Moderator: Cartographers
walnutwatson wrote:The map is looking great. I'm sure there's some reason with it being this far down the line but what's the reason for half of Yorkshire being swallowed up by Derbyshire. Nothing against Derbyshire, it's a lovely place, but it's only about a third the size of Yorkshire whereas on your map it's about twice as big as Yorkshire.
Are you supporting the House of Lancaster by any chance?
bspride wrote:walnutwatson wrote:The map is looking great. I'm sure there's some reason with it being this far down the line but what's the reason for half of Yorkshire being swallowed up by Derbyshire. Nothing against Derbyshire, it's a lovely place, but it's only about a third the size of Yorkshire whereas on your map it's about twice as big as Yorkshire.
Are you supporting the House of Lancaster by any chance?
no...in reality yorkshire and lancanshire would be touching...thus making it easier to hold the two houses...so i wanted to split them up a bit...for gameplay purposes.
bspride wrote:walnutwatson wrote:The map is looking great. I'm sure there's some reason with it being this far down the line but what's the reason for half of Yorkshire being swallowed up by Derbyshire. Nothing against Derbyshire, it's a lovely place, but it's only about a third the size of Yorkshire whereas on your map it's about twice as big as Yorkshire.
Are you supporting the House of Lancaster by any chance?
no...in reality yorkshire and lancanshire would be touching...thus making it easier to hold the two houses...so i wanted to split them up a bit...for gameplay purposes.
drake_259 wrote:i like the writing but it think it need to be changed a bit, its a bit hard too read
MrBenn wrote:bspride wrote:walnutwatson wrote:The map is looking great. I'm sure there's some reason with it being this far down the line but what's the reason for half of Yorkshire being swallowed up by Derbyshire. Nothing against Derbyshire, it's a lovely place, but it's only about a third the size of Yorkshire whereas on your map it's about twice as big as Yorkshire.
Are you supporting the House of Lancaster by any chance?
no...in reality yorkshire and lancanshire would be touching...thus making it easier to hold the two houses...so i wanted to split them up a bit...for gameplay purposes.
I would support geographical accuracy, although I still think that some thought needs to go into the gameplay; the North is a much better place to start than the South - can you think of some ways to address this imbalance?
e_i_pi wrote:Looking great bspride. Graphically, may I suggest having a slight drop-shadow around the edge of the paper, as it looks a little static against the woodgrain.
MrBenn wrote:I still think that some thought needs to go into the gameplay; the North is a much better place to start than the South - can you think of some ways to address this imbalance?
mibi wrote:First of all, what is that sans doing in there? The aliasing on the text is too harsh, try smooth. The continent borders are not prominent enough. The uniformity of the territory bothers me too. Learn to bend it, place the text on a path and don't be afraid to hyphenate. There could be more color too, the dark ages weren't all that drab. Also the title deserves some extra attention, it looks like an after though. The battle icon is too faint and the docks need serious work. The country as a whole could be smaller to give you more room for other elements. Why are the rivers grey?
i like the compass though.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
sailorseal wrote:Could you define the borders more they are difficult to make out, I like the texture you have going but I think you have overused it, its hard to see most details maybe lighten up a little.
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users