Rank Restricted Games

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

Re: Player Rank/Score Filter Option in Game Finder

Postby Qwert on Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:48 pm

Woodruff wrote:
qwert wrote:its search option, and you can not segregate low -high ranks.
So this could be implemented, in some time period, maybe for 3-4 years?


3-4 years - what's your rush?


silly me #-o
Sometime im dont have patiente to waith 5-6 years,and demand that thing go faster :-$
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9193
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Medals: 77
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)
Training Achievement (2) Map Contribution (8) Tournament Contribution (22) General Contribution (4)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby agentcom on Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:28 am

Topics MERGED

There will be much more to come ...
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby Woodruff on Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:31 am

agentcom wrote:Topics MERGED

There will be much more to come ...


Um...I'm confused. Why was this merged out of the blue? The last post-date tells me It's a rather old thread.

Is this just a tease, because this really should be implemented in some fashion.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4944
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby agentcom on Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:42 am

I am in the process of stickying a couple of threads that are the more common rejected suggestions. I wanted to find the oldest one that I could find, and sure enough, there was a version of this suggestion from way back in 2006. I doubt I'll work all the way back from there, but I will be putting some of the more recent ones in here.

Personally, I'm not against the idea of this suggestion in some form. But as it stands now, it appears that there's no chance of it being implemented after 6 years of being rejected.
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby agentcom on Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:50 pm

Several suggestions MERGED and the introductory post has been added to significantly.
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby Woodruff on Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:21 pm

Can we get it out of the REJECTED area then, please?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4944
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby agentcom on Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:51 pm

Woodruff wrote:Can we get it out of the REJECTED area then, please?


Please read the introductory post.
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby Woodruff on Mon Jul 30, 2012 3:18 am

agentcom wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Can we get it out of the REJECTED area then, please?


Please read the introductory post.


I have. So there is no chance, based on the mass of C&A cases that this would actually relieve, for this to be accepted as a suggestion in some form? The idea that it will create rank segregation or somehow leave people with few too games or opponents to choose from (if done properly) has been thoroughly debunked.

This would be a tremendous boon to the C&A mods.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4944
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby agentcom on Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:09 pm

Woodruff wrote:
agentcom wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Can we get it out of the REJECTED area then, please?


Please read the introductory post.


I have. So there is no chance, based on the mass of C&A cases that this would actually relieve, for this to be accepted as a suggestion in some form? The idea that it will create rank segregation or somehow leave people with few too games or opponents to choose from (if done properly) has been thoroughly debunked.

This would be a tremendous boon to the C&A mods.


It is my understanding that lack has been against this idea from the start. You can see (in the edited OP) that he was against it 6 years ago, and I have no reason to believe that he has changed his mind. I believe that while I was merging these that I read through all 39 pages of this topic. I do not recall the "idea that it will create rank segregation or somehow leave people with too few games" being "thoroughly debunked." I'm not really sure how it could be debunked ... I'm not sure how you would even test that. I recognize that the proposition can't be proven either, but I don't think you can call it debunked.

As far as C&A cases go, the only ones that I see this helping are the ones where someone says "I can't control who joins my games." That's not an insignificant amount of cases, but the high profile farming cases of late have not been about this. Also, what if someone sets up games that only allow cooks through cadets to join? You'd have a whole new type of C&A case. If you implement the suggestion, so that can't be done, then you have to figure out where to draw the line. What if a high ranking officer sets up games with complicated settings, but only opens them for the levels right below officer? Would that be considered abuse?

The basic suggestion suffers from potential for abuse and potential for rank segregation. More complicated versions suffer from their own complexity and the potential for unintended consequences and new forms of abuse.

This suggestion is in rejected because in 6 years there is no indication that the owner of the website wants to do this, but also because his underlying concerns arguably have some validity. Unless there is some sort of sea change, that's where it's going to stay.

