Rank Restricted Games

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderators: Suggestions Team, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby TheForgivenOne on Fri May 20, 2011 1:11 am

mattattam wrote:
greenoaks wrote:this has been rejected before


Why was it rejected? This seems like a great idea to me!


Would cause rank segregation, which isn't wanted.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TheForgivenOne
 
Posts: 5154
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Medals: 83
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (14) Clan Achievement (7)
General Contribution (11)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby mattattam on Fri May 20, 2011 1:22 am

Would cause rank segregation, which isn't wanted.


I don't know. We have a ranking system for a reason. Better players are higher ranked which creates a separation of rank already. I think people should have an easier option of player similar skilled players. Players would be able to choose who they want to play much easier. What do you think?
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby TheForgivenOne on Fri May 20, 2011 1:36 am

mattattam wrote:
Would cause rank segregation, which isn't wanted.


I don't know. We have a ranking system for a reason. Better players are higher ranked which creates a separation of rank already. I think people should have an easier option of player similar skilled players. Players would be able to choose who they want to play much easier. What do you think?


By Rank Segregation, I mean players are going to me segregated into area's. Cook's will have a harder time getting into games because most people will just put up the limit.

And if you want to get into games with similar ranked players, try the Callout section of the forums.

I personally don't care if the person I play is a cook or a Colonel. I've met Colonels that shouldn't deserve to be their rank based on their game play, and I've met cooks who I think could have easily been a Sargeant. If I meet someone who I think played poorly/stupid, I'll foe them. And it's been pretty obvious I don't care about rank, since I've varied from Sargent to Colonel over the couple months.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TheForgivenOne
 
Posts: 5154
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Medals: 83
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (14) Clan Achievement (7)
General Contribution (11)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby mattattam on Fri May 20, 2011 2:29 pm

I propose the 2 rank above or bellow so there would be less "segregation". My point is that it is already "segregated." Cooks really shouldn't be playing people who are ranked to high over them and I don't want to be playing low ranked players who on the whole have a worse strategy. People would still be able to rank up and down just as easily.

Not many people use the callouts because it takes extra time and they just want to play a game. Many players avoid public games do to playing low ranked players. I don't think I've ever seen a brigadier host a public game. This would open up options that would make CC a more enjoyable experience while avoiding excessive rank seperation.
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby caymanmew on Fri May 20, 2011 2:40 pm

mattattam wrote:I propose the 2 rank above or bellow so there would be less "segregation". My point is that it is already "segregated." Cooks really shouldn't be playing people who are ranked to high over them and I don't want to be playing low ranked players who on the whole have a worse strategy. People would still be able to rank up and down just as easily.

Not many people use the callouts because it takes extra time and they just want to play a game. Many players avoid public games do to playing low ranked players. I don't think I've ever seen a brigadier host a public game. This would open up options that would make CC a more enjoyable experience while avoiding excessive rank seperation.


Game 8569903

general hosted a public game

most people really dont care and those that do just play with friends in private games
high score 3185
User avatar
Major caymanmew
 
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Location: ottawa
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (2) Training Achievement (1)
Tournament Contribution (17)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby mattattam on Fri May 20, 2011 2:55 pm

Game 8569903

general hosted a public game

most people really dont care and those that do just play with friends in private games


My point is not that it hasn't happened but that it doesn't happen very often because of the reasons I stated above ;)
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby caymanmew on Fri May 20, 2011 4:31 pm

mattattam wrote:
Game 8569903

general hosted a public game

most people really dont care and those that do just play with friends in private games


My point is not that it hasn't happened but that it doesn't happen very often because of the reasons I stated above ;)


tons of good player start public games are are within the first few in all the time....but it really does not matter because this is not going to happen
high score 3185
User avatar
Major caymanmew
 
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Location: ottawa
Medals: 71
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (2) Training Achievement (1)
Tournament Contribution (17)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby Victor Sullivan on Fri May 20, 2011 11:13 pm

I feel like Callouts has largely solved this anyhow.

-Sully
User avatar
Corporal Victor Sullivan
 
Posts: 7175
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Location: Columbus, OH
Medals: 45
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (3) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1)
General Achievement (9) Map Contribution (4) Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (6)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby Qwert on Sat May 21, 2011 3:58 am

well if high ranked player dont want to play agianst low,then he can create private game.
case solved
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9193
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Medals: 77
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1)
Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (5) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (6)
Training Achievement (2) Map Contribution (8) Tournament Contribution (22) General Contribution (4)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby mattattam on Sat May 21, 2011 1:07 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:I feel like Callouts has largely solved this anyhow.
-Sully


qwert wrote:well if high ranked player dont want to play agianst low,then he can create private game.
case solved



These are my thoughts on this that I stated above.

