New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Archival storage for Announcements. Peruse old Announcements here!

Moderators: Community Team, Global Moderators, Media Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby Jeff Hardy on Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:58 pm

FarangDemon wrote:You can even increase your score to Conqueror. Just assemble a disciplined team and target teams containing cooks and no one ranked Lieutenant or above on Waterloo. If you are good enough at Waterloo you can win risk-free points in 60 out of 60 games. Your point gain is limited only to the number of games you can play.

thats what i did once, played dubs on waterloo...

the first noob was eliminated on round 3
2008-12-31 01:54:58 - Sun Tzup eliminated FarangDemon from the game

the other player put up more of a fight and did quite well but got eliminated round 5
2008-12-31 20:10:05 - Sun Tzup eliminated Americanpigdog from the game

for an easy win
2008-12-31 20:10:05 - Jeff Hardy, Sun Tzup won the game

and some easy points
2008-12-31 20:10:05 - FarangDemon loses 15 points
2008-12-31 20:10:05 - Americanpigdog loses 15 points
2008-12-31 20:10:05 - Jeff Hardy gains 15 points
2008-12-31 20:10:06 - Sun Tzup gains 15 points
Last edited by Jeff Hardy on Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
General Jeff Hardy
 
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:22 am
Location: Matt Hardy's account, you can play against me there
Medals: 17
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby sailorseal on Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:45 pm

Thanks for not locking the thread lack!
User avatar
Cook sailorseal
 
Posts: 2741
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: conquerclub.com
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (7) General Contribution (3)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is wicked awesome!

Postby King_Herpes on Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:54 pm

Thanks for changing the title of the thread lack. Amen brother!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class King_Herpes
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: Red Light District
Medals: 70
Conqueror Achievement (1) Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4)
Terminator Achievement (4) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (5)
General Contribution (1)

Re: New Years Resolution: A.sub is amazing!

Postby a.sub on Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:46 pm

just taking a leaf out of KH's book :lol: nice title lmao
User avatar
Cadet a.sub
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:07 am
Medals: 26
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (6)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby Mr Changsha on Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:45 am

FarangDemon wrote:
freakns wrote:while i agree with most of what youve said, i really failing to see how can someone lose 60 games in a row.


http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=75435

Check out the link I posted above. It explains in detail how in all 60 games containing a particular player on a particular map against teams consisting of at least one cook and nobody Lieutenant or above, the cook team lost every single one of the 60 games.

This shows that high ranked players that target teams containing cooks and no officers on Waterloo are exploiting a harvesting technique whereby they can win every game because their opponents can never win. Sure they would win eventually, given enough games, but they don't win enough to prevent technique from being profitable.

The implication is that harvesting of less skilled players may be possible on many different maps and map restrictions should be imposed to prevent players from exploiting this harvesting technique.

While Lack mentioned that the scoreboard was supposed to measure skill and not the use of harvesting techniques, he did not specifically define harvesting techniques. That is what my sug bug is attempting to do. Define harvesting techniques by looking at how often cook teams actually win against skilled, organized players.


Farangdemon's ideas remind me a lot of New Labour's social policies. Just as the poor (in New Labour's world) cannot be trusted to buy their own council house, or find their own job, or choose where their children go to school, or which hospital they want to be treated in; so our own poor (cooks) cannot be trusted to make their own gaming decisions here on CC. They need to be protected from their own incompetence, protected from the maxatstuy's and King H's of our world for their own good. Heaven forbid we ask our poor to stand on their own two feet! Luckily, Lack obviously has more sense with regards to the lower classes in his world. Here they have every right to get absolutely raped( ;) ) time and time again by some unscrupulous high-ranker if they so desire. Just as the poor man in our societies has the right to throw his benefit check away in a casino week after week after week, so our cooks have the right to throw their points away (the horror!) in game after game on formats they don't slightly understand, or even want to understand. This is the nature of liberty, farangdemon. The liberty to completely waste your life without being sent to re-education camps (cook school), the right to idiotically hand over your wage to bookies because you can't be bothered to think about how to use the money more productively (point inflation), the liberty to quit job after job and therefore sink to the lowest socio-economic status (deadbeat).

Of course, you are merely following the path I said you would. Your social-engineering sort will never be content. You will continue to attempt to corrupt the liberties and freedoms of the people in your endless quest to remake a society in your own image. It is rank egoism. Once farming had been declared 'against the good of society' - which in your mind seems to roughly equate to the landlords exploiting the peasants - we now move on to cooks. But remember that once the landlords were liquidated in China (and I use the term correctly) it was replaced by collectivisation, mass poverty and starvation.