Personally, I've come out in favor of this idea. I don't really care too much about it (as in there are numerous other things I'd rather see coded in). But I understand the counterarguments, and I understand that the powers that be don't want this. As a moderator I'm basically just filing this in its appropriate place. So unless I'm told to do otherwise, this is where it will stay.
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Games with minimum score players

Postby CaptainMoo on Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:03 pm

Concise description:
    Games with minimum score players

Specifics/Details:
    Forums exist, made by members to allow players with scores of 1800+ 2000+ 2500+ etc to create games amongst similar ranked players so CC should take note of this and provide the option which is clearly wanted by the players

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
  • I dont think this will be exclusion but will benefit the site. Players can play similar skilled players and progress to the next "tier" if good enough. Its quite frustrating when you do start to climb up the ranks, make a game and loads of lower ranked players join, especially when they just give up, suicide into a particular player, ruin the game for all. With this option implemented it will allow players to play similar levels easier and improve the whole experience. also as it will be an option players can still have a fully open match if they wish and are not points foucsed, just enjoy the game. I think this is a no brainer and is clearly something a lot of users want hence the popular forums for it. With it made as an opyion too it prevents abuse as well and keeps the CC community happier all round
http://www.moo-directory.com
Is your website listed yet?
Free, Reciprocal and Strong One Way Links.
Part of the http://www.cozy-digital.co.uk Group
User avatar
Sergeant CaptainMoo
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Medals: 51
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Games with minimum score players

Postby agentcom on Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:21 pm

Congratulations. You're the first person to have ever thought of this!

Oh wait ...

MERGED and REJECTED
Image
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby CaptainMoo on Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:13 pm

sorry did search, must have missed it

though - " What if a high ranking officer sets up games with complicated settings, but only opens them for the levels right below officer? Would that be considered abuse? "

This is not what i suggested. I was suggsting that if i have a rank of say 1800 then because i have attained that level then i can make a 1800 + only game. thus eliminating the possible abuse / farming above...My point was i dont want low levels joining my games as quite often their stupid play ruins it for the rest and this is why the their is a forum area dedicated to these type s of organised games.......also the objection quoted there already exists as thats what lots of top ranked players prey on
http://www.moo-directory.com
Is your website listed yet?
Free, Reciprocal and Strong One Way Links.
Part of the http://www.cozy-digital.co.uk Group
User avatar
Sergeant CaptainMoo
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:17 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Medals: 51
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby agentcom on Wed Aug 15, 2012 6:24 pm

CaptainMoo wrote:sorry did search, must have missed it

though - " What if a high ranking officer sets up games with complicated settings, but only opens them for the levels right below officer? Would that be considered abuse? "

This is not what i suggested. I was suggsting that if i have a rank of say 1800 then because i have attained that level then i can make a 1800 + only game. thus eliminating the possible abuse / farming above...My point was i dont want low levels joining my games as quite often their stupid play ruins it for the rest and this is why the their is a forum area dedicated to these type s of organised games.......also the objection quoted there already exists as thats what lots of top ranked players prey on


That is one sentence of a 39 page topic. Officer only, Officer mess, enlisted only, etc. game options are also lumped in here along with the ones that are based on points like 1800+. Ranks are based on points, so it's just another way of saying the same thing.
Image
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby donkeymile on Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:32 pm

It's ridiculous that this suggestion isn't being taken seriously - and where's Lack with a reason why this wouldn't benefit the site?

That's all I have - just shaking my head at this.
User avatar
Captain donkeymile
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:10 pm
Medals: 23
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby Campin_Killer on Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:38 pm

donkeymile wrote:It's ridiculous that this suggestion isn't being taken seriously - and where's Lack with a reason why this wouldn't benefit the site?

That's all I have - just shaking my head at this.


You wouldn't have an excuse if you were caught farming...

But, you know, suggestions forum is becoming like the foundry before the strike
Upcoming Tournaments
NCAA Football
In the Trenches - 3 in sign-ups
13 Colonies
8 Thoughts
Africa

Highscore
Image

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Campin_Killer
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:47 pm
Medals: 6
Standard Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (1)

blinking

Postby Sawdust91 on Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:53 pm

My idea is short and sweet, I find it really annoying when some cook with 130 points joins my game, i mean like what the hell if this guy wins its alot of points gone, so my idea is to have "blinking" which gives a player the option to "blink" out people with a rank, e.g. if i was a conqeror i could "blink" out captains or under (giving a 5 rank radius down, which can be altered to 6 or 7 or 8 if that person wishes) so if i was a captain i could be blinked out only by conquerors but i can blink out the rank 5 below me, this way it avoids high ranked people getting farmed, but this option should only be able to be used for 1v1 games (to avoid team games and games where 2 friends might want to play together being ruined)

overall to be honest i think its a good idea, you might not agree with me or you might agree with me, there's no point in telling me that it was pointless making this post, or something like that, i will most likely not look at this again as i will probably forget about it (hehe) lets see what happens anyway, it would definately be handy
Captain Sawdust91
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:54 am
Medals: 20
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1)

