Phatscotty wrote:yeah, you searched my name and posted the results. REAL thorough pal!
I offered to address anything you wanted to bring up. You made a joke. That's a pass from you.
It's okay, I have made that offer numerous times. Nobody has ever taken me up on it. Probably because it's so easy and they aren't one bit full of shit.
Here are some similar answers from the past
"Phatscotty, it's so easy to prove you are lying about a million things"
"post one then"
"well, there are just so many...."
"pick ONE!"
"I don't want to waste my time"
I view them ALL as compliments. Take the challenge dewd. You have more respect from me than most libs. That isn't saying a lot, but the truth is you only degenerate to name calling about 80% of the time, whereas the rest of your enlightened and educated like-mindeds skip the issue and name call 96-100% of the time (Natty is the champ).
You claim they are not full of shit, but I have before and am now claiming they are. I have directly claimed your conclusion based on this very example in this thread is as you say, completely full of shit and will go further as to say devoid of any real thought. While many might consider
all of your posts to be a joke, I truly did not only mean it as a joke. It is real evidence, that you construe all threads based on every story and misrepresent them, sometimes wildly, and always to your point of view. I feel every nearly every title itself proves my point conclusively, especially when viewed in masse.
The challenge has already been answered and won, and you don't even realize it. My point is that your conclusions based on your supposed threads are simply wrong, or at the very least, completely overstated, and always biased towards your political opinion.
You however, are the one that glosses over my more direct posts, and instead waste time on these sub-discussions maybe assuming I don't realize it, but am actually laughing every time. And its ok, because as I said, so many times....its just ffn fun at this point.
I repeatedly pointed out it was ridiculous. I simply went on to point out that your conclusions based on this one example were also ridiculous. My point was never about this one teacher, but that you basing your entire theory of our entire educational system based on this one example, was...as I said before....uneducated.
entire educational system 
