Rank Restricted Games

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderators: Global Moderators, Suggestions Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

Re: Minimum & Maximum Rank Options

Postby HardAttack on Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:30 am

Like many, i am in your side on this subject, however what i am saying is that this will never happen.
Do not get exhausted yourself on defending this idea. That is the point. :D
User avatar
Colonel HardAttack
 
Posts: 1533
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm
Medals: 79
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (3) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (7) General Achievement (2)
Clan Achievement (12) Tournament Contribution (2) General Contribution (1)

Re: Minimum & Maximum Rank Options

Postby Vermont on Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:24 am

Never give up! Never surrender! :D

But seriously, is "avoiding rank segregation" the reason this idea is being ignored? Because rank segregation is already here; maybe some people just don't want to acknowledge that or play only team games so they have no exposure to it.
Major Vermont
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:28 am
Medals: 12
Standard Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Challenge Achievement (1)

Re: Minimum & Maximum Rank Options

Postby obliterationX on Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:37 am

Great screenshots, unfortunately this will never happen.
User avatar
Colonel obliterationX
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:52 pm
Location: Yeah
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (2)
Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Minimum & Maximum Rank Options

Postby Artimis on Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:08 pm

Vermont wrote:
owenshooter wrote:you can get rank specific games in callouts... this has been suggested multiple times in multiple ways, and it just isn't going to happen. i suggest going to callouts and finding the types of games you want...-0

If people are using the forum for this purpose, then they are doing exactly what you don't want - segregating by rank.

I'll ask again, why are these inconsistent, clunky, methods preferable to actually adding it as a simple game option? You're splitting players into an additional two groups - those who know about and are willing to go through extra steps to play fewer games against a smaller pool of players, and those who don't know (or don't want to use) those methods and play fewer games against a smaller pool of players. You're segregating things into even more groups this way, and I thought that is what you are trying to avoid?

Segregation IS occurring already - do a few speed searches throughout the day to verify this. Adding these options actually adds MORE games back into game finder, and if the selectable ranges are set appropriately large enough, LESS segregation would occur. Let me repeat - LESS segregation would occur. This is in addition to the other benefits I listed.

If the goal is to reduce segregation, please think about how to end this secret password, search the forum, process that is currently segregating players.

Thanks for responding. I think this is a discussion worth having.


OP is using flawed logic

By making it easy to set rank limits MORE rank segregation will result. The inherent laziness of human nature insures that the create private games option(premiums only) is used by few people. This helps to ward off rank segregation for the most part.
==================================================
This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.

Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
User avatar
Captain Artimis
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:09 am
Location: Right behind ya!!! >:D
Medals: 34
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (4)

Re: Minimum & Maximum Rank Options

Postby Vermont on Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:24 pm

Artimis wrote:
OP is using flawed logic

By making it easy to set rank limits MORE rank segregation will result. The inherent laziness of human nature insures that the create private games option(premiums only) is used by few people. This helps to ward off rank segregation for the most part.


Actually, I'm not. Do a search on non-team speed games at different times for a few days. Tell me how many you see that have any sort of upper rank. It doesn't happen but rarely - players are already self-segregating. Sure occassionaly a high ranking player starts a speed game, but it is definitely the exception rather than the norm. (Yes, I am aware there are fewer high ranking players, but the gap is exponentially higher than that.)

Rather than attempt to attack my logic, perhaps you should check out the facts for yourself first?

The point (which I'll state again) is that segregation is ALREADY occurring, but it's done in a clunky, non-obvious way, using private games and semi-secret passwords. If you use min and max rank options that are sufficiently big, this would allow players to create more public games (I sure would!), that more people would be allowed to play in, without requiring players to jump through extra hoops.

Edit: fixed typo.
Major Vermont
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:28 am
Medals: 12
Standard Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Challenge Achievement (1)

Re: Minimum & Maximum Rank Options

Postby Supermarioluigi on Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:12 pm

This has been suggested many times, and always rejected.

So, it's not taking place.
Image
Achieved August 27, 2009
User avatar
Cook Supermarioluigi
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:06 pm
Location: uhh...over there
Medals: 19
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
General Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Minimum & Maximum Rank Options

Postby Vermont on Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:47 pm

Supermarioluigi wrote:This has been suggested many times, and always rejected.

So, it's not taking place.


If it's been rejected to prevent segregation then the fact that segregation is now actively, consistently, occurring should at least revive the discussion. Or was there another rationale for rejecting it?
Major Vermont
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:28 am
Medals: 12
Standard Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Challenge Achievement (1)

Re: Minimum & Maximum Rank Options

Postby Supermarioluigi on Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:53 pm

Vermont wrote:
Supermarioluigi wrote:This has been suggested many times, and always rejected.

