[GO] [Rules] Rank Restricted Games

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

Re: Increasing competition, lower ranks.

Postby greenoaks on Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:27 am

i think it is awesome someone who does not play any games here knows how to fix CC.
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9997
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am
Medals: 138
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (30) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (14)
Tournament Contribution (34) General Contribution (4)

Re: Increasing competition, lower ranks.

Postby DoomYoshi on Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:06 am

greenoaks wrote:i think it is awesome someone who does not play any games here knows how to fix CC.


To whom are you referring?
What would Wolverine do?
He'd team up with a teenage girl and go kill bad guys.
User avatar
Lieutenant DoomYoshi
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 4958
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Termina Field
Medals: 73
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (8) Clan Achievement (16)
Tournament Contribution (6) General Contribution (5)

Re: Increasing competition, lower ranks.

Postby greenoaks on Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:08 am

DoomYoshi wrote:
greenoaks wrote:i think it is awesome someone who does not play any games here knows how to fix CC.


To whom are you referring?

Player, scroll up. it is her thread.
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9997
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am
Medals: 138
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (30) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (14)
Tournament Contribution (34) General Contribution (4)

Re: Increasing competition, lower ranks.

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:04 pm

Jdsizzleslice wrote:Here is a stat for you. Think about it. What % of people with 2000 points or more JOIN games with people with 1400 or less?

Now take that % and ask this question, what % of those people who do JOIN games actually consistently play those games? Whenever I play Speed games, I am constantly looking for Freestyle games. I love Freestyle games, and this would hamper my ability to do so.

So you're saying if a Corporeal creates a 6 person Feudal War game, that only people 1999 and below can join? That's ABSURD! It's basically telling me what games I can/cannot play.

You have it backwards. You would be able to join any game you wish, but you can prohibit higher ranks from joining your games if you wish.

Also, it is NOT mandatory, it would be an option.

And, as to who in the upper ranks joins lower rank games.. basically any farmer, and a few other decent folks. I would play higher ranked people, particularly in the more unusual maps frequently.
Corporal 1st Class PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4)
Training Achievement (1)

Re: Increasing competition, lower ranks.

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:08 pm

greenoaks wrote:i think it is awesome someone who does not play any games here knows how to fix CC.


try again.... lol, played over 10,000 games here.
Corporal 1st Class PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4)
Training Achievement (1)

Re: Increasing competition, lower ranks.

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:12 pm

DoomYoshi wrote:I can agree with Patrick's point. My map rank stats show - I am incredible at Stalingrad, Jamaica, Poker Club, Hive, Treasures of Galapagos; which are highly specialized maps. However, I am not so good at large maps like NYC, which keeps my points down. I usually feel like quitting CC anytime I get a NYC game, so if you want free points, come play me.

This would create a big hamper for the map microcommunities. Why should there be a schism for us Hive-trenchers?


This is NOT MANDATORY. It is merely an option.

I, too, play variety maps more than the "standards". All this would do is allow lower ranks to specify whether they wanted upper ranks to join or not.. and ONLY if they stay low rank. If you "bounce around" the scoreboard, then it would not apply.

Basically, this would not do much for someone like you. The people it would help are many of those who wind up disgusted and leave because they don't want to get slaughtered constantly and don't want to devote the time to SOC or something similar.
Corporal 1st Class PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4)
Training Achievement (1)

Re: Increasing competition, lower ranks.

Postby patrickaa317 on Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:03 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
DoomYoshi wrote:I can agree with Patrick's point. My map rank stats show - I am incredible at Stalingrad, Jamaica, Poker Club, Hive, Treasures of Galapagos; which are highly specialized maps. However, I am not so good at large maps like NYC, which keeps my points down. I usually feel like quitting CC anytime I get a NYC game, so if you want free points, come play me.

This would create a big hamper for the map microcommunities. Why should there be a schism for us Hive-trenchers?


This is NOT MANDATORY. It is merely an option.

I, too, play variety maps more than the "standards". All this would do is allow lower ranks to specify whether they wanted upper ranks to join or not.. and ONLY if they stay low rank. If you "bounce around" the scoreboard, then it would not apply.

Basically, this would not do much for someone like you. The people it would help are many of those who wind up disgusted and leave because they don't want to get slaughtered constantly and don't want to devote the time to SOC or something similar.