The trouble with the farangdemon's of this world has always been that on the surface they seem so virtuous, honest and good. They want equality, fairness and, most of all, order. Yet one must never be fooled. For every social-engineer is as selfish as any rank capitalist as well as being markedly less honest. He will demand equality in an effort to raise himself beyond the masses, preach fairness as he rigs the system as thoroughly as any fat cat CEO.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Mr Changsha
 
Posts: 1615
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:42 am
Medals: 14
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (3)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby FarangDemon on Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:17 am

I don't really see what these political labels have to do with fixing the scoring system to eliminate farming.

You can rant about politics all you want, but in the end everybody knows that you favor a system where the only way to get to the top is by using harvesting techniques. Why don't you stick to the topic and address this?

Many of you guys keep posting saying the same old arguments:

1. Low skilled players deserve to lose points.

Rebuttal: Nobody says they don't. Rather, the whole community prefers a system where you cannot get to the top by farming. If certain lower skilled players are unable to get farmed as a result of keeping with this community goal, then so be it. Their protection is NOT the reason for the anti-farming countermeasures, but is a by-product of a competitive scoring system that does not allow one to farm their way to the top.

2. Cooks should be able to play any map they want.

Rebuttal: Yes they should. Just make sure that points are not exchanged if historical data show that the map settings and players' skill levels correspond to point harvesting.

3. It is impossible to prevent farming of low skilled players

Rebuttal: Just extend the initial countermeasures that Lack has instituted to prevent farming of Newbies to cover all proven harvesting techniques. Let the data decide.

4. Farangdemon is a whiner for wanting a scoring system where you cannot farm your way to the top.

:lol:
User avatar
Brigadier FarangDemon
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:36 am
Medals: 33
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1)
Tournament Achievement (6) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (4) Map Contribution (1) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby Mr Changsha on Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:38 am

FarangDemon wrote:I don't really see what these political labels have to do with fixing the scoring system to eliminate farming.

You can rant about politics all you want, but in the end everybody knows that you favor a system where the only way to get to the top is by using harvesting techniques. Why don't you stick to the topic and address this?

Many of you guys keep posting saying the same old arguments:

1. Low skilled players deserve to lose points.

Rebuttal: Nobody says they don't. Rather, the whole community prefers a system where you cannot get to the top by farming. If certain lower skilled players are unable to get farmed as a result of keeping with this community goal, then so be it. Their protection is NOT the reason for the anti-farming countermeasures, but is a by-product of a competitive scoring system that does not allow one to farm their way to the top.

2. Cooks should be able to play any map they want.

Rebuttal: Yes they should. Just make sure that points are not exchanged if historical data show that the map settings and players' skill levels correspond to point harvesting.

3. It is impossible to prevent farming of low skilled players

Rebuttal: Just extend the initial countermeasures that Lack has instituted to prevent farming of Newbies to cover all proven harvesting techniques. Let the data decide.

4. Farangdemon is a whiner for wanting a scoring system where you cannot farm your way to the top.

:lol:


Let's consider the defence...

farangdemon wrote:Many of you guys keep posting saying the same old arguments:


No, that would be you. My arguments have been continuously inventive, original and, dare I say it, obviously completely over your head - judging by your last response.

farangdemon wrote:You can rant about politics all you want, but in the end everybody knows that you favor a system where the only way to get to the top is by using harvesting techniques


Have you even read anything I have written on this topic? I sometimes wonder. You know I couldn't care less who is at the top of the table or, for that matter, how they got there. You also know that what concerns me are efforts to limit the kinds of games players can play. That is my real concern. I also believe that your efforts are entirely self-centred. I don't for one minute think you care a fig about the low-ranking players on CC. You care absolutely about your own progression up the leaderboard. That's your concern and you're welcome to it. What truly, absolutely and completely bothers me is that you would be happy to limit other player's enjoyment of the game in your pursuit of, what, the top 50?

Now I am a much more reliable and trustworthy scribe. For one, I have already achieved my objective: to be a large singles games player at the major rank. Unlike you, I can be completely objective about the whole thing for I have no personal interest in being in the top 250. If I could make colonel eventually that would be great, but such an ambition is entirely unrelated to what you, or anyone else, is doing on CC. Secondly, I play low-ranking players all the time as the majority of my games are large, public, singles games. I play everyone and anyone. On that basis, I am well-qualifed to consider whether cooks, cadets or privates (because you can't just stop at cooks once you start down your path) should be playing in my games.

So...

farangdemon wrote:2. Cooks should be able to play any map they want.

