after that "defense" is that I think your character is very likely to be in the game and the role fits with the flavour.
I personally think that ghostly's attempt to support Betiko's defense is suspicious. That's where my vote is going.
Vote: ghostly447
Comrade Kirk wrote:new guy1 wrote:I think thats it. I would vote lynx, but I havent seen him in any other games, and so I blame his directing of the town (jonty and stubs are 99% confirmed town, listen to them) on being foreign to the forums.
I would agree that Stubs and Jonty are most likely town (one has claimed McNulty and was most likely the drunk driver who was targeted by the mafia, and the other was cleared by McNulty). I find it strange that you chose to attack that part of Lynx's player summary. A PGO claim is also a very easy way for the mafia to avoid investigations. The only reason I'm not voting for you after that "defense" is that I think your character is very likely to be in the game and the role fits with the flavour.
I personally think that ghostly's attempt to support Betiko's defense is suspicious. That's where my vote is going.
Vote: ghostly447
Djfireside wrote:Im trying to determine if there is any other way that you could be who you say you are and for this still to work. I guess a mafia BD would cover it if they understand the role and understanding the players which a few fit the bill, framer may be a stretch but a possibility but not one I am leaning on.
In my head there are 3 possibilties. Its either you are a Mafia RB, You are third party and getting claimed as bad or there is a strange Tied Lover type connection between you two (which is a damn stretch), or you got BD'ed.
At this point I guess will have to watch how the chips fly and what others have to add since you have made a decent plea for yourself. You are wrong on your first thought, I am not an SK.
I will leave my vote where it is for now but curious to have others chime in.
Comrade Kirk wrote:new guy1 wrote:I think thats it. I would vote lynx, but I havent seen him in any other games, and so I blame his directing of the town (jonty and stubs are 99% confirmed town, listen to them) on being foreign to the forums.
I would agree that Stubs and Jonty are most likely town (one has claimed McNulty and was most likely the drunk driver who was targeted by the mafia, and the other was cleared by McNulty). I find it strange that you chose to attack that part of Lynx's player summary. A PGO claim is also a very easy way for the mafia to avoid investigations. The only reason I'm not voting for you after that "defense" is that I think your character is very likely to be in the game and the role fits with the flavour.
I personally think that ghostly's attempt to support Betiko's defense is suspicious. That's where my vote is going.
Vote: ghostly447
ghostly447 wrote:Im sorry guys, I did try posting when I got my role pm, but it said there was an error with the site, I left it for a few hours, did some stuff around the house, and it evaded my thoughts that night. And now I finally got time to read up. I confirm that I got my role on the 12th, and actually didnt visit the site all of yesterday (hanging out with friends all day, and till about 5am last night). I am here now, and just getting back into the swing of logging in the play a mafia game (havent played in ages).
Adam
ghostly447 wrote:Similar to a previous game I played (pokemon 2? it was Dooms) I had a role where I had to live as a survivor, but also had to eliminate zimmah. This, or at least a variation of it, could give another possibility that Jonty needs him dead (because someone said that they hated each other) either ending the game with his win, or completing part of his personal agenda.
I don't know the flavour, but is new guy's role more or less likely to be in the game than betiko's false-claim, Rawls? I ask because on my other forum, in games with heavy flavour like this scum will normally have safe-claims.Comrade Kirk wrote:The only reason I'm not voting for [new guy] after that "defense" is that I think your character is very likely to be in the game and the role fits with the flavour.
Why are you so worried about appearing scummy? Once again, I can see this post being made from a scum POV.new guy1 wrote:Thats another thing that irritates me on this forum. If I dont give anyone else to look at/my thoughts on things, then its I havent said enough and thats scummy. If I give my take on it, thats scummy. Is there any way to get around looking scummy when all you're trying to do is literally give your input? I understand PGO is a pretty bad claim as far as being trustworthy, but damn at least give me a chance -_-.
Also lynx, if I wanted to come off as defensive, I would have voted you. You're talking as if I voted you. A little on edge there, lynx?
new guy1 wrote:I would vote lynx, but I havent seen him in any other games, and so I blame his directing of the town (jonty and stubs are 99% confirmed town, listen to them) on being foreign to the forums.
Ping! Don't like being singled out, eh?ghostly447 wrote:Im sorry, but last I checked, if you are going to try to single someone out for a certain reason, you need to include everyone. I dont mind the pressure on me, but dont lose site of everyone else.
lynx_ wrote:I don't know the flavour, but is new guy's role more or less likely to be in the game than betiko's false-claim, Rawls? I ask because on my other forum, in games with heavy flavour like this scum will normally have safe-claims.Comrade Kirk wrote:The only reason I'm not voting for [new guy] after that "defense" is that I think your character is very likely to be in the game and the role fits with the flavour.Why are you so worried about appearing scummy? Once again, I can see this post being made from a scum POV.new guy1 wrote:Thats another thing that irritates me on this forum. If I dont give anyone else to look at/my thoughts on things, then its I havent said enough and thats scummy. If I give my take on it, thats scummy. Is there any way to get around looking scummy when all you're trying to do is literally give your input? I understand PGO is a pretty bad claim as far as being trustworthy, but damn at least give me a chance -_-.
Also lynx, if I wanted to come off as defensive, I would have voted you. You're talking as if I voted you. A little on edge there, lynx?