If someone gets slaughtered constantly in this game, they should realize either to play less complicated maps or to revise their strategy. Noone with half a decent amount of strategy should continue to get slaughtered on maps like classic, if you do, then this site is simply not for you. Allowing people to limit on ranks won't fix this. What will is posting in the callouts section, joining games rather than creating games (then you can pick your opponent), or taking the time to go through SOC. If they don't want to "devote" their time to benefit their own gameplay, I don't think we should "devote" development time to put something like this in.

I don't mean to continue to bash your suggestions here player, keep them coming.
taking a break from cc, will be back sometime in the future.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class patrickaa317
 
Posts: 2268
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:10 pm
Medals: 116
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (4)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (18) General Achievement (7) Clan Achievement (21)
Tournament Contribution (27) General Contribution (1)

Option to select which Ranks can enter your Speed Game

Postby nietzsche on Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:50 pm

Concise description:
Option to select which Ranks can enter your Speed Game

Specifics/Details:
Select by Minimum rank and Maximum rank.

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

I believe one of the reasons for the decline in the number of speed games available at most times of the day is due to the fact that high ranked players who play mostly casual have been bitten in the ass in the past, losing to lowed ranked players.

I'm aware this has been discussed in the past, but imagine this: Lots of high ranked players wishing to play a 1vs1, waiting behind the fence to join a speed game, but no one wants to start a game because it will be joined by player that has skill but has a low rank at the moment.

If you could put those high ranks behind the fence to play together, whats the harm? The "shoutbox" suggestion was not implemented either, it could serve the purpose also.

This could also serve low ranks, who feel comfortable in games playing with guys with the same skill.


Before you reject and archive this, give it a little bit of thought, not everybody thinks like you you know.

And look at speed games, look at how many games high rank start and play, but discount the freestylers, they don't care about rank, they are all about the speed.
Image
User avatar
Colonel nietzsche
 
Posts: 2530
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown
Medals: 41
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (2)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Contribution (1)

Re: Option to select which Ranks can enter your Speed Game

Postby rhp 1 on Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:06 pm

dumb....

back to the drawing board... though I think it's adorable people actually care about points...
User avatar
Lieutenant rhp 1
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: IF YOU HAVE NO CLUE WHAT YOU'RE DOING, IT IS BEST TO DO IT....... QUICKLY
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (2)

Re: Option to select which Ranks can enter your Speed Game

Postby Metsfanmax on Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:07 pm

Locking this topic for a little while so you two can cool down.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 4825
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Location: NY
Medals: 43
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (7) Clan Achievement (2)
General Contribution (7)

Re: Option to select which Ranks can enter your Speed Game

Postby blakebowling on Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:15 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:Locking this topic for a little while so you two can cool down.

I've taken care of it.

Unlocked.
12:39:59 AM rdsrds2120: sorry, I had a lot of lasagna tonight
12:40:06 AM rdsrds2120: I'm pretty out of it. CRAAZZYYY NIGHT
12:31:04 * Metsfanmax quit (kicked from Social by Metsfanmax - reason: haha gotcha now)
12:59:32 * #1_stunna gropes blakebowling
Corporal blakebowling
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 5144
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1
Medals: 41
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3)
Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (3)
Tournament Contribution (3) General Contribution (10)

Re: Option to select which Ranks can enter your Speed Game

Postby codierose on Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:59 am

love it +1 for me.
but you might find 4+ player games will never fill but i might be wrong.
Image
User avatar
Colonel codierose
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: RANDOMBULLSHIT.ORG
Medals: 99
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (25) General Achievement (7)
Clan Achievement (9) Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby georgizhukov on Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:40 am

I am for a rating restriction of some sort. Why should players who pay to play the game have to endure new recruits who are playing for free and don't even know the rules.
Brigadier georgizhukov
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:08 pm
Location: Charleston SC
Medals: 49
Conquer Cup Silver Achievement (1) Monthly Leader Gold (1) Monthly Leader Silver (1) Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2)
Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4)
Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (4)
Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby betiko on Thu Sep 05, 2013 12:41 pm

How many suggestions is it going to take to make the admin change his mind? Also we have a new admin, has it even been asked again?
Image
User avatar
Brigadier betiko
 
Posts: 6704
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: J'vais vous montrer qui c'est Raoul
Medals: 166
Conquer Cup Gold Achievement (1) Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3)
Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (2)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2)
Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (2) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Bot Achievement (4)
Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (18) General Achievement (31) Clan Achievement (14) Training Achievement (2)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby spiesr on Sun Oct 06, 2013 5:42 pm

Last edited by spiesr on Sun Oct 06, 2013 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Added another.
User avatar
Captain spiesr
 
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota
Medals: 25
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (6) General Contribution (3)

Ability to limit joining players by score

Postby xroads on Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:56 am

[how about having a button on the game start menu that limits joining players by score. It could be as simple as limiting them to 250 points higher or lower]
PLACE THE NAME OF THE SUGGESTION IN THE SUBJECT LINE!

