Moderator: Community Team
What's the point of feedback if you can't say anything about why you left that feedback?
DukeToshiro wrote:I just left ratings for some people, but there was no space to leave a comment in. What's the point of feedback if you can't say anything about why you left that feedback?
Also, what happened to all of the old feedback we received? I'd hate to think that all of that leaving and receiving of feedback was just thrown out the window.
AndyDufresne wrote:What happens to old feedback? Since there is no way to fairly translate feedback into ratings, everyone will start off with a blank rating score. Until the ratings system has matured we'll provide a link to view the old feedback on each member's profile. We'll figure out how to drop feedback for good at a later date, in consultation with the community.
rocky mountain wrote:i just received a pm from admin saying i got my first rating... it doesn't show up in my games, or when i click on it. why?
rocky mountain wrote:do you have to win or complete? and again:rocky mountain wrote:i like it too! but i am still unclear about one thing: how do you leave ratings for people you left feedback for?my games wrote:You can leave ratings for 17 members!
there is nothing to click, so what is it for?
wcaclimbing wrote:I'm getting the "welcome to conquerclub" PMs again, is that normal?admin wrote:Hello wcaclimbing,
Congratulations on completing your second turn! You are getting the hang of it, aren't you? Did you know that you can play up to 4 games at once for free? Why not join a few more games? You'll see more action!
The Conquer Club
This is an automatically generated message. Please do not reply.
I don't want them
Black Baron wrote:what a load of crap, what happens now if u had a list of blocked enemies? they just disappeared????? dont want to play certain people and if this means they can end up in games i get in then i am against this change...
NASATimp wrote:What's the point of feedback if you can't say anything about why you left that feedback?
I agree with the sentiment here. Like (I assume) the above poster, I read through the justification for the new system. However, I feel the new system does not allow enough description, particularly of what specific behaviour earned a poor mark. To borrow from Tolstoy: "Good opponents are all alike; every bad opponent is bad in his own way."
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:there should be a medal to the players who bust the most multis
azezzo wrote:i do not like this new feedback sytem, i want to be able to read the comments why someone is good or bad.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users