If its too hard, dont worry, I can work around it.Telvannia wrote:i will keep trying though seeing if i can find what is wrong with it
Just adding it to this pagegavin_sidhu wrote:
by attractive do you mean appealing? Attractiveness i can fix, appeal is a little harder to change.Marvaddin wrote:Really, this map is not attractive to many people, by the way...
About the font, I would go with Lakshadweep or Madhya.
In the troubled north i have (even though its not written there) a rule which allows any country in the region to attack any other country in the region eg. Badakshan could attack Himachal Pradesh. Also if i split the north up like that it wouldn't be too geographically correct, Badakhshan is part of Afghanistan and AC although claimed by india, is occupied by China. I think your idea about the 5 bonuses for holding 2 subcontinents is good but i dont think it will work with this map because the area is not in the centre of the map, but off to one side.mightyal wrote:I find this map appealing.
What do you think about exending the Afghanistan & Pakistan concept by splitting The Troubled North in half?
ie. 1 army each for either Indian Controlled North (J&K, HP and AC) or Pakistan Controlled North; 5 for holding both.
Or you could offer a 5 bonus for holding any 2 of the 4 continents with 1 bonus.
mightyal wrote:I'd forgotten about all countries in The Troubled North being able to attack each other. That's a great idea; you should have a symbol (suicide bomber IMO) on each country to emphasize that and state on the legend what the symbol means.
gavin_sidhu wrote:I think ill keep burma as is.
To Happysadfun: Could u plz edit ur picture out, it being so large makes it so annoying to read any other posts.
U sure reverend_kyle, i tried using photoshop (albeit only for 5 minutes without reading the instructions) nd found it had pretty much the same things as GIMP.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users