Rebuttal: Yes they should. Just make sure that points are not exchanged if historical data show that the map settings and players' skill levels correspond to point harvesting


Glad you agree lower ranks should be able to play maps they like playing. Maybe there is hope for you yet! How about being able to play WHO they want to play? Not sure from your answer, but I'm guessing that's ok too. But they can't lose points? Ah, the poor little deluded lambs. Better get Big Brother to look after them, huh? Let me let you into a secret. I play 2.1 large singles games with no cards. The cooks never win. Not once. The cadets, privates and even corporals are going to be pushed to win 1 in 16, even 1 in 24 on that map and that setting. You wouldn't consider it farming, but it may as well be from the cooks perspective. They always lose. Should they give up their points? If a cook plays 1 on 1 with King H on any map freestyle they'll lose. You know it, he knows it and I know it. They'll just as surely lose if they join an 8 man no card seq. on 2.1. The cook is sure to lose in both, but I'm guessing I would get to keep his points under your system but King_H would not. For the life of me I can't see what the difference is from the cook's perspective. But then I suspect we differ in that I consider this issue from both perspectives. You seem to only think about it in relation to how it will influence the top of the scoreboard.

So, if the cook plays 1 on 1 freestyle he's stuffed. If he plays 8 man no cards or escalating he is just as stuffed, just quicker. If 3 cooks play your triples team then, you guessed it, they're stuffed. Want me to go on?

But they should have the right to jump into a top 8 man escalating game (and I've always respected those boys for keeping them public) and they should take the consequece (5 points) if they lose. They should be able to join King_H, get beat and lose those points too. It is their decision to join the game and THEY MUST take the consequence of doing so. Otherwise, what's the point of them playing at all?
Image
User avatar
Colonel Mr Changsha
 
Posts: 1615
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:42 am
Medals: 14
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (3)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby FarangDemon on Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:35 pm

The majority of the community (this includes people of all ranks) prefers a system where you cannot get to the top by farming. If certain lower skilled players are unable to get farmed as a result of keeping with this community goal, then so be it. Their protection is NOT the reason for the anti-farming countermeasures, but is a by-product of a competitive scoring system that does not allow one to farm their way to the top.

You acknowledge the flaws in the scoring system that promote harvesting techniques. But because you have achieved your own limited, personal score goal, you turn around and demand that everybody else be content with the scoring system, simply because you lack the ambition, confidence or skill to excel further against your peers.

You want players to be able to farm their way to the top. That's why you crap on any suggestion that would curtail farming. Either that, or you have a personal crusade against FarangDemon's posts. Maybe that is why you derive so much pleasure from writing article-length rants about world politics and other unrelated topics in an attempt to demonize the demon instead of addressing your own reasons for defending farming.
User avatar
Brigadier FarangDemon
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:36 am
Medals: 33
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1)
Tournament Achievement (6) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (4) Map Contribution (1) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby Mr Changsha on Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:41 pm

This site currently has 22159 active players and 89 pages of scores. While many seem to consider that page 1 has more importance than say page 30, I don't. There are paying members throughout the scoreboard who should be treated equally by CC and so, therefore, should have the right to play any game they want and win and lose points in any game as well.

Any measures to limit lower ranks gaming options is wrong on this basis.

With regards to my own motivations you can be sure I am not short on gaming confidence, or ability at what I do. One of the great differences between us is simply due to the kinds of games we play. My games are positively enhanced by a mix of abilities, while trips and quads are surely better played when the teams have a roughly comparable level of ability.

I have written before that the ideal solution would be for players to be divided into seperate leagues based on game style. If the majority of your games are trips, you would sit on the teams scoreboard. Maybe it could be divided between freestyle teams and sequential teams as well. Singles players could be divided into large singles players (5 and up) and small sinlges players (2, 3 and 4). However, all ranks must still have the ability to join (and learn!) from any game they so choose. To give you an example, say I asked KingH to teach me 1 on 1 freestyle over 30 games on his 5 best maps. He would probably win almost all of them. Some would say I was point dropping, others would say simply cheating to artifically inflate my pal King H's score. They might well be right. But MAYBE I really just wanted to learn how to play 1 on 1 freestyle from a top player?

So to conclude:

1. Yes, the scorebord is a joke. We all know this. However, suggestions should not be implemented that limit players enjoyment to try and tweak a scoreboard that, by its very conception, is junk.

2. Therefore, the scoreboard should be divided. Why this hasn't been done already is beyond me.

3. I have been known to write with an eye to the style of writing. However, there is usually a serious point in there somewhere and sometimes it is even CC related!

4. I'm picking on you because you write well and sensibly, farangdemon. I can't be bothered to debate with idiots.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Mr Changsha
 
Posts: 1615
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:42 am
Medals: 14
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (3)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby Sun Tzup on Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:05 am

I think I see the arguments here.

