Moderator: Tournament Directors
Dukasaur wrote:I always thought 216 was ambitious, 150 seems more do-able.
However, instead of switching to 5-player games (many people prefer 6-player Classic over 5-player Classic) why not change the format slightly, so not all losers are eliminated?
For instance:
First round, with 150 players and 6-player games, 30 winners advance automatically to Round 2.
From the losers, 6 names are randomly drawn to also advance, so you have 36 players entering round 2 and you again have 6 X 6-player games.
The Conquer Cup went through a very similar downsizing, and there were a LOT of complaints. Many people have built strategies for 6-player on this map and HATE having the two neutrals in there.
(Not that you don't have to worry about me. I'm in no matter how you do it. I was just giving advice.)
larsbanger101 wrote:im out
ElricTheGreat wrote:Well ... anyone who had missed the 2 rounds of invites are now gone ... hope those who have been holding on enjoy their 1st round battles
Good luck everyone !!!
See you in the finals !!!
BTW for the record I am not too impressed with all of the players who signed up, let the games get started and then have to chase them to get started ... it would have been very easy for you guys to just post requesting to be removed. There is enough work to do to get a tourney this size up and running without the extra activities you are putting the organizer through. Please consider that when signing up for any other events .. the events go much better with the help and support of the entire group.
Lestat1779 wrote:ELRIC, THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK PUTTING THIS TOURNEY TOGETHER!!
how do you take a topic off your list of topics when you're finished with it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users