koontz1973 wrote:this solve everything. and allows you to be totaly free
Correct, whilst the map has a grain of truth to it, started as an idea, followed by the LofN, followed by the UN, it is purely fictional. That is why the country in the middle has no name to it. But I used African capital names that are no longer capitals. Abidjan was the former capital to the Ivory coast.now about gameplay: could be number of held countries (5) which allows player to attack Military action or Diplomats higher? lets say 7? I assume that all countries will be divided between players as starting positions, yes?
No problem raising it.
And yes, all countries will be divided. Only the centre will start as all neutral.
Think of the map like Arms Race, the two sides are the same as the two maps on that map. The middle are the rockets. I need to make sure both sides have he same total bonus so that still needs to be looked at. What I mean is if you hold all of the left side, you get (x)bonus, the right side should be the same.
The neutrals for both routes to win are equal so should the left side only attack Military action and the right diplomats? This would mean the the middle map would come into play a lot more.
I disagree with the bolded part. I don't think both sides necessarily have to be equal. There can be an advantage to one side over the other. I know we'll hear complaints about drops and so forth, but thats part of the game.
This map looks good. Looking forward to being able to play it relatively soonish.