Moderator: Tournament Directors
Gilligan wrote:Any word on when the next round starts?
Woodruff wrote:Hey folks, if you're interested in another tournament similar to this one, I've started another (with 64 players this time!). Go to the "Join A Game" forum and look it up under "An Evolutionary Tournament".
Gilligan wrote:Gilligan beats Mustapha Mond in Game 4185629
GeneralAnestetic wrote:the most unbalanced start ever:
game 4241517
sure, go first with a 5-army bonus...
that's fair
GeneralAnestetic wrote:and how is it i'm playing someone who's already played 5 rounds?
i can't possibly imagine how the bracket works that pits someone who's played 3 rounds versus someone who's played 5 rounds...
GeneralAnestetic wrote:the most unbalanced start ever:
game 4241517
sure, go first with a 5-army bonus...
that's fair
GeneralAnestetic wrote:the bracketing for this tournament makes no sense at all.
there's a guy who's played 10 matches & a guy who's played 3 and both are still active.
won't play this style again.
GeneralAnestetic wrote:a) it's not whining.
2) the structure doesn't make sense because it doesn't reward success. a player who wins ten matches could lose out to a player who's only won 1 prior match. i'm all for triple elimination, but not in a format that is unbalanced.
Funkelee wrote:Sooo.....what if someone were to play to the end of a bracket, lose, start over, play to end of next and lose, then play up from bottom again and win out. Would they not most likely have the winningest percentage, and have one the whole thing, therby getting two years of premium(in your Evo tourney II)? Or would that not be possible?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users