So, it's not taking place.


If it's been rejected to prevent segregation then the fact that segregation is now actively, consistently, occurring should at least revive the discussion. Or was there another rationale for rejecting it?


Lack himself basically said no.
And when lack says no, you listen.
Once it's been rejected once, even more so several times, it's rarely looked at again.


"Segregation" has been occuring since this site started, and this "idea" has been brought up ever few months or so and rejected each time.


As much as I would love some sort of max/min rank option, it most likely won't.
Image
Achieved August 27, 2009
User avatar
Cook Supermarioluigi
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:06 pm
Location: uhh...over there
Medals: 19
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
General Achievement (1) Tournament Contribution (1)

Specify a minimum rating to join a game

Postby BrutalBob on Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:34 am

Concise description:
    When creating a game you can specify a minimum rating (not rank) of players that can join.

Specifics:
    When joining an existing game I can avoid games with those whom others have rated poorly, which is the intention of the rating system.

    When you create a game you cant stop these twits from joining it.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
    This will provide some incentive to behave in a civil manner if they cannot join games because people dont want to play with them
Major BrutalBob
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:44 am
Medals: 12
Standard Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Specify a minimum rating to join a game

Postby alstergren on Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:47 pm

BrutalBob wrote:Concise description:
    When creating a game you can specify a minimum rating (not rank) of players that can join.

Specifics:
    When joining an existing game I can avoid games with those whom others have rated poorly, which is the intention of the rating system.

    When you create a game you cant stop these twits from joining it.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
    This will provide some incentive to behave in a civil manner if they cannot join games because people dont want to play with them


Dunno. IMO - if you create a public game, well, you get what you get. You can always play private games or foe people.

If this suggestion would be eventually implemented - it would be beneficial with a default setting (general default if not changed, 0.0) that applies to all games (instead of having to specify for each game set up, the game setting up process is cumbersome as it is already).
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
User avatar
Major alstergren
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Stockholm (Sweden)
Medals: 143
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (4) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Beta Map Achievement (2) Bot Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (20)
General Achievement (12) Clan Achievement (9) Training Achievement (1) Challenge Achievement (4) Tournament Contribution (32)

Re: Specify a minimum rating to join a game

Postby Thezzaruz on Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:06 pm

BrutalBob wrote:Concise description:
    When creating a game you can specify a minimum rating (not rank) of players that can join.


Considering how poor the rating system is and how different people use it I don't think making a block based upon it is a good idea at all. Would also need to start moderating the ratings to prevent abuse and that I can't see happening.
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.
Medals: 8
Standard Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Specify a minimum rating to join a game

Postby BrutalBob on Sun Aug 23, 2009 4:52 am

Most of the people i have seen with low ratings of 3 or less generally deserve them
Major BrutalBob
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:44 am
Medals: 12
Standard Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Specify a minimum rating to join a game

Postby MeDeFe on Sun Aug 23, 2009 5:24 am

Thezzaruz wrote:
BrutalBob wrote:Concise description:
    When creating a game you can specify a minimum rating (not rank) of players that can join.

Considering how poor the rating system is and how different people use it I don't think making a block based upon it is a good idea at all. Would also need to start moderating the ratings to prevent abuse and that I can't see happening.

Word. The ratings system is broken, hardly anyone uses it the way it's intended to be used and those who do face hostility and are reported in C&A. And then warned for using the rating system as it was intended to be used.


BrutalBob wrote:Most of the people i have seen with low ratings of 3 or less generally deserve them

Considering that 3 is average, 3 is (or should) not be bad at all.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 8098
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.
Medals: 21
Standard Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (1)
Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) General Achievement (3) General Contribution (7)

Re: Specify a minimum rating to join a game

Postby PLAYER57832 on Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:28 pm

I would agree with this suggestion if the ratings had any merit. Currently, most people either rate just to get their trophy, rate all 5's or don't rate at all.

Let's FIX the rating system before we use it this way.
Corporal 1st Class PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4)
Training Achievement (1)

Re: Specify a minimum rating to join a game

Postby Halmir on Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:35 pm

Aha the rating system works perfectly - for the moderators! By making it largely pointless (for reasons mentioned above) it cuts out thousands of vindictive whinges about "he said that" or "he made us lose the game" and subsequent flaming. And cos of that extra workload on the Mods u have very little chance of such a thing happening.