Not many people use the callouts because it takes extra time and they just want to play a game. Many players avoid public games due to playing low ranked players. I don't think I've ever seen a brigadier host a public game. This would open up options that would make CC a more enjoyable experience while avoiding excessive rank seperation.
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby Herbas on Sat May 21, 2011 2:25 pm

If rank segregation really appears after introduction of such feature, wouldn't it confirm that such feature is in high demand? So why CC should reject implementing a feature which would be widely used? Shouldn't rank segregation be solved in other ways than simply rejecting rank restriction feature which would be supposedly in high demand?
User avatar
Captain Herbas
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:52 pm
Location: Top Score: 2647
Medals: 30
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1)
Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Speed Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) General Achievement (1)
Clan Achievement (6)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby Dibbun on Sat May 21, 2011 2:54 pm

mattattam wrote:My point is that it is already "segregated." Cooks really shouldn't be playing people who are ranked to high over them


Who the hell are you to say that? Not everyone is a point whore, some of us just want to play.
User avatar
Lieutenant Dibbun
 
Posts: 908
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:42 pm
Location: Fresno, CA
Medals: 32
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Triples Achievement (1) Quadruples Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (2) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Ratings Achievement (2) General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (2)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby TheForgivenOne on Sat May 21, 2011 4:54 pm

Herbas wrote:If rank segregation really appears after introduction of such feature, wouldn't it confirm that such feature is in high demand? So why CC should reject implementing a feature which would be widely used? Shouldn't rank segregation be solved in other ways than simply rejecting rank restriction feature which would be supposedly in high demand?


Because this is lackattacks site, and he has already said he doesn't want this kind of Rank Segregation.

From the huge "Surrender" pile sitting in Rejected, should we implement it just based on people wanting it?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TheForgivenOne
 
Posts: 5154
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Medals: 83
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (14) Clan Achievement (7)
General Contribution (11)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby mattattam on Sat May 21, 2011 10:15 pm

TheForgivenOne wrote:
Herbas wrote:If rank segregation really appears after introduction of such feature, wouldn't it confirm that such feature is in high demand? So why CC should reject implementing a feature which would be widely used? Shouldn't rank segregation be solved in other ways than simply rejecting rank restriction feature which would be supposedly in high demand?


Because this is lackattacks site, and he has already said he doesn't want this kind of Rank Segregation.

From the huge "Surrender" pile sitting in Rejected, should we implement it just based on people wanting it?


I understand the concern with excessively separating players so much by rank Forgiven. That makes sense. That's what made me think of the idea of limiting the games to 2 ranks above or bellow one's current rank, as opposed to say a colonol limiting a game to colonol's or above.

What do you think about this idea Forgiven? It could even be limited to 3 ranks above or bellow someones current rank.
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby johncusac on Sun May 22, 2011 11:51 pm

I like this idea! I think it would be a great option to add.
Major johncusac
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:18 am
Medals: 7
Standard Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Random Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (1)
General Achievement (1)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby greenoaks on Mon May 23, 2011 12:12 am

public games are open to the public. end of story.

if you want to decide who can join your games create private games. they allow you to restrict who joins your games to 1 rank above and below, or 2 or 3.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class greenoaks
 
Posts: 9997
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am
Medals: 138
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (30) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (14)
Tournament Contribution (34) General Contribution (4)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby mattattam on Mon May 23, 2011 11:32 am

greenoaks wrote:public games are open to the public. end of story.

if you want to decide who can join your games create private games. they allow you to restrict who joins your games to 1 rank above and below, or 2 or 3.


Your thought is REJECTED!!! :D End of story
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby mattattam on Mon May 23, 2011 11:33 am

johncusac wrote:I like this idea! I think it would be a great option to add.


I think so too!
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby greenoaks on Mon May 23, 2011 11:45 am

mattattam wrote:
greenoaks wrote:public games are open to the public. end of story.

if you want to decide who can join your games create private games. they allow you to restrict who joins your games to 1 rank above and below, or 2 or 3.


