Rank Restricted Games

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderators: Global Moderators, Suggestions Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby HighlanderAttack on Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:27 pm

Not sure if it could be done, but it seems to me every time I have someone that has a rating of lower than 4.5 join a game I have issues with them being and a-hole. It sure would be nice to add something to your profile that automatically foes or does not allow low rated people to join.

The rating system basically is easy enough that when you see someone with less than 4.5 they probably have major issues. Anyone under a 4.0 is a true loser to society in most cases.
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit.
User avatar
Lieutenant HighlanderAttack
 
Posts: 10746
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:01 am
Medals: 138
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (4)
Battle Royale Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (34) General Achievement (16) Clan Achievement (5)
Tournament Contribution (34) General Contribution (2)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby owenshooter on Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:58 pm

go to Suggestion... however, this has been suggested multiple times... I would suggest you go to call outs to look for or crate the type of games you want... good luck...-0
Image
DoomYoshi, "GD has no traffic because of venereal diseases like you."
User avatar
Captain owenshooter
 
Posts: 9264
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Medals: 28
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (2)

Minimum Rank...

Postby KraphtOne on Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:44 am

Game 5630044
Game 5630048
Game 5630052
Game 5634142
Game 5634144
Game 5634146
Game 5630053
Game 5634147
Game 5634145


Apparently 4 man feudal freestyle is cat nip for noobs... needs to be a way to only allow a certain rank to join your game... w/out having to make it private

~k1
User avatar
Major KraphtOne
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:33 pm
Medals: 76
Monthly Leader Silver (1) Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3)
Terminator Achievement (3) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (2)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3)
Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (4) Battle Royale Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (3)
General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby sully800 on Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:47 am

This suggestion has existed since the start of the site and has been consistently rejected. If you set rank limits to enter games then generally there wouldn't be any games available to new recruits other than games already filled with new recruits. This creates a much harder learning process for new players and is not a good way to initiate them to the site.

On a darker side, setting rank limits could enable farmers to specifically target new recruits with much less effort (and much less chance that a high ranking player sneaks in anyway).

So the point is, there won't be any rank discrimination as a site option. You are free to invite specific ranks to your private games, but you already know that I can see.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1)
General Achievement (3) Map Contribution (1) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (5)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby Kotaro on Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:53 am

Sully's right, but at the same time, TeamCC keeps accusing people who love Feudal War of being farmers, and yet refuses to recognize that Feudal War is too complicated for n00bs and needs to be on the block list.

Get off your ass lack.
Image
Highest Rank = 2048Image
Kotaro Fuma, The Terror of Death
User avatar
Private Kotaro
 
Posts: 2830
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: Yer Village
Medals: 41
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (9)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby jefjef on Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:58 am

Kotaro wrote:Sully's right, but at the same time, TeamCC keeps accusing people who love Feudal War of being farmers, and yet refuses to recognize that Feudal War is too complicated for n00bs and needs to be on the block list.

Get off your ass lack.


Correct. Any non-standard play maps (I.E. those with bombards) should be noob blocked.

Simple as that.

CC is my master... etc... etc... etc...
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 5994
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass
Medals: 48
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (10)
Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby 72o on Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:00 pm

I don't know about this... there are too many idiots that rate people stupidly. For instance, Mommy2Jesse. She rates you a 1 for attitude if you don't put anything in the game chat. That's stupid. My rating is barely over a 4.5 because of crap like this.
Image
Sergeant 72o
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:04 am
Medals: 34
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2)
Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2)
General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (5)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby slowreactor on Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:15 pm

Can we merge the at least 100 threads of noob-less feuds please?
Colonel slowreactor
 
Posts: 1373
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Ithaca, NY
Medals: 60
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3)
Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (11) Training Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (1)
General Contribution (2)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby obliterationX on Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:05 pm

Just rape them anyway, regardless of rank.
User avatar
Colonel obliterationX
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:52 pm
Location: Yeah
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (2)
Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby Thezzaruz on Wed Sep 23, 2009 6:09 pm

72o wrote:She rates you a 1 for attitude if you don't put anything in the game chat. That's stupid. My rating is barely over a 4.5 because of crap like this.


Hmmm.....

Attitude: Covers behaviour in chat, foul language, sore losers, gracious winners, "great chatters!", whining about luck, etc...


A "1" for not saying anything might be a bit harsh but it's not far off tbh, and it's a much more accurate rating than the "normal" "5" for sure. :D
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.
Medals: 8
Standard Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby Woodruff on Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:34 pm

sully800 wrote:This suggestion has existed since the start of the site and has been consistently rejected. If you set rank limits to enter games then generally there wouldn't be any games available to new recruits other than games already filled with new recruits. This creates a much harder learning process for new players and is not a good way to initiate them to the site.