If you want to meet some fun players, your best bet is to be chatty during the game, and add anyone who seems fun to your Friends list. U can then invite them to a bunch of private games, and/or tell them to bring their friends also. This cuts out any potential disruption from random noobs. I'd suggest you balance about half your games with your posse, against half in general publics looking for fun opponents. Works for me!
Lieutenant Halmir
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:12 pm
Medals: 28
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (3) Assassin Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)

Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby HighlanderAttack on Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:27 pm

Not sure if it could be done, but it seems to me every time I have someone that has a rating of lower than 4.5 join a game I have issues with them being and a-hole. It sure would be nice to add something to your profile that automatically foes or does not allow low rated people to join.

The rating system basically is easy enough that when you see someone with less than 4.5 they probably have major issues. Anyone under a 4.0 is a true loser to society in most cases.
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit.
User avatar
Lieutenant HighlanderAttack
 
Posts: 10746
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:01 am
Medals: 138
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (4)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (34) General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (5)
Tournament Contribution (34) General Contribution (2)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby owenshooter on Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:58 pm

go to Suggestion... however, this has been suggested multiple times... I would suggest you go to call outs to look for or crate the type of games you want... good luck...-0
Image
DoomYoshi, "GD has no traffic because of venereal diseases like you."
User avatar
Captain owenshooter
 
Posts: 9248
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Medals: 28
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (2)

Minimum Rank...

Postby KraphtOne on Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:44 am

Game 5630044
Game 5630048
Game 5630052
Game 5634142
Game 5634144
Game 5634146
Game 5630053
Game 5634147
Game 5634145


Apparently 4 man feudal freestyle is cat nip for noobs... needs to be a way to only allow a certain rank to join your game... w/out having to make it private

~k1
User avatar
Major KraphtOne
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:33 pm
Medals: 76
Monthly Leader Silver (1) Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3)
Terminator Achievement (3) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (2)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3)
Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (4) Battle Royale Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (3)
General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby sully800 on Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:47 am

This suggestion has existed since the start of the site and has been consistently rejected. If you set rank limits to enter games then generally there wouldn't be any games available to new recruits other than games already filled with new recruits. This creates a much harder learning process for new players and is not a good way to initiate them to the site.

On a darker side, setting rank limits could enable farmers to specifically target new recruits with much less effort (and much less chance that a high ranking player sneaks in anyway).

So the point is, there won't be any rank discrimination as a site option. You are free to invite specific ranks to your private games, but you already know that I can see.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1)
General Achievement (3) Map Contribution (1) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (5)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby Kotaro on Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:53 am

Sully's right, but at the same time, TeamCC keeps accusing people who love Feudal War of being farmers, and yet refuses to recognize that Feudal War is too complicated for n00bs and needs to be on the block list.

Get off your ass lack.
Image
Highest Rank = 2048Image
Kotaro Fuma, The Terror of Death
User avatar
Private Kotaro
 
Posts: 2830
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: Yer Village
Medals: 41
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (9)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby jefjef on Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:58 am

Kotaro wrote:Sully's right, but at the same time, TeamCC keeps accusing people who love Feudal War of being farmers, and yet refuses to recognize that Feudal War is too complicated for n00bs and needs to be on the block list.

Get off your ass lack.


Correct. Any non-standard play maps (I.E. those with bombards) should be noob blocked.

Simple as that.

CC is my master... etc... etc... etc...
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 5994
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass
Medals: 48
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (10)
Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby 72o on Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:00 pm

I don't know about this... there are too many idiots that rate people stupidly. For instance, Mommy2Jesse. She rates you a 1 for attitude if you don't put anything in the game chat. That's stupid. My rating is barely over a 4.5 because of crap like this.
Image
Sergeant 72o
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:04 am
Medals: 34
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2)
Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2)
General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (5)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby slowreactor on Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:15 pm

Can we merge the at least 100 threads of noob-less feuds please?
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1373
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY
Medals: 60
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (11) Training Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (2)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby obliterationX on Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:05 pm

Just rape them anyway, regardless of rank.
User avatar
Colonel obliterationX
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:52 pm
Location: Yeah
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (2)
Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby Thezzaruz on Wed Sep 23, 2009 6:09 pm

72o wrote:She rates you a 1 for attitude if you don't put anything in the game chat. That's stupid. My rating is barely over a 4.5 because of crap like this.


Hmmm.....

Attitude: Covers behaviour in chat, foul language, sore losers, gracious winners, "great chatters!", whining about luck, etc...


A "1" for not saying anything might be a bit harsh but it's not far off tbh, and it's a much more accurate rating than the "normal" "5" for sure. :D
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.
Medals: 8
Standard Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (2)

PreviousNext

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Login