Your thought is REJECTED!!! :D End of story

my thought has been implemented, probably before my thought existed, but hey, that is beside the point.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class greenoaks
 
Posts: 9997
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am
Medals: 138
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (4) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (4) Freestyle Achievement (4) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (4)
Fog of War Achievement (4) Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2)
Cross-Map Achievement (4) Ratings Achievement (4) Tournament Achievement (30) General Achievement (3) Clan Achievement (14)
Tournament Contribution (34) General Contribution (4)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby mattattam on Mon May 23, 2011 12:16 pm

It is besides the point. Stop trolling please!
Major mattattam
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:54 am
Medals: 31
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2)
Speed Achievement (3) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (4)
General Achievement (3) Tournament Contribution (3)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby kabuki.mono on Fri May 27, 2011 11:59 pm

I like this idea -but- as it has been said before that some lower ranked players play better and have better attitude than some high ranked players, and vice versa. So I'm kind of 50/50
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class kabuki.mono
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 12:10 am
Location: Under a rock with a 6gb connection.
Medals: 20
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (2)
Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby nvrijn on Sun May 29, 2011 2:47 pm

I'm not a "point whore" (interesting term) but I agree with Herbas - "If rank segregation really appears after introduction of such feature, wouldn't it confirm that such feature is in high demand? So why CC should reject implementing a feature which would be widely used?"

I mean it's optional right? If it was mandatory, folks who disagree would be affected, and have valid objections. But how does giving a player who wants to start a game the option of limiting it to 2 ranks above and below him, dramatically change things for the worse for everyone else? Options are good.

In fact, this option is needed as a response to another option CC now offers, which did affect non-option users.

In my own case, I don't know too many other gamers, which restricts the use of private games for me, so the addition of "reserved" froze me out of many of the "all officer" games I had enjoyed before. For a casual gamer who enjoys competition but doesn't spend the time cultivating contacts, this new option would be a valuable addition ... allow me the same ability to somewhat restrict my opponents as the guys playing private games or reserving positions FOR THEIR OPPONENTS in public games have now.

And a range of 5 ranks is not exactly restrictive. - Thx
User avatar
Major nvrijn
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:06 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby TheForgivenOne on Sun May 29, 2011 4:11 pm

nvrijn wrote:I mean it's optional right? If it was mandatory, folks who disagree would be affected, and have valid objections. But how does giving a player who wants to start a game the option of limiting it to 2 ranks above and below him, dramatically change things for the worse for everyone else? Options are good.


Yes, but the admin's aren't going to start adding everything just because "Well hey, it's an option!" This site would be riddled with a ton of useless game settings and different things that don't get used, which take up space.

You seriously don't know how many times I have heard "Well, it's an option, you don't have to use it" as an excuse to implement something. It really get's annoying.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TheForgivenOne
 
Posts: 5154
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Medals: 83
Standard Achievement (4) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (3)
Assassin Achievement (3) Manual Troops Achievement (3) Freestyle Achievement (4) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (3) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (3) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (2) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Beta Map Achievement (1) Battle Royale Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (14) Clan Achievement (7)
General Contribution (11)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby stahrgazer on Sun May 29, 2011 6:08 pm

Most people like the idea.

And yes, rank segregation exists; but it's not "sponsored" by the site. Because it "looks odd," for the site to sponsor it by coding to enable it more, they're not going to do it, even if it would make things easier for various ranks to avoid accusations of farming because they want to open 50 games on a given map and settings.

Politics, you see.
Image
User avatar
Captain stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1390
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Medals: 56
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (3) Triples Achievement (3) Quadruples Achievement (3) Terminator Achievement (1)
Assassin Achievement (1) Manual Troops Achievement (1) Freestyle Achievement (1) Nuclear Spoils Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (4)
Trench Warfare Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (2) Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3)
Bot Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (3) Tournament Achievement (1) General Achievement (4) Clan Achievement (7)
Tournament Contribution (1) General Contribution (7)

Re: Limiting games to Rank (Option)

Postby nvrijn on Mon May 30, 2011 2:41 am

You seriously don't know how many times I have heard "Well, it's an option, you don't have to use it" as an excuse to implement something. It really get's annoying.


I can believe it. :roll: But that's how most new ideas get implemented right? I can't think of the last "mandatory" change in the rules I've seen.

I agree with you that if the excuse to implement something is primarily
I think it could be useful and you could make it optional
, then that is a good reason to just say no.

But if the idea has merit ... if it can be shown to add demonstrated value for a significant number of players, that's a rather different case. It's a high barrier ... I think this suggestion meets it for the reasons stated.

Thanks,
Nvrijn
User avatar
Major nvrijn
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:06 am
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Quadruples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (2)
Manual Troops Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (1) Polymorphic Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (3) Trench Warfare Achievement (1)
Teammate Achievement (2) Random Map Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Beta Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (2)

PreviousNext

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Login