Things to remember when posting a new suggestion are that the dice are random, and that lots of analysis has been done on them both internally and public by community members. Also, please take time to search for previous similar suggestions and, if possible, to check current and archived threads before posting something "new". Delete the xxxxxxx, and substitute your text.

Any questions, contact one of the Suggestions Moderators.
[/Delete Me]


Concise description:
  • xxxxxxx

Specifics/Details:
  • xxxxxxx

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
  • xxxxxxx
User avatar
Colonel xroads
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 9:29 am
Medals: 66
Monthly Leader Gold (1) Monthly Leader Bronze (1) Most Improved Silver (1) Most Improved Bronze (2) Standard Achievement (4)
Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (11) General Achievement (2)

Re: Ability to limit joining players by score

Postby JamesKer1 on Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:07 am

Already Suggested, Modified, and Rejected.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=704&t=274
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class JamesKer1
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:47 am
Location: Good ol' Kentucky
Medals: 37
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) General Achievement (2) Challenge Achievement (1)
Tournament Contribution (3) General Contribution (2)

Re: Make games require minimum or maximum points/rank [REJEC

Postby spiesr on Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:49 am

User avatar
Captain spiesr
 
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota
Medals: 25
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (6) General Contribution (3)

Re: Rank Segregation in Games

Postby chapcrap on Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:12 pm

This suggestion will no longer be considered rejected. I have updated the OP with a few words and MOVED this out of rejected.
Image
User avatar
Captain chapcrap
 
Posts: 9581
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Location: Kansas City
Medals: 169
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (31)
General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (18) Training Achievement (6) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (34)

Re: Rank Segregation in Games

Postby agentcom on Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:06 pm

:o :shock:

... very interesting
Image
User avatar
Colonel agentcom
 
Posts: 4016
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:50 pm
Medals: 87
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Bot Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (19) General Achievement (10) Clan Achievement (9) Challenge Achievement (1) General Contribution (2)

Point minimums for joining games

Postby ViperOverLord on Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:35 am

Allow point minimums on joining games

This needs to be done already. Do you know why you rarely see stars, birds, and colonels creating a 1v1 game and instead are constantly going through their multiplayer underground networks? Cos CC has not added this painfully obviously needed function that has been suggested countless times. But, with a new admin who is more open minded; hopefully this can get some real traction now.

Specifics/Details:

Players can create minimum points for players joining: Suggested mins for 1v1 games (Players have to have the min score to request a game with a player of the min score):

1600
1800
2000
2500
3000

Similar designs could be used for team games too.

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

* People will stop foe'ing players just because they're at a low score and are joining their games. Yes, the current system is not only encouraging a backward exclusivity; it is leading to undue animosities daily!
* Players will be able to more fluidly reach point destinations via the 1v1 games.
* Players who play 1v1 games can continue to play 1v1 games against qualified opponents and keep their rank moving higher without undue duress and then fairly sustain or build upon their rank. The way it is now, players rarely reach brig and general through 1v1 games and then they never sustain them though the same means for long.
* Building off the prior point, players can continue to play 1v1 games and won't have to switch to team games or multiplayer games (often through the underground system) as a means to keep their ranks.
* Lower rank players can have ladders to shoot for themselves. They will also have to earn their games with higher ranked players (generally speaking) and that is a satisfying experience; not an off-putting experience as has been alleged.
* No more point crashing! A colonel can lose about 60 points and then have to win three to five games in a row just to recover. Players who play players on the same plateau can more fluidly advance along the ranks.
* Much more 1v1 players in the brig/general/even conqueror ranks. Right now, due to the lack of point minimums; the top rankings are almost exclusively a function of multiplayer and team games.
* One will not have to go through the extraneous (even laborious) underground networks and can happily use the public gaming system while advancing his/her rank.
User avatar
Major ViperOverLord
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California
Medals: 130
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (3)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (30)
General Achievement (7) Clan Achievement (10) Challenge Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (31)

Re: Rank Segregation in Games

Postby spiesr on Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:27 am

User avatar
Captain spiesr
 
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota
Medals: 25
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (6) General Contribution (3)

PreviousNext

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Login