See, I disagree...I think it's similar to the promotion system that European soccer uses...you play those at your level and you either graduate to a better level, lower to a worse level or stay put...but always playing those at your level.

sully800 wrote:On a darker side, setting rank limits could enable farmers to specifically target new recruits with much less effort (and much less chance that a high ranking player sneaks in anyway).


How, without it being painfully obvious (and thus easy for the ban-hammer to hit when reported)?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 4974
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4)
Tournament Contribution (4)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby Thezzaruz on Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:38 am

Woodruff wrote:
sully800 wrote:On a darker side, setting rank limits could enable farmers to specifically target new recruits with much less effort (and much less chance that a high ranking player sneaks in anyway).

How, without it being painfully obvious (and thus easy for the ban-hammer to hit when reported)?


Because sully has missed the obvious "any limit should be a +/- range from the game creators rank" part of this. Would be pretty stupid if you could set a limit that would enable yourself to not be allowed in your game. :roll:




Woodruff wrote:.

What, why, when??? Eeh, Hi and welcome back. :o
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.
Medals: 8
Standard Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby 72o on Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:21 am

If you think that 5 is not an accurate rating, you shouldn't assume that people with an average lower than 4.5 are people you shouldn't play.
Image
Sergeant 72o
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:04 am
Medals: 34
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2)
Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2)
General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (5)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby KristenAmazon on Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:23 am

Post below lol.
Last edited by KristenAmazon on Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class KristenAmazon
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:52 pm
Location: Canada
Medals: 1
Standard Achievement (1)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby KristenAmazon on Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:25 am

I feel like my 4.3 rating is somewhat influenced by the 1/1/1 that a "Darthvadar" left for me simply because I could not play realtime risk. What's funny is that he was online when I attacked him. He had time to deploy and everything, my stack then beat his stack after he deployed it (so that he couldn't deploy or reinforce anything else) while I had 8 men left. He called me a "cheap ass bitch" and left me all 1s :-( I had asked if he was interested in playing realtime at a time where I would be available for a few minutes but I made it clear I understood that 24 hour play was 24 hour play. Idunno. I like to think I'm a relatively pleasant player. :D
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class KristenAmazon
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:52 pm
Location: Canada
Medals: 1
Standard Achievement (1)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby jefjef on Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:34 am

Do not put too much emphasis on ratings.

You have those out there giving 3 almost exclusively.

Those who believe that ratings are to be given in comparison to other players instead of as individual performance as it is intended to be.

You have those that revenge rate. Due to losing or just not liking you or your avi or cuz they take offense to you questioning why they made a stupid ass move & lost the game for both of you.

You have those that rate poorly cuz you attack them AFTER they attacked you.

CC wouldn't let us to put rank limits in to join games. Imagine this will not be allowed either.
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 5994
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass
Medals: 48
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (4) General Achievement (2) Clan Achievement (10)
Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby Thezzaruz on Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:27 am

72o wrote:If you think that 5 is not an accurate rating, you shouldn't assume that people with an average lower than 4.5 are people you shouldn't play.


Never said I do. ;)


jefjef wrote: CC wouldn't let us to put rank limits in to join games. Imagine this will not be allowed either.


IMO a rank limit would be better in every way, the ratings are just so misused that it hardly gives us any info at all.
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.
Medals: 8
Standard Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1)
Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Setting to not allow low ratings to join

Postby obliterationX on Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:29 am

Absolutely no way.

The ratings system is already open to severe abuse, and making exclusive games based on your rating would only increase said abuse.
User avatar
Colonel obliterationX
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:52 pm
Location: Yeah
Medals: 44
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (3)
Speed Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (2)
Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby KraphtOne on Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:12 am

Thezzaruz wrote:Because sully has missed the obvious "any limit should be a +/- range from the game creators rank" part of this. Would be pretty stupid if you could set a limit that would enable yourself to not be allowed in your game. :roll:


Ok that sentence is more brilliant than it seems...

In setting a rank limit for a game it would apply to everyone in the game...

So there would be no way to noob farm because if i have a rating of 4000 i would have to set the game to minimum rank X to maximum rank 4000 or else i couldnt play :0)

Great Idea and absolutely no reason not to be able to do this...

Cooks could open up games and not have to worry about majors joining them...

