Roberth wrote:I have now tried to rotate the map. Don't mind some crudeness in pixelated graphics and placement of text and army numbers. I just made this quick to see how it would be if it was rotated.
I don't think it makes any big difference and feel like the version before is better. What do you think? Is this rotated version better?
Gillipig wrote:It just feels weird for me to look at Sweden tilted like that. Therefore I can't support the it! I support the map though! Good work Roberth thanks to you we swedes might have a home map soon !
natty dread wrote:If on the other hand you have "it looks weird" and on the other you have "it's hard to read and is too cluttered", which do you think is better overall?
Bruceswar wrote:natty dread wrote:If on the other hand you have "it looks weird" and on the other you have "it's hard to read and is too cluttered", which do you think is better overall?
The Fix to both answers... Supersize it. We have the tools now, so lets use them.
It’s not perhaps a sentiment one has too often in life, but it can be said without hesitation that the past year or so has been a good one for popular accounts of the lives of 17th-century English polymaths.
Roberth wrote:Industrial Helix wrote:Just throwing this out there, but this map could use some texture.
You mean that the territories should have textures?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users