Moderator: Community Team
blakebowling wrote:Dualta wrote:Excellent updates for sure. The scoreboard is very impressive. Can someone explain to me, however, how the lower profile range score is calculated, please? I'm assuming the higher score is the highest score ever achieved, but I'm not sure how to read the lower score.
Thanks in advance
It's the minimum and max score since 9/19/2013.
bigWham wrote:
Each month players will compete to be both the Monthly Leader and Most Improved, with great Medals and Conquer Credit prizes for the Top 10 in each category. This implements the spirit of a Suggestion originally made by Qwert.
josko.ri wrote:At the moment, my minimum is higher than everyone else's maximum, I think that achievement deserves a medal![]()
Dualta wrote:Excellent updates for sure. The scoreboard is very impressive. Can someone explain to me, however, how the lower profile range score is calculated, please? I'm assuming the higher score is the highest score ever achieved, but I'm not sure how to read the lower score.
Thanks in advance
blakebowling wrote:Dualta wrote:Excellent updates for sure. The scoreboard is very impressive. Can someone explain to me, however, how the lower profile range score is calculated, please? I'm assuming the higher score is the highest score ever achieved, but I'm not sure how to read the lower score.
Thanks in advance
It's the minimum and max score since 9/19/2013.
blakebowling wrote:Dualta wrote:Excellent updates for sure. The scoreboard is very impressive. Can someone explain to me, however, how the lower profile range score is calculated, please? I'm assuming the higher score is the highest score ever achieved, but I'm not sure how to read the lower score.
Thanks in advance
It's the minimum and max score since 9/19/2013.
Teflon Kris wrote:bigWham wrote:
Each month players will compete to be both the Monthly Leader and Most Improved, with great Medals and Conquer Credit prizes for the Top 10 in each category. This implements the spirit of a Suggestion originally made by Qwert.
Medals ???
Teflon Kris wrote:Teflon Kris wrote:bigWham wrote:
Each month players will compete to be both the Monthly Leader and Most Improved, with great Medals and Conquer Credit prizes for the Top 10 in each category. This implements the spirit of a Suggestion originally made by Qwert.
Medals ???
General Roy wrote:blakebowling wrote:Dualta wrote:Excellent updates for sure. The scoreboard is very impressive. Can someone explain to me, however, how the lower profile range score is calculated, please? I'm assuming the higher score is the highest score ever achieved, but I'm not sure how to read the lower score.
Thanks in advance
It's the minimum and max score since 9/19/2013.
What do you call the 19th month of the year?
EagleofGreenErth wrote:Just curious.... noticed some players have "been awarded more than 30 medals for things such as tournament contribution and such. Their image still shows "XXX" but I think they are getting more than 30 to their medal count. Whats up with medals past 30 for people?
EagleofGreenErth wrote:Just curious.... noticed some players have "been awarded more than 30 medals for things such as tournament contribution and such. Their image still shows "XXX" but I think they are getting more than 30 to their medal count. Whats up with medals past 30 for people?
betiko wrote:And about that; can you explain the challenge medals? Is this going to be based on the scoreboards stuff, or will it be specific challenges like doomyoshi started running this year?
Vlasov wrote:Is Saxibot any smarter than the first two bots? Oh, I'm not sure... depends on the map, maybe? Who designed the AI for these CC bots?
You guys should enable games against multiple bots, as done at http://www.victorsunited.com... if you have enough artificial intelligence code. Multiple bots tend to kill each other off before attacking a Human, at that site.... but it's always a challenge.
Qwert wrote:well i must say that i dont give applause to lackattack and el jefe,,but bigwham deserve applause.
So far he show quite big enthusiasm, and hes implementations its so fast, that this its one big positive move
lackattack wrote:Qwert wrote:well i must say that i dont give applause to lackattack and el jefe,,but bigwham deserve applause.
So far he show quite big enthusiasm, and hes implementations its so fast, that this its one big positive move
I have to agree with you Qwert, bigwham is making me look bad...
... and it is really nice to see. Well done !!!![]()
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users