by cairnswk on Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:05 pm
Version 8..
cairnswk wrote:chapcrap wrote:cairnswk wrote:Gillipig wrote:Great to see this map get a stamp! The lake Parramatta seems quite pointless though if you don't mind I say that

. It doesn't act as an impassable nor is it a region so maybe it should go!?
Can do, next version

I don't see why. It doesn't get in the way of anything. It's less point less that the roadways in the north.
I would prefer to remove the lake over removing the road

Lake removed...
AndyDufresne wrote:It has been a while since I've given this map a once over. I think the only thing that sticks out when I gave it look, was that the numbers in the bonus legend might be better off not colored, so they can stand out a little more.
--Andy
With this new version, do you still feel this way?
chapcrap wrote:...
Or not have the boxes around the numbers...
And are you still inclined with this chapcrap?
pamoa wrote:cairnswk as usual = great
legend order suggestion to respect some usual reading order
+3 NW Highlands
+4 Lower Blue Mtns
+3 Upper Blue Mtns
+2 BM National Park
Central Coast +2 . Hills District +5 . National Parks +4 . North Shore +4 . N'n Beaches +4 . Sydney +1
Western Plains +4 . Mid-west +5 . SE Suburbs +4 . Eastern Suburbs +2 . S'n Highlands +5 . S'n Beaches +2
pamoa...sorry, but with possibly ( i haven't had the size approved yet) new room, i found a better way to re-organise the legend...classic style... left to right - top to bottom...thanks for the incentive to examine this aspect again though.
I like the new shape, but i don't know if any new size policy will permit it.
Is there any discussion on gameplay, anyone?