Farangdemon: we should have a rating system that has the most skilled players moving up to the top as opposed to the players who most carefully join only games they know they will win based upon their opponents being bad, unskilled, disorganized or ignorant. Right now our system rates people in such a way as to reward a technique of playing a whole bunch of low skill players and beating them more than it rewards playing highly skilled players and beating them. If one wants to be king they must play team games against n00bs or they will make enough points to stay high in the rankings.

solution proffered: outlaw the practice of farming.

My suggestion to accomplish the end goal of farangdemons would be to have a rating difference cap on speed games or something where a guy can only play people within a range of say 1000 points. This would keep players of relatively the same skill level playing each other. Obviously this would be met with outrage and not really work well because it would be a nightmare to hunt down players of the same ranking as you to play against. as we all want to play that would suck with such a small CC community.

I dont have a solution but I agree that it sucks that to be at the top you need to play less games and the games you play become the strategy to the top. specialization and the exclusion of learning new maps or playing sequential games or multiplayer games etc as well as farming are the only way to stay brig and go up. It even becomes pointless to play in tournaments. so many of our "best players" refuse to play in tourneys unless its a colonel and above only tourney or something like that. It would be nice to be able to play everyone without then having the excuse of "your rating is too low" imo.

The argument against:

Look this is a place where we come to play risk. regulations will just result in a morass of bull which will end up causing more problems than it solves. Farming is part of the way this site is set up and played. deal with it or go home.

My .02 is that although this might be generally true a real problem is being pointed out and should be addressed. Dont attack the messenger just address the issue he brings up. How can we make it so that rank becomes a better measure of strategic acumen and all around skill as opposed to who can most effectively farm n00bs and cherry pick their games and rely on their strengths? I dont think a rule against farming is the answer as its too arbitrary to judge and when you start grey lining people will go apeshit. There might be perhaps that you dont gain any points from someone who is more than 1000 points below you or something like that. That would change everything. maybe 2000? to be safe. that would change eeeeverything. farming wouldnt exist anymore. just an idea.
Private 1st Class Sun Tzup
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:49 pm
Medals: 35
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (1)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby Artimis on Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:50 am

Mr Changsha,

I think multiple scoreboards would be a good idea, especially considering how many different game types that are available that all require a different approach to achieve success. As in Diablo 2, multiple score boards allow players that excel at one approach to the game to be recognised for their achievements. I suspect this may already have been put forward in Sugs & Bugs, perhaps one of us could resurrect the appropriate thread?

FarangDemon,

I side with Mr Changsha on not implementing changes that would limit a players freedom of choice(especially a paying customer!) to pick and choose maps at their discretion. That's why I'm not keen on extending map restrictions to Cooks, because periodically I end up de-ranking when I join a bunch of games on a new map. I don't see why I or other players like me should be forced to mind our scores just so as to continue playing on maps we like. So maybe another approach is needed?
==================================================
This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.

Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
User avatar
Major Artimis
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:09 am
Location: Right behind ya!!! >:D
Medals: 33
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby Sun Tzup on Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:01 am

multiple scoreboards seems a fair way to address the problem. We could have a farmers board, a multi map board, 8 man 7 man etc. what would the boards be and where would we draw the line?
Private 1st Class Sun Tzup
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:49 pm
Medals: 35
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (1)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby x_lord_of_war_x on Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:55 am

I agree with lack on this, people dont like losing so therefore it could really affect his buisness, but i think that those who take offense to this are probably the ones doing it...There are ways to fix this and my suggestion would be to make it where only people within a certain rank can play games vs provisional status members...this would possibly stop the problem...Ive started multi player games before & ended up winning because of deadbeats but that was never my intention because you risk losing more points to a lower rank then you would vs a higher rank...To be more specific I suggest that only members ranked sergeant 1st class & under can play against provisional status members in 1v1 games..
Cook x_lord_of_war_x
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: Tennessee, United States
Medals: 7
Standard Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby Incandenza on Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:08 pm

Mr Changsha, even though I'm pretty sure it's not biologically possible outside of third-rate Governator movies, I want to have your babies. Seriously, your last few posts in this thread have been absolutely world-class.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (6) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (8)
General Contribution (4)

Re: New Years Resolution: Newbie Farming is not Cool.

Postby sailorseal on Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:31 pm

Incandenza wrote:Mr Changsha, even though I'm pretty sure it's not biologically possible outside of third-rate Governator movies, I want to have your babies. Seriously, your last few posts in this thread have been absolutely world-class.

WOW
User avatar
Cook sailorseal
 
Posts: 2741
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: conquerclub.com
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (7) General Contribution (3)

PreviousNext

Return to Announcement Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Login