Send It In ...
User avatar
Major KraphtOne
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:33 pm
Medals: 76
Monthly Leader Silver (1) Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3)
Terminator Achievement (3) Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (2)
Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (3)
Random Map Achievement (3) Cross-Map Achievement (4) Battle Royale Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (3)
General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (6) Tournament Contribution (1)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby jammyjames on Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:43 am

no need for the maximum score krapht. just a setting saying ranks. i.e have to be ranked sarg...major. col etc etc
Image
Sergeant 1st Class jammyjames
 
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 3:17 am
Medals: 52
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (2) General Achievement (1) Clan Achievement (4)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby sully800 on Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:24 am

KraphtOne wrote:
Thezzaruz wrote:Because sully has missed the obvious "any limit should be a +/- range from the game creators rank" part of this. Would be pretty stupid if you could set a limit that would enable yourself to not be allowed in your game. :roll:


Ok that sentence is more brilliant than it seems...

In setting a rank limit for a game it would apply to everyone in the game...

So there would be no way to noob farm because if i have a rating of 4000 i would have to set the game to minimum rank X to maximum rank 4000 or else i couldnt play :0)

Great Idea and absolutely no reason not to be able to do this...

Cooks could open up games and not have to worry about majors joining them...

Send It In ...


I agree that it's a very good idea to say the minimum allowed rank is your own rank. That effectively prevents farming, and is a good solution.

But the other half of the problem still exists: New recruits would find themselves only with low ranking players and therefore would have a worse initial experience and be less likely to remain on the site. At least, that has been the prevailing opinion for the last 3 years and it's why this suggestion has never been implemented.

I understand the concept that you should be able to beat people at your own level before moving up and playing the next level - on many levels it makes sense. But it also segregates the score board and could prevent low ranks from joining a lot of games and that is something CC has been wary of from the get go.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (2) Assassin Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2) Tournament Achievement (1)
General Achievement (3) Map Contribution (1) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (5)

Re: Minimum Rank...

Postby Vermont on Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:42 am

We have the inverse problem that many people will not create games to avoid the risk of lower ranks joining, either to avoid farming or to avoid the risk of losing additional points.

It's interesting that the rationale used against a solution like this is that new players wouldn't be able to join games against upper ranks, but how often are public games created by top players currently?* Many only create games that can only be joined once someone has found a specific forum and learned that particular secret password, etc.. Rather than making a system like this built into the game we have a clunky, non-obvious interface for playing people of a similar rank, that only a subset of the players know. This then causes there to be even fewer people available to play games against.

If you introduce a system such as I suggested in the following thread you would be able to find MORE games that are available to a wider subset of players, rather than private games that you need to know the secret method for joining that have a smaller pool of players:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=93624&hilit=vermont

Beginners would still create games for beginners and there would still be a similar number of games for them to play against higher level players. (Which would be as it is today - not many, since many upper ranks often use this artificial method of not having to play row ranked players since no proper method exists.)

* I am aware that certain combination of games high players will create for low players to join, team games for example, as their chance of losing is reduced. But try consistently using team finder to locate a non-team speed game against someone of even a moderate rank. You can't because nothing official exists to let people do so, rendering game finder far less useful than it should be.
Major Vermont
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:28 am
Medals: 12
Standard Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2) Challenge Achievement (1)

Rank Controlled Public Games

Postby mattattam on Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:20 pm

It would be cool if there was an option to create a public game and limit the people who could join to a certain rank. So if you created a game you and are a Captain you don't have to play a game with privates and below or something like that. I know this would be a little harsh on cooks and in particular new recruits. But I think it would be a nice option.

Thoughts or variations?
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Rank Controlled Public Games

Postby Lindax on Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:45 pm

mattattam wrote:It would be cool if there was an option to create a public game and limit the people who could join to a certain rank. So if you created a game you and are a Captain you don't have to play a game with privates and below or something like that. I know this would be a little harsh on cooks and in particular new recruits. But I think it would be a nice option.

Thoughts or variations?


Yep, check out "Callouts" ;)

Lx
User avatar
Major Lindax
Clan Director
Clan Director
 
Posts: 8840
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: Paradise Rediscovered
Medals: 129
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (4) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (4) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (30) General Achievement (9) Clan Achievement (5)
Tournament Contribution (31) General Contribution (10)

Re: Rank Controlled Public Games

Postby haggispittjr on Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:27 pm

just so you know this has been sudgested 1000 times.
User avatar
Lieutenant haggispittjr
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:25 pm
Location: montreal, quebec, canada
Medals: 13
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (1)

PreviousNext

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Login