Moderator: Tournament Directors
Godd wrote:Re: Should we crown an "Era Champion" at the end of a certain number of games?
Form what it looks like you could have several Era Champion's so would it be in more of a line of a "Hall of Fame for Era Champion's"?
Optimus Prime wrote:Godd wrote:Re: Should we crown an "Era Champion" at the end of a certain number of games?
Form what it looks like you could have several Era Champion's so would it be in more of a line of a "Hall of Fame for Era Champion's"?
Yes, there would be a new Era Champion at the completion of each "Era of Games", and I would keep a hall of champions in the thread somewhere.
BaldAdonis wrote:So what's that make, 16 for each? Shall we compromise and go for 18, or are odd numbers crucial?
You will be in soon, don't worry. You just need to hope that the first set of three games finishes sometime soon. I will be expanding by 6-12 players with the second set of games due to the high number on the waiting list.negoeien wrote:Got an advice too.
Expand the list of acive players and let me join .
Seriously this leaugue is made for me and i would definately be one of the better ones
No sarcasm
Got a bet for you optimus . If I win batlle for middle earth I'm directly in.
Is that a deal?
Regards
and you host so many god tourneys I'm amazed.
barterer2002 wrote:Yeah 21 games at a time was a lot to add on top of everything else. I think we're down to about 12 games left in that one there Kinnison.
Gozar wrote:So far so good, competition is pretty fierce in my games.
How about some escalating cards in the future?
negoeien wrote:Oh nice!! Expand the list please !!!
BaldAdonis wrote:negoeien wrote:Oh nice!! Expand the list please !!!
Forget that. When do we get to decide on 8 player games?
Optimus Prime wrote:BaldAdonis wrote:negoeien wrote:Oh nice!! Expand the list please !!!
Forget that. When do we get to decide on 8 player games?
Find me a number that is divisible by both 6 and 8, and I'll tell you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users