Re: blinking

Postby chapcrap on Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:34 pm

Sawdust91 wrote:My idea is short and sweet, I find it really annoying when some cook with 130 points joins my game, i mean like what the hell if this guy wins its alot of points gone, so my idea is to have "blinking" which gives a player the option to "blink" out people with a rank, e.g. if i was a conqeror i could "blink" out captains or under (giving a 5 rank radius down, which can be altered to 6 or 7 or 8 if that person wishes) so if i was a captain i could be blinked out only by conquerors but i can blink out the rank 5 below me, this way it avoids high ranked people getting farmed, but this option should only be able to be used for 1v1 games (to avoid team games and games where 2 friends might want to play together being ruined)

overall to be honest i think its a good idea, you might not agree with me or you might agree with me, there's no point in telling me that it was pointless making this post, or something like that, i will most likely not look at this again as i will probably forget about it (hehe) lets see what happens anyway, it would definately be handy

MERGED another.
Image
User avatar
Major chapcrap
 
Posts: 9579
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City
Medals: 167
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (16) Training Achievement (6) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (34)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby chapcrap on Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:22 pm

chapcrap wrote:MERGED another.


+1
Image
User avatar
Major chapcrap
 
Posts: 9579
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City
Medals: 167
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (16) Training Achievement (6) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (34)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby agentcom on Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:56 pm

Did you just "+1" your own merge? :roll: :lol:
Image
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)

Game with a minimum of point for each player

Postby BENCLUB on Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:26 pm

Hi all

Sorry, my english is too bad to write an introduction and an conclusion of suggestion.

It will be nice to start a game if with people who have a minimum if x points.

Because when you have 1800 points, you really don't want to have people with less than 1500 points in your game.

So please add an option :

"Minimum points to join your game : [x]....... [x][NONE]"

Thank you so much
User avatar
Major BENCLUB
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:52 am
Location: Lyon in FRANCE
Medals: 44
Monthly Leader Gold (1) Most Improved Silver (1) Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2)
Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (2) Battle Royale Achievement (1)
Tournament Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (4)

Re: Game with a minimum of point for each player

Postby TheSaxlad on Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:33 pm

Been Suggested, Been Rejected, Never going to happen really... (due to fair game rules set by the admin)

Sorry.
Image Caution: playing team games with TheSaxlad can lead to shortness of breath, high blood pressure and other-stress related illnesses!

Visit CC on Facebook and Twitter!
User avatar
Lieutenant TheSaxlad
 
Posts: 1508
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:42 am
Location: ShakeyCat's Saxland :)
Medals: 51
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (3)

Re: Game with a minimum of point for each player

Postby nicestash on Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:47 pm

However, there is a place where you can set up private games with a minimum points per player.
There's no 1500 points, but here's the one for 1600 points: https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=47572
Major nicestash
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (7) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (2)
Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby agentcom on Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:01 pm

Another topic MERGED. Please search before posting.
Image
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (13) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (8) General Contribution (2)


Option to select which Ranks can enter your Speed Game

Postby nietzsche on Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:50 pm

Concise description:
Option to select which Ranks can enter your Speed Game

Specifics/Details:
Select by Minimum rank and Maximum rank.

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

I believe one of the reasons for the decline in the number of speed games available at most times of the day is due to the fact that high ranked players who play mostly casual have been bitten in the ass in the past, losing to lowed ranked players.

I'm aware this has been discussed in the past, but imagine this: Lots of high ranked players wishing to play a 1vs1, waiting behind the fence to join a speed game, but no one wants to start a game because it will be joined by player that has skill but has a low rank at the moment.

If you could put those high ranks behind the fence to play together, whats the harm? The "shoutbox" suggestion was not implemented either, it could serve the purpose also.

This could also serve low ranks, who feel comfortable in games playing with guys with the same skill.


Before you reject and archive this, give it a little bit of thought, not everybody thinks like you you know.

And look at speed games, look at how many games high rank start and play, but discount the freestylers, they don't care about rank, they are all about the speed.
Image

Image
User avatar
Major nietzsche
 
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown
Medals: 40
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (2)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Contribution (1)

PreviousNext

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Login