And I don't think you *wanted* to come off as defensive, nor did I think you voted me. I was referring to this part of your post:new guy1 wrote:I would vote lynx, but I havent seen him in any other games, and so I blame his directing of the town (jonty and stubs are 99% confirmed town, listen to them) on being foreign to the forums.Ping! Don't like being singled out, eh?ghostly447 wrote:Im sorry, but last I checked, if you are going to try to single someone out for a certain reason, you need to include everyone. I dont mind the pressure on me, but dont lose site of everyone else.
StubbsKVM wrote:Nobody has talked about spiesr yet. He tried spreading some confusion on Jonty's cop claim on day 1. Do you still feel the same way spiesr?
Actually, this is the only analysis that spiesr has attempted. And I remember being somewhat suspicious about it even at the time, IMO this is weak reasoning for attacking a relatively townie player.spiesr wrote:Vote Jonty, his responses to recent actions have given me the vibe that he is trying to jump on everything that comes up. If I extrapolate this, possibly unreasonably, it points towards him hoping that any of that sticks and a "lynch anybody but me" mentality. This vote is weak but should suffice at this time of Day.
lynx_ wrote:Actually, this is the only analysis that spiesr has attempted. And I remember being somewhat suspicious about it even at the time, IMO this is weak reasoning for attacking a relatively townie player.spiesr wrote:Vote Jonty, his responses to recent actions have given me the vibe that he is trying to jump on everything that comes up. If I extrapolate this, possibly unreasonably, it points towards him hoping that any of that sticks and a "lynch anybody but me" mentality. This vote is weak but should suffice at this time of Day.
spiesr, who do you think is the most scummy player currently?
Unvote
Vote: spiesr
ghostly447 wrote:Djfireside wrote:Im trying to determine if there is any other way that you could be who you say you are and for this still to work. I guess a mafia BD would cover it if they understand the role and understanding the players which a few fit the bill, framer may be a stretch but a possibility but not one I am leaning on.
In my head there are 3 possibilties. Its either you are a Mafia RB, You are third party and getting claimed as bad or there is a strange Tied Lover type connection between you two (which is a damn stretch), or you got BD'ed.
At this point I guess will have to watch how the chips fly and what others have to add since you have made a decent plea for yourself. You are wrong on your first thought, I am not an SK.
I will leave my vote where it is for now but curious to have others chime in.
So kirk, why you going after me when dj decided to start it? Im sorry, but last I checked, if you are going to try to single someone out for a certain reason, you need to include everyone. I dont mind the pressure on me, but dont lose site of everyone else.
Adam
Djfireside wrote:ghostly447 wrote:Djfireside wrote:Im trying to determine if there is any other way that you could be who you say you are and for this still to work. I guess a mafia BD would cover it if they understand the role and understanding the players which a few fit the bill, framer may be a stretch but a possibility but not one I am leaning on.
In my head there are 3 possibilties. Its either you are a Mafia RB, You are third party and getting claimed as bad or there is a strange Tied Lover type connection between you two (which is a damn stretch), or you got BD'ed.
At this point I guess will have to watch how the chips fly and what others have to add since you have made a decent plea for yourself. You are wrong on your first thought, I am not an SK.
I will leave my vote where it is for now but curious to have others chime in.
So kirk, why you going after me when dj decided to start it? Im sorry, but last I checked, if you are going to try to single someone out for a certain reason, you need to include everyone. I dont mind the pressure on me, but dont lose site of everyone else.
Adam
SO I get the divert from this one? I simply was listing out any way that he could be who he was and how it may play in however I thought I was able to do it since I was also the one who listed out why his fake claim really didnt work. I had my vote on and left and took the backlask from him.
Ive had my doubts on Kirk but will grant him some leeway at this point
lynx_ wrote:Actually, this is the only analysis that spiesr has attempted. And I remember being somewhat suspicious about it even at the time, IMO this is weak reasoning for attacking a relatively townie player.spiesr wrote:Vote Jonty, his responses to recent actions have given me the vibe that he is trying to jump on everything that comes up. If I extrapolate this, possibly unreasonably, it points towards him hoping that any of that sticks and a "lynch anybody but me" mentality. This vote is weak but should suffice at this time of Day.
spiesr, who do you think is the most scummy player currently?
Unvote
Vote: spiesr
safariguy5 wrote:Comrade Kirk wrote:new guy1 wrote:ghostly447 wrote:Similar to a previous game I played (pokemon 2? it was Dooms) I had a role where I had to live as a survivor, but also had to eliminate zimmah. This, or at least a variation of it, could give another possibility that Jonty needs him dead (because someone said that they hated each other) either ending the game with his win, or completing part of his personal agenda.
I assume you're talking about the second post. This is hardly an out and out defense of betiko. I think you're misrepresenting it to give yourself a weak reason to bandwagon a vote.
vote Comrade Kirk
Comrade Kirk wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Comrade Kirk wrote:new guy1 wrote:ghostly447 wrote:Similar to a previous game I played (pokemon 2? it was Dooms) I had a role where I had to live as a survivor, but also had to eliminate zimmah. This, or at least a variation of it, could give another possibility that Jonty needs him dead (because someone said that they hated each other) either ending the game with his win, or completing part of his personal agenda.
I assume you're talking about the second post. This is hardly an out and out defense of betiko. I think you're misrepresenting it to give yourself a weak reason to bandwagon a vote.
vote Comrade Kirk
I know that it's not an out and out defense, which is what makes it suspicious. It would be a bad move for scum to attach themselves too strongly to someone who has been caught by the cop. Ghostly's post was designed to spread doubt about the validity of the cop's evidence whilst also keeping his distance from Betiko.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users