Moderator: Community Team
Donlarry wrote:lets get rid of the dice program and just use regular math
dice should not be determining the outcome of the game
its like they should put my record against people and my record vs the dice cuz i got to play them in everygame
if u go home and play monopoly the dice dont feel like these dice ive played c-lo craps everything
these computer dice r just made up to be bad so can we change them finally half the member want them more fair
so what up with that
TheForgivenOne wrote:Donlarry wrote:lets get rid of the dice program and just use regular math
dice should not be determining the outcome of the game
its like they should put my record against people and my record vs the dice cuz i got to play them in everygame
if u go home and play monopoly the dice dont feel like these dice ive played c-lo craps everything
these computer dice r just made up to be bad so can we change them finally half the member want them more fair
so what up with that
I do Play monopoly at home quite a bit, seems like at critical moments of the game, I land on a hotel. THOSE DICE MUST BE BROKEN
sachni wrote:the dice are not 'natural' and do work in patterns of losing and winning, the problem here is that strategy and skill play a back seat to the programing priorities and these alone determine game outcomes. proof cannot be given by players but these patterns can be observed by any independent individual over periods of play which is why i won't maintain premium membership ... the dice issue is not mine as a player to fix and though i wish i could suggest an alternate program this is beyond me. i find your denial of the issue insulting more-over, fix the dice issue so that skill and strategy have a chance to impact on game outcomes and i would purchase premium membership immediately as i do really like these games.
sachni wrote:odds are called chance and data within the category of maths, odds are not a separate entity mybad ...
Frogmanx82 wrote:I really would like the no dice option. I played with a group of guys for years and we always played no dice. Its a straight one for one. So the attacker needs at least 2 more than the defender to cover the territories after the attack. This puts the emphasis on position and strategy instead of dumb luck. I can't believe the ignorant comments in this thread made by people who have never tried it. It will work on any map and I have to think the code for a straight up one for one troop reduction wouldn't be that hard. Trust me, try it